Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

On Trusting Wikipedia

  • P. D. Magnus

Abstract

Given the fact that many people use Wikipedia, we should ask: Can we trust it? The empirical evidence suggests that Wikipedia articles are sometimes quite good but that they vary a great deal. As such, it is wrong to ask for a monolithic verdict on Wikipedia. Interacting with Wikipedia involves assessing where it is likely to be reliable and where not. I identify five strategies that we use to assess claims from other sources and argue that, to a greater of lesser degree, Wikipedia frustrates all of them. Interacting responsibly with something like Wikipedia requires new epistemic methods and strategies.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Auer, Nicole and Sebek, Robert. 2007. “Bibliography on Evaluating Web Information.” Retrieved November 2, 2008, from http://www.lib.vt.edu/help/instruct/evaluate/evalbiblio.html
Bragues, George. 2007. “Wiki-Philosophizing in a Marketplace of Ideas: Evaluating Wikipedia's Entries on Seven Great Minds.” Working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=978177
Cohen, Noam. 2007. “A History Department Bans Citing Wikipedia as a Research Source.” New York Times, February 21. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/education/21wikipedia.html
Collins, Harry, Evans, Rob, Ribeiro, Rodrigo, and Hall, Martin. 2006. “Experiments with Interactional Expertise.” Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37(4): 656–74.
Doctorow, Cory. 2006. “On ‘Digital Maoism: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism’ by Jaron Lanier.” Edge. http://www.edge.org/discourse/digital_maoism.html
Encyclopædia Britannica. 2006. “Fatally Flawed: Refuting the Recent Study on Encyclopedic Accuracy by the Journal Nature.” http://corporate.britannica.com/britannica_nature_response.pdf
Fallis, Don. 2008. “Toward an Epistemology of Wikipedia.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(10): 1662–74.
Frické, Martin and Fallis, Don. 2003. “Indicators of Accuracy for Answers to Ready Reference Questions on the Internet.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55(3): 238–45.
Gedda, Rodney. 2008. “Wikipedia Breeds ‘Unwitting Trust’ Says IT Professor.” Computerworld, April 14. http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;1828979092
Giles, Jim. 2005. “Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head to Head.” Nature 438: 900–1.
Halavais, Alex. 2004. “The Isuzu Experiment.” Blog entry at A Thaumaturgical Compendium. http://alex.halavais.net/index.php?p=794
Lanier, Jaron. 2006. “Digital Maoism: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism.” Edge. http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier06/lanier06_index.html
Magnus, P. D. 2001. “Reliability on the Crowded Net: Finding the Truth in a Web of Deceit.” MacHack 16 (Proceedings). MacHack: The Conference for Leading Edge Developers. http://hdl.handle.net/1951/25991
Magnus, P. D. 2006. “Epistemology and the Wikipedia.” Paper presented at the North American Computing and Philosophy Conference, Troy, New York. http://hdl.handle.net/1951/42589
Magnus, P. D. 2008. “Early Response to False Claims in Wikipedia.” First Monday 13(9). http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2115/2027
Nature. 2006. “Britannica Attacks… and We Respond.” 440: 582.
Read, Brock. 2006. “Can Wikipedia EverMake the Grade?” The Chronicle of Higher Education 53(10): A31. http://chronicle.com/free/v53/i10/10a03101.htm
Stross, Randall. 2006. “Anonymous Source Is Not the Same as Open Source.” New York Times, March 12. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/12/business/yourmoney/12digi.html
Tynan, Dan. 2008. “The Truth Is Out There… Somewhere.” US Airways Magazine, January: 42.
Wikipedia contributors. “Wikipedia:Academic use.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved July 19, 2008, from http://en.Wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Academic_use&oldid=226679146
Wunderlich, Mark E. 2008. “Error-Avoidance Reliabilism.” Unpublished draft.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed