Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Epistemics for Forensics

  • Roger G. Koppl, Robert Kurzban and Lawrence Kobilinsky
Abstract

Forensic science error rates are needlessly high. Applying the perspective of veritistic social epistemology to forensic science could produce new institutional designs that would lower forensic error rates. We make such an application through experiments in the laboratory with human subjects. Redundancy is the key to error prevention, discovery, and elimination. In the “monopoly epistemics” characterizing forensics today, one privileged actor is asked to identify the truth. In “democratic epistemics,” several independent parties are asked. In an experiment contrasting them, democratic epistemics reduced the rate at which biased observers obscured the truth by two-thirds. These results highlight, first, the potential of “epistemic systems design,” which employs the techniques of economic systems design to address issues of veracity rather than efficiency, and second, the value of “experimental epistemology,” which employs experimental techniques in the study of science.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Akerlof, G. A. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3): 488500.
Aumann, R. J. 1976. “Agreeing to Disagree.” Annals of Statistics 4: 1236–9.
Austen-Smith, D. and Banks, J. S.. 1996. “Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” American Political Science Review 90(1): 3445.
Bartley, W. W. III. 1987. “Alienation Alienated: The Economics of Knowledge versus the Psychology and Sociology of Knowledge.” In Radnitzsky, G. and Bartley, W. W. III (eds.), Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Bolton, G. and Ockenfels, A.. 2000. “ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition.” American Economic Review 90: 166–93.
Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.. 1984. “Voter Choice: Evaluating Political Alternatives.” The American Behavioral Scientist 28(2): 185201.
Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L.. 1993. Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brock, W. A., Durlauf, S. N., and West, K. D.. 2007. “Model Uncertainty and Policy Evaluation: Some Theory and Empirics.” Journal of Econometrics 136: 629–64.
Bromwich, M. R. 2005. Second Report of the Independent Investigator for the Houston Police Department Crime Laboratory and Property Room. Retrieved May 24, 2007, from http://www.hpdlabinvestigation.org/reports/050531report.pdf
Buchanan, A. 2002. “Social Moral Epistemology.” Social Philosophy and Policy 19: 126–51.
Buchanan, A. 2007. “Institutions, Beliefs and Ethics: Eugenics as a Case Study.” Journal of Political Philosophy 15: 2245.
Charness, G. and Rabin, M.. 2002. “Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 817–69.
Cole, S. 2005. “More Than Zero: Accounting for Error in Latent Fingerprint Identification.” The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 95(3): 9851078.
Dewald, W. G., Thursby, J. G. and Anderson, R. G.. 1986. “Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project.” American Economic Review 76: 587603.
Feddersen, T. J. and Pesendorfer, W.. 1999. “Elections, Information Aggregation, and Strategic Voting.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96: 10572–4.
Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K.. 1999. “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817–68.
Fisher, J. 2008. Forensics Under Fire: Are Bad Science and Dueling Experts Corrupting Criminal Justice? New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Fudenberg, D. and Kreps, D. M.. 1988. “A Theory of Learning, Experimentation, and Equilibrium in Games.” Unpublished manuscript.
Giannelli, P. C. 1997. “The Abuse of Evidence in Criminal Cases: The Need for Independent Crime Laboratories.” Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law 4: 439–78.
Giannelli, P. C. 2007. “Confirmation Bias.” Criminal Justice, 22(3): 60–1.
Glenn, M. 2006. “Under the Microscope: HPD's Evidence Closely Watched This Time Around.” Houston Chronicle, July 11. Retrieved May 24, 2007 from http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/special/crimelab/4038116.html
Goldman, A. I. 1978. “Epistemics: The Regulative Theory of Cognition.” The Journal of Philosophy 75: 509523.
Goldman, A. I. 1992. Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldman, A. I. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, A. I. 2001. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 85109.
Goldman, A. I. 2007. “Social Epistemology,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2007 edition. E. N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2007/entries/epistemology-social/
Grieve, D. 1996. “Possession of Truth.” Journal of Forensic Identification. 46(5): 521–8.
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V.. 1996. “Social Distance and Other-regarding Behavior in Dictator Games.” American Economic Review 86: 653–60.
Jonakait, R. N. 1991. “Forensic Science: The Need for Regulation.” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 4: 109–91.
Kaufman, F. 1998. Commission on Proceedings Involving Guy Paul Morin. Queen's Printer for Ontario.
Kelly, J. F. and Wearne, P.. 1998. Tainting Evidence: Inside the Scandals at the FBI Crime Lab. NewYork: The Free Press.
Khanna, R. 2006. “Crime Lab's DNA Section, Shut in '02, Will Reopen,” Houston Chronicle, June 21. Retrieved May 24, 2007, from http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/special/crimelab/3988198.html
Kitcher, P. 1993. The Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koppl, R. 2005a. “Epistemic Systems.” Episteme, A Journal of Social Epistemology 2(2): 91106.
Koppl, R. 2005b. “How to Improve Forensic Science.” European Journal of Law and Economics 20(3): 255–86.
Koppl, R. Forthcoming. “Romancing Forensics: Legal Failure in Forensic Science Administration.” In López, E. (ed.), Government Failure in the Legal System: A Public Choice Review of the Law. Independent Institute.
List, C. and Pettit, P.. Forthcoming. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design and Status of Corporate Agents.
McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V., and Trouard, T.. 2001. “A Functional Imaging Study of Cooperation in Two-Person Reciprocal Exchange.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98(4): 11832–5.
McDougall, L. 2006. “Shirley McKie: Was it Really an Honest Mistake?” Sunday Herald, February 12.
McRoberts, F., Mills, S., and Possley, M.. 2004. “Forensics Under the Microscope: Unproven Techniques Sway Courts, Erode Justice.” Chicago Tribune, October 17.
Merton, R. K. 1937/1957. Science and the Social Order. Reproduced in his Social Theory and Social Structure. Rev. ed. New York: The Free Press.
Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J.. 1986. “Relying on Information of Interested Parties.” RAND Journal of Economics 17(1): 1832.
Moenssens, A. A. 1993. “Novel Scientific Evidence in Criminal Cases: Some Words of Caution.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 84: 121.
Office of the Inspector General, United States Department of Justice. 1997. “The FBI Laboratory: An Investigation into Laboratory Practices and Alleged Misconduct in Explosives-Related and Other Cases.” Retrieved from http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/97-04a/index.htm
Office of the Inspector General, United States Department of Justice. 2004. “The FBI DNA Laboratory: A Review of Protocol and Practice.”
Office of the Inspector General, United States Department of Justice. 2006. “A Review of the FBI's Handling of the Brandon Mayfield Case: Unclassified Executive Summary.”
Peart, S. and Levy, D.. 2008Introduction to the Symposium on Ethics.” Eastern Economic Journal 34(1): 101–2.
Peterson, J. L. and Markham, P. N.. 1995a. “Crime Lab Proficiency Testing Results, 1978–1991, I: Identification and Classification of Physical Evidence.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 40(6): 9941008.
Peterson, J. L. and Markham, P. N.. 1995b. “Crime Lab Proficiency Testing Results, 1978–1991, II: Resolving Questions of Common Origin.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 40(6): 1009–29.
Pyrek, K. M. 2007. Forensic Science Under Siege: The Challenges of Forensic Laboratories and the Medico-Legal Death Investigation System. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
Quine, W. V. O. 1986. “Reply to Morton White.” In Hahn, L. E. & Schilpp, P. A. (eds.), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, pp. 663–5. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Rabin, M. 1993. “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics.” American Economic Review 83: 12811302.
Risinger, M., Saks, M. J., Thompson, W. C., and Rosenthal, R.. 2002. “The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion.” California Law Review 90: 156.
Saks, M. J. 1998. “Merlin and Solomon: Lessons from the Law's Formative Encounters with Forensic Identification Science.” Hastings Law Journal 49: 1069–141.
Saks, M. J. et al. 2001. “Model Prevention and Remedy of Erroneous Convictions Act.” Arizona State Law Journal 33: 665718.
Saks, M. J. and Koehler, J. J.. 2005. “The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science.” Science 309: 892–5.
Schelling, T. C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schuetz, A. 1943. “The Problem of Rationality in the Social World.” Economica, N.S. 10(38): 130–49.
Smith, V. L. 2003. “Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics.” American Economic Review 93: 465508.
State of Illinois. 2002. Report of the Governor's Commission on Capital Punishment April 15.
State of Maryland v. Bryan Rose. 2007. Case K06-0545. Memorandum Decision, October 19.
Sterelny, K. 2003. Thought in a Hostile World. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stiles, M. R., Levine, R. H., and Sarmousakis, P. A.. Government's Combined Report to the Court and Motions in Limine Concerning Fingerprint Evidence, United States v. Mitchell, No. 96-00407, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Retrieved August 2006, from http://www.clpex.com
van, Winden F. 1999. “Experimental Studies of Signaling Games.” In Luini, L. (ed.), Uncertain Decisions, Bridging Theory and Experiments, pp. 147–73. Boston: Kluwer.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Episteme
  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed