Skip to main content

God as the Ultimate Conspiracy Theory


Traditional secular conspiracy theories and explanations of worldly events in terms of supernatural agency share interesting epistemic features. This paper explores what can be called “supernatural conspiracy theories”, by considering such supernatural explanations through the lens of recent work on the epistemology of secular conspiracy theories. After considering the similarities and the differences between the two types of theories, the prospects for agnosticism both with respect to secular conspiracy theories and the existence of God are then considered. Arguments regarding secular conspiracy theories suggest ways to defend agnosticism with respect to God from arguments that agnosticism is not a logically stable position and that it ultimately collapses into atheism, as has been argued by N. Russell Hanson and others. I conclude that such attacks on religious agnosticism fail to appreciate the conspiratorial features of God's alleged role in the universe.

Hide All
Basham Lee. 2006. “Afterthoughts on Conspiracy Theory: Resilience and Ubiquity.” In Coady D. (ed.), Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate1, pp. 133–8. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Benn Piers. 1999. “Some Uncertainties About Agnosticism.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 46: 171–88.
Boethius. 1962. The Consolation of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
Clarke Steve. 2002. “Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32(2): 131–50.
Coady David (ed.). 2006. Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Earman John. 2000. Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument against Miracles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hanson Norwood Russell. 1971a. “The Agnostic's Dilemma.” In Toulmin S. and Woolf H. (eds.), What I Do Not Believe and Other Essays, pp. 303–8. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Hanson Norwood Russell. 1971b. “What I Don't Believe.” In Toulmin S. and Woolf H. (eds.), What I Do Not Believe and Other Essays, pp. 309–31. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Hanson Norwood Russell, Toulmin Stephen, and Woolf Harry (eds.). 1971. What I Do Not Believe, and Other Essays. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Hume David. 1748. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.
Keeley Brian L. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.” Journal of Philosophy 96: 109–26.
Keeley Brian L. (ed.). 2005. Paul Churchland. Contemporary Philosophy in Focus. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McLaughlin Robert. 1984. “Necessary Agnosticism?Analysis 44(4): 198202.
Morris Thomas V. 1985. “Agnosticism.” Analysis 45(4): 219–24.
Pigden Charles. 2006. “Complots of Mischief.” In Coady D. (ed.), Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate, pp. 139–66. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Sagan Carl and Ann Druyan. 1995. The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. New York: Random House.
Scriven Michael. 1966. Primary Philosophy. New York: McGrawHill.
Seely Hart. 2002. “The Unknown.” Retrieved July 14, 2007, from
Seely Hart (ed.). 2003. Pieces of Intelligence: The Existential Poetry of Donald H. Rumsfeld. New York: Free Press.
Tweyman Stanley (ed.). 1996. Hume on Miracles. Bristol, England: Thoemmes Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 66 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 271 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.