Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Premises of Condorcet's Jury Theorem Are Not Simultaneously Justified

Abstract
ABSTRACT

Condorcet's famous jury theorem reaches an optimistic conclusion on the correctness of majority decisions, based on two controversial premises about voters: they are competent and vote independently, in a technical sense. I carefully analyse these premises and show that: (i) whether a premise is justified depends on the notion of probability considered and (ii) none of the notions renders both premises simultaneously justified. Under the perhaps most interesting notions, the independence assumption should be weakened.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Austen-Smith D. and Banks J.. 1996. “Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” American Political Science Review 90: 3445.
Ben-Yashar R. and Paroush J.. 2000. “A Nonasymptotic Condorcet Jury Theorem.” Social Choice and Welfare 17: 189–99.
Berend D. and Paroush J.. 1998. “When Is Condorcet's Jury Theorem Valid?Social Choice and Welfare 15: 481–8.
Boland P. J. 1989. “Majority Systems and the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” Statistician 38: 181–9.
Boland P. J., Proschan F., and Tong Y. L.. 1989. “Modelling Dependence in Simple and Indirect Majority Systems.” Journal of Applied Probability 26: 81–8.
Bovens L. and Rabinowicz W.. 2006. “Democratic Answers to Complex Questions: An Epistemic Perspective.” Synthese 150(1): 131–53.
Condorcet M. J. A. C. 1785. “Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité rendues à la pluralité des voix.” Les Archives de la Révolution Française. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Conghlan P. 2000. “In Defense of Unanimous Jury Verdicts: Mistrials, Communication, and Strategic Voting.” American Political Science Review 94(2): 375–93.
Dietrich F. and List C.. 2004. “A Model of Jury Decisions Where All Judges Have the Same Evidence.” Synthese 142: 175202.
Estlund D. 1994. “Opinion Leaders, Independence, and Condorcet's Jury Theorem.” Theory and Decision 36(2): 131–62.
Estlund D. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Estlund D.,7 Waldron J., Grofman B., and Feld S.. 1989. “Democratic Theory and the Public Interest: Condorcet and Rousseau Revisited.” American Political Science Review 83(4): 1317–40.
Feddersen T. and Pesendorfer W.. 1997. “Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information.” Econometrica 65(5): 1029–58.
Grofman B., Owen G., and Feld S. L.. 1983. “Thirteen Theorems in Search of the Truth.” Theory and Decision 15: 261–78.
Koriyama Y. and Szentes B.. 1995. “A Resurrection of the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” Working paper. University of Chicago.
Ladha K. K. 1992. “The Condorcet Jury Theorem, Free Speech, and Correlated Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 617–34.
Ladha K. K. 1993. “Condorcet's Jury Theorem in Light of De Finetti's Theorem.” Social Choice and Welfare 10: 6985.
Ladha K. K. 1995. “Information Pooling Through Majority-rule Voting: Condorcet's Jury Theorem with Correlated Votes.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 26: 353–72.
Lindley D. 1985. “Reconciliation of Discrete Probability Distributions.” In Bernando J. M. et al. (eds.), Bayesian Statistics, vol. 2, pp. 375–90. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
List C. Forthcoming. “The Epistemology of Special Majority Voting.” Social Choice and Welfare.
List C. and Goodin R. E.. 2001. “Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” Journal of Political Philosophy 9: 277306.
List C. and Pettit P.. 2004. “An Epistemic Free Riding Problem?” In Catton P. and Macdonald G. (eds.), Karl Popper: Critical Appraisals, pp. 128–58. London: Routledge.
Miller N. R. 1986. “Information, Elections, and Democracy: Some Extensions and Interpretations of the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” In Grofman B. and Owen G. (eds.), Information Pooling and Group Decision Making. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Nitzan S. and Paroush J.. 1984. “The Significance of Independent Decisions in Uncertain Dichotomous Choice Situations.” Theory and Decision 17: 4760.
Nitzan S. and Paroush J.. 1985. Collective Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Owen G. 1986. “‘Fair’ Indirect Majority Rules.” In Grofman B. and Owen G. (eds.), Information Pooling and Group Decision Making. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pearl J. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rawls J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reichenbach H. 1956. The Direction of Time. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Young H. P. 1988. “Condorcet's Theory of Voting.” American Political Science Review 82: 1231–44.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Episteme
  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 18 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 124 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.