Skip to main content


  • Boaz Miller and Isaac Record

People increasingly form beliefs based on information gained from automatically filtered internet sources such as search engines. However, the workings of such sources are often opaque, preventing subjects from knowing whether the information provided is biased or incomplete. Users' reliance on internet technologies whose modes of operation are concealed from them raises serious concerns about the justificatory status of the beliefs they end up forming. Yet it is unclear how to address these concerns within standard theories of knowledge and justification. To shed light on the problem, we introduce a novel conceptual framework that clarifies the relations between justified belief, epistemic responsibility, action and the technological resources available to a subject. We argue that justified belief is subject to certain epistemic responsibilities that accompany the subject's particular decision-taking circumstances, and that one typical responsibility is to ascertain, so far as one can, whether the information upon which the judgment will rest is biased or incomplete. What this responsibility comprises is partly determined by the inquiry-enabling technologies available to the subject. We argue that a subject's beliefs that are formed based on internet-filtered information are less justified than they would be if she either knew how filtering worked or relied on additional sources, and that the subject may have the epistemic responsibility to take measures to enhance the justificatory status of such beliefs.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Alston, W. 1998. ‘The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification.’ Philosophical Perspectives, 2: 257–99.
Annis, D. B. 1978. ‘A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification.’ American Philosophical Quarterly, 15(3): 213–19.
Baird, D. 2004. Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bakshy, E. 2012. ‘Rethinking Information Diversity in Networks.’
Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. 1998. ‘The Extended Mind.’ Analysis, 58(1): 719.
Clark, A. 2010. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: OUP.
Coady, D. 2011. ‘An Epistemic Defence of the Blogosphere.’ Journal of Applied Philosophy, 28(3): 277–94.
Colombo, F. and Fortunati, L. (eds). 2011. Broadband Society and Generational Changes. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Conee, E. and Feldman, R. 2004. Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Douglas, H. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Fantl, J. and McGrath, M. 2009. Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford: OUP.
Foley, R. 2005. ‘Justified Belief as Responsible Belief’. In Steup, M. and Sosa, E. (eds), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, pp. 313–26. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Giere, R. N. 2006. ‘The Role of Agency in Distributed Cognitive Systems.’ Philosophy of Science, 73(5): 710–19.
Giere, R. N. 2007. ‘Distributed Cognition without Distributed Knowing.’ Social Epistemology, 21(3): 313–20.
Goldberg, S. C. 2007. Anti-Individualism: Mind and Language, Knowledge and Justification. Cambridge: CUP.
Goldberg, S. C. 2012. ‘Epistemic Extendedness, Testimony, and the Epistemology of Instrument-Based Belief.’ Philosophical Explorations, 15(2): 181–97.
Goldman, A. I. 1999. ‘Internalism Exposed.’ Journal of Philosophy, 96(6): 271–93.
Goldman, A. I. 2008. ‘The Social Epistemology of Blogging.’ In van den Hoven, J. and Weckert, J. (eds), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, pp. 111–22. Cambridge: CUP.
Goldman, A. I. 2011. ‘Reliabilism.’ In. Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 edn):
Haraway, D. 1991. ‘A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.’ In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, pp. 149–81. New York: Routledge.
Hardwig, J. 1985. ‘Epistemic Dependence.’ Journal of Philosophy, 82(7): 335–49.
Humphreys, P. 2004. Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. New York: OUP.
Humphreys, P. 2009. ‘Network Epistemology.’ Episteme, 6(2): 221–9.
Introna, L. and Nissenbaum, H. 2000. ‘Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters.’ Information Society, 16(3): 117.
Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kornblith, H. 1983. ‘Justified Belief and Epistemically Responsible Action.’ Philosophical Review, 92(1): 3348.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: OUP.
Lehrer, K. 1995. ‘Knowledge and the Trustworthiness of Instruments.’ The Monist, 78(2): 156–70.
Longino, H. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McCroy, P. 2005. ‘The Time Lords: Measurement and Performance in Sprinting.’ British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39: 785–6.
Origgi, G. 2012. ‘Designing Wisdom through the Web: The Passion of Ranking.’ In Landemore, H. and Elster, J. (eds), Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms, pp. 3855. Cambridge: CUP.
Pariser, E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. London: Penguin.
Pasquale, F. 2011. ‘Restoring Transparency to Automated Authority.’ Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 9: 235–53.
Preston, J. 2010. ‘The Extended Mind, the Concept of Belief, and Epistemic Credit.’ In Menary, R. (ed.), The Extended Mind, pp. 355–69. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Record, I. Forthcoming. ‘Technology and Knowledge.’
Rogers, R. 2004. Information Politics on the Web. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rothbart, D. 2007. Philosophical Instruments: Minds and Tools at Work. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Simon, J. 2010. ‘The Entanglement of Trust and Knowledge on the Web.’ Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4): 343–55.
Simpson, T. W. 2012. ‘Evaluating Google as an Epistemic Tool.’ Metaphilosophy, 43(4): 426–45.
Simson, R. S. 1993. ‘Values, Circumstances, and Epistemic Justification.’ Southern Journal of Philosophy, 31(3): 373–91.
Sosa, E. 2006. ‘Knowledge: Instrumental and Testimonial.’ In Sosa, E. and Lackey, J. (eds), The Epistemology of Testimony, pp. 116–23. New York: OUP.
Stanley, J. 2005. Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: OUP.
Su, X. and Khoshgoftaar, T. M. 2009. ‘A Survey of Collaborative Filtering Techniques.’ Advances in Artificial Intelligence:
Sunstein, C. 2007. 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tollefsen, D. P. 2009. ‘Wikipedia and the Epistemology of Testimony.’ Episteme, 6: 824.
Williams, M. 2001. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. Oxford: OUP.
Williams, M. 2008. ‘Responsibility and Reliability.’ Philosophical Papers, 37(1): 126.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 89 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 908 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.