Skip to main content

Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective

  • Christian List

In this paper, I introduce the emerging theory of judgment aggregation as a framework for studying institutional design in social epistemology. When a group or collective organization is given an epistemic task, its performance may depend on its ‘aggregation procedure’, i.e. its mechanism for aggregating the group members' individual beliefs or judgments into corresponding collective beliefs or judgments endorsed by the group as a whole. I argue that a group's aggregation procedure plays an important role in determining whether the group can meet two challenges: the ‘rationality challenge’ and the ‘knowledge challenge’. The rationality challenge arises when a group is required to endorse consistent beliefs or judgments; the knowledge challenge arises when the group's beliefs or judgments are required to track certain truths. My discussion seeks to identify those properties of an aggregation procedure that affect a group's success at meeting each of the two challenges.

Hide All
Austen-Smith, David, & Banks, Jeffrey (1996). Information Aggregation, Rationality and the Condorcet Jury Theorem. American Political Science Review 90: 3445.
Ben-Yashar, Ruth, & Nitzan, Shmuel (1997). The optimal decision rule for fixed-size committees in dichotomous choice situations: the general result. International Economic Review 38: 175186.
Borland, Philip (1989). Majority systems and the Condorcet jury theorem. Statistician 38: 181189.
Bovens, Luc, & Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2005). Democratic Answers to Complex Questions: an Epistemic Perspective. Synthese, forthcoming.
Dietrich, Franz (2005). Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems. Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming.
Dietrich, Franz, & List, Christian (2004). A model of jury decisions where all jurors have the same evidence. Synthese 142: 175202.
Dietrich, Franz, & List, Christian (2005). Strategy-proof judgment aggregation. Working paper, LSE.
Dryzek, John, & List, Christian (2003). Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science 33(1): 128.
Estlund, David (1994). Opinion leaders, independence and Condorcet's jury theorem. Theory and Decision 36: 131162.
Giere, Ronald (2002). Distributed Cognition in Epistemic Cultures. Philosophy of Science 69: 637644.
Goldman, Alvin (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, Alvin (2004). Group Knowledge versus Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology. EPISTEME 1: 1122.
Goodin, Robert E. (ed.) (1996). The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grofman, Bernard, Owen, Guillermo, & Feld, Scott (1983). Thirteen theorems in search of the truth. Theory and Decision 15: 261278.
Knorr Cetina, Karin (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ladha, Krishna (1992). The Condorcet jury theorem, free speech and correlated votes. American Journal of Political Science 36: 617634.
List, Christian (2002). Two Concepts of Agreement. The Good Society 11(1): 7279.
List, Christian (2003). Distributed Cognition: A Perspective from Social Choice Theory. Presentation, Australian National University, London School of Economics, University of Liverpool.
List, Christian (2005a). The Discursive Dilemma and Public Reason. Ethics, forthcoming.
List, Christian (2005b). The Probability of Inconsistencies in Complex Collective Decisions. Social Choice and Welfare 24(1): 332.
List, Christian, & Pettit, Philip (2002). Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result. Economics and Philosophy 18: 89110.
List, Christian, & Pettit, Philip (2004). Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared. Synthese 140(1-2): 207235.
List, Christian, & Pettit, Philip (2005a). On the Many as One. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33(4): 377390.
List, Christian, & Pettit, Philip (2005b). Group Agency and Supervenience. Working paper, LSE.
Nozick, Robert (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University Press.
Pauly, Marc, & van, Hees Martin (2005). Logical Constraints on Judgment Aggregation. Journal of Philosophical Logic, forthcoming.
Pettit, Philip (2001) Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma. Philosophical Issues (supplement to Nous) 11: 268–99.
Pettit, Philip (2003). Groups with Minds of their Own. In Schmitt, Fred (ed.). Socializing Metaphysics. New York: Rowan and Littlefield.
Rovane, Carol (1998). The Bounds of Agency: An essay in Revisionary Metaphysics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 73 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 451 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.