Skip to main content Accessibility help

Moderate Epistemic Relativism and Our Epistemic Goals

  • Jonathan M. Weinberg


Although radical forms of relativism are perhaps beyond the epistemological pale, I argue here that a more moderate form may be plausible, and articulate the conditions under which moderate epistemic relativism could well serve our epistemic goals. In particular, as a result of our limitations as human cognizers, we find ourselves needing to investigate the dappled and difficult world by means of competing communities of highly specialized researchers. We would do well, I argue, to admit of the existence of unresolvable disputes between such communities, but only so long as there is a sufficient amount of fruitful exchange between them as well. I close with some speculation about when it is or is not legitimate to make an “appeal to discipline”: responding to another’s argument by saying something like, “we should do it this way, because we are philosophers (/linguists/psychologists/…), and that’s just what we do”.



Hide All
Allen, Colin. 2004. “Is Anyone a Cognitive Ethologist?Biology & Philosophy 19: 589607.
Almeder, Robert. 1998. Harmless Naturalism: The Limits of Science and the Nature of Philosophy. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.
Boghossian, Paul. 2006. Fear of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BonJour, Laurence. 1994. “Against Naturalized Epistemology.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19: 283300.
BonJour, Laurence. 1998. In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brooks, Rodney. 1991. “Intelligence Without Representation.” Artificial Intelligence, 47: 139159.
Buller, David. 2005. Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carey, Susan. 2002. “Evidence for Numerical Abilities in Young Infants: A Fatal Flaw?Developmental Science 5 (2): 202205.
Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chemero, Anthony. 2000. “Anti-representationalism and the Dynamical Stance.” Philosophy of Science 67: 625647.
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. “Review of Verbal Behavior by B. F. Skinner.” Language 35: 2658.
Cohen, Leslie and Kathryn, Marks. 2002. “How Infants Process Addition and Subtraction Events.” Developmental Science 5: 186201.
Craig, Edward. 1990. Knowledge and the State of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dawes, Robyn. 1990. “The Potential Nonfalsity of the False Consensus Effect.” Pp. 179199 in Hogarth, R. M., ed., Insights into Decision Making. University of Chicago Press
Dupre, John. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Eliasmith, Chris. 1996. “The Third Contender: A Critical Examination of the Dynamicist Theory of Cognition.” Philosophical Psychology 9: 441463.
Fagan, Melinda. 2007. “The Search for the Hematopoietic Stem Cell: Social Interaction and Epistemic Success in Immunology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 38: 217237.
Feigenson, Lisa, Carey, Susan, and Elizabeth, Spelke. 2002. “Infants' Discrimination of Number vs. Continuous Extent.” Cognitive Psychology 44: 3366.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against Method. London: Verso.
Friedman, Michael. 2001. Dynamics of Reason. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Fumerton, Richard. 1995. Metaepistemology and Skepticism. Lanham, Maryland: Rowmanand Littlefield.
Galison, Peter. 1997. Image & Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 1991a. “From Tools to Theories: A Heuristic for Discovery in Cognitive Psychology.” Psychological Review 98: 254267.
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 1991b. “How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristics and Biases.” European Review of Social Psychology 2: 83115.
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Todd, Peter, and the ABC Group. 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, Alvin. 1987. “Foundations of Social Epistemics.” Synthese 73: 109144.
Goldman, Alvin. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haack, Susan. 1994. Evidence and Inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Hales, Steven. 1997. “A Consistent Relativism.” Mind 106: 3352.
Hempel, Carl. 1966. The Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Horgan, Terrence and John, Tienson. 1989. “Representations without Rules.” Philosophical Topics 17: 2743.
Kim, Jaegwon. 1988. “What is ‘Naturalized Epistemology’?Philosophical Perspectives 2: 381405.
Kitcher, Philip. 1993. The Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kobayashi, Tessei, Hiraki, Kazuo, Mugitani, Ryoko, and Hasegawa, Toshikazu. 2004. “Baby Arithmetic: One Object Plus One Tone.” Cognition 91: B23–B34.
Kornblith, Hilary. 2002. Knowledge and its Place in Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kvanvig, Jonathan. 2003. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laudan, Larry. 1987. “Progress or Rationality? The Prospects for Normative Naturalism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 24: 1931.
Laudan, Larry. 1990. “Aim-less Epistemology.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 21: 315322.
Lipton, Peter. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Longino, Helen. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Machery, Edouard and Clark, Barrett. 2006. “Debunking Adapting Minds.” Philosophy of Science 73: 232246.
Maffie, James. 2000. “Alternative Epistemologies and the Value of Truth.” Social Epistemology 14: 247257.
Mix, Kelly. 2002. “Trying to Build on Shifting Sand: Commentary on Cohen and Marks.” Developmental Science 5 (2): 205206.
Neta, Ram. 2006. “Epistemology Factualized: New Contractarian Foundations for Epistemology.” Synthese 150: 247280.
Nielsen, Kai. 1993. “Relativism and Wide Reflective Equilibrium.” Monist 76: 316332.
Owens, David. 2006. “Testimony and Assertion.” Philosophical Studies 130: 105129.
Paradis, Cardita. 2003. “Is the Notion of Linguistic Competence Relevant in Cognitive Linguistics?Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 1: 207231.
Penke, Martina and Rosenbach, Annette. 2004. “What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics?Studies in Language 28: 480526.
Pollock, John. 1987. “Defeasible Reasoning.” Cognitive Science 11: 481518.
Quine, W. V. O. and Joseph, Ullian. 1978. The Web of Belief, 2nd edn. New York: Random House.
Schmitt, Frederick. 2000. “Veritistic Value.” Social Epistemology 14: 259280.
Solomon, Miriam. 2001. Social Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sosa, Ernest. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stich, Stephen. 1988. “Reflective Equilibrium, Analytic Epistemology and the Problem of Cognitive Diversity.” Synthese 74: 391413.
Stich, Stephen. 1990. The Fragmentation of Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thelen, Esther, Schöner, Gregor, Scheier, Christian, and Linda, Smith. 2001. “The Dynamics of Embodiment: A Field Theory of Infant Perseverative Reaching.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 134.
Thelen, Esther and Linda, Smith. 1994. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
van, Gelder Timothy and Robert, Port. 1995. “It's About Time: An Overview of the Dynamical Approach to Cognition.” Pp. 143 in Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, eds. Gelder, van and Port.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
VanMarle, Kristy and Karen, Wynn. 2003. “Tone Discrimination by 6-month-old Infants.” Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, Florida.
Vranas, Peter. 2000. “Gigerenzer's Normative Critique of Kahneman and Tversky.” Cognition 76: 179193.
Weinberg, Jonathan. 2006. “What's Epistemology For? The Case for Neopragmatism in Normative Metaepistemology.” Pp. 2647 in Hetherington, S., ed. Epistemology Futures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weinberg, Jonathan, Nichols, Shaun, and Stephen, Stich. 2001. “Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions.” Philosophical Topics 29 (1/2): 429460.
Xu, Fei. 2003. “Numerosity Discrimination in Infants: Evidence for Two Systems of Representation.” Cognition 89: B15–B25.
Xu, Fei, Spelke, Elizabeth, and Sydney, Goddard. 2005. “Number Sense in Human Infants.” Developmental Science 8: 88101.
Zagzebski, Linda. 1996. Virtues of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed