Skip to main content
×
×
Home

ON A NO DEFEAT EVIDENCE PRINCIPLE OF TAL AND COMESAÑA

  • Randall G. Mccutcheon
Abstract

We offer a critical evaluation of a recent proposal of E. Tal and J. Comesaña on the topic of when evidence of evidence constitutes evidence. After establishing that attempts of L. Moretti and W. Roche to discredit the proposal miss their mark, we fashion another, which does not.

Copyright
Corresponding author
rmcctchn@memphis.edu
References
Hide All
Feldman, R. 2014. ‘Evidence of Evidence is Evidence.’ In Matheson, J. and Vitz, R. (eds), The Ethics of Belief, pp. 284–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fitelson, B. 2012. ‘Evidence of Evidence is Not (Necessarily) Evidence.’ Analysis, 72: 85–8.
Jeffrey, R. 1965. The Logic of Decision. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Moretti, L. 2016. ‘Tal and Comesaña on Evidence of Evidence.’ The Reasoner, 10: 38–9.
Roche, W. 2014. ‘Evidence of Evidence Is Evidence under Screening-Off.’ Episteme, 11: 119–24.
Roche, W. 2018. ‘Is Evidence of Evidence Evidence? Screening-Off vs. No-Defeaters.’ Episteme. Forthcoming.
Tal, E. and Comesaña, J. 2017. ‘Is Evidence of Evidence Evidence?Nous, 51: 95112.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Episteme
  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 13 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 94 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 12th March 2018 - 17th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.