Skip to main content Accessibility help

Group Knowledge Analyzed

  • Raimo Tuomela

One can speak of knowledge in an impersonal sense: It is accepted as knowledge that copper expands when heated, that the capital of Finland is Helsinki, and that no one under 18 years of age is entitled to vote in national elections. Such knowledge is not an abstract entity floating around in some kind of Platonic “third world”. Rather it is knowledge that some actual agent or agents actually have or have had as contents of their appropriate mental states (belief states) and that others on this basis can have as their knowledge. People find out things either by themselves or together, and often what they come to believe about the world is true and more or less well-grounded, thus knowledge much in the sense of traditional epistemology. We may say then that there is knowledge in groups or communities, e.g. in the scientific community, that such and such is the case, and that in some cases groups as groups know; and in all these cases there must be or have been actual knowers.

Hide All
Audi, R. (1994). Dispositional Beliefs and Dispositions to Believe. Noûs 28, 419434
Audi, R. (1998). Epistemology. London and New York: Routledge.
Delaney, C. (1977). Theory of Knowledge. In Delaney, C. et al. (eds.), The Synoptic Vision: Essays on the Philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 142.
Gettier, E. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis 23, 121123
Kusch, M. (2002). Knowledge by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Longino, H. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Rosenberg, J. (2002). Thinking About Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmitt, F. (1994). The Justification of Group Beliefs. In Schmitt, F., Socializing Epistemology. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. pp. 257287.
Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sellars, W. (1956) Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. In Feigl, H. and Scriven, M. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science I. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 253329.
Sellars, W. (1968). Science and Metaphysics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sellars, W. (1975). The Structure of Knowledge. In Castaneda, H.-N. (ed.), Action, Knowledge, and Reality: Studies in Honor of Wilfrid Sellars. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc. pp. 295347.
Tuomela, R. (1992). Group Beliefs. Synthese 91, 285318.
Tuomela, R. (1995). The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Tuomela, R. (2000). Belief versus Acceptance. Philosophical Explorations 2, 122137.
Tuomela, R. (2002a). Joint Intention and Commitment. In Meggle, G., (ed.), Social Facts & Collective Intentionality. In German Library of Sciences, Philosophical Research, vol. 1, Frankfurt: Dr. Hänsel-Hohenhausen AG, pp. 385418.
Tuomela, R. (2002b). The We-mode and the I-mode. In Schmitt, F. (ed.), Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality. Lanham: MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (forthcoming).
Tuomela, R. (2002c). The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tuomela, R. (2003). Collective Acceptance, Social Institutions, and Group Beliefs. In Buschlinger, Wolfgang & Lütge, Christoph (eds.). Kaltblütig, Philosophie von einem rationalen Standpunkt, Stuttgart: Hirzel Verlag. pp.429446.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed