Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

SKEPTICISM ABOUT META-SKEPTICISM: MEDITATIONS ON EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY

  • Michael Hannon
Abstract

Drawing on new empirical data, a group of experimental philosophers have argued that one of the most popular and influential forms of skepticism is much less interesting and much less worrisome than philosophers have thought. Contrary to this claim, I argue that this brand of skepticism remains as threatening as ever. My argument also reveals an important limitation of experimental philosophy and sheds light on the way professional philosophers should go about the business of doing philosophy.

Copyright
Corresponding author
mhannon09@gmail.com
References
Hide All
Alexander, J. 2012. Experimental Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Alexander, J. and Weinberg, J. 2007. ‘Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy.’ Philosophy Compass, 2: 5680.
Bealer, G. 1998. ‘Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy.’ In DePaul, M. and Ramsey, W. (eds), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, pp. 201–40. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
BonJour, L. 2010. ‘The Myth of Knowledge.’ Philosophical Perspectives, 24: 5783.
Cohen, S. 1999. ‘Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons.’ Philosophical Perspectives, 13: 5789.
Cullen, S. 2010. ‘Survey-Driven Romanticism.’ Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1: 275–96.
DeRose, K. 1999. ‘Introduction.’ In DeRose, K. and Warfield, T.A. (eds), Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader, pp. 126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeRose, K. 1995. ‘Solving the Skeptical Problem.’ Philosophical Review, 104: 152.
Deutsch, M. 2010. ‘Experimental Philosophy, Intuitions, and Counter-Examples.’ Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1: 447–60.
Dretske, F. 1970. ‘Epistemic Operators.’ Journal of Philosophy, 67: 1007–23.
Frederick, S. 2005. ‘Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19: 2542.
Gettier, E. 1963. ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?Analysis, 23: 121123.
Hales, S. 2006. Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hannon, M. 2015. ‘The Universal Core of Knowledge.’ Synthese, 192: 769–86.
Hawthorne, J. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kauppinen, A. 2007. ‘The Rise and Fall of Experimental Philosophy.’ Philosophical Explorations, 10: 95118.
Kelly, T. 2008. ‘Evidence: Fundamental Concepts and the Phenomenal Conception.’ Philosophy Compass, 3: 933–55.
Kornblith, H. 2002. Knowledge and its Place in Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kornblith, H. 2007. ‘Naturalism and Intuitions.’ Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74: 2749.
Lewis, D. 1983. Philosophical Papers: Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. 1996. ‘Elusive Knowledge.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74: 549567.
Ludwig, K. 2007. ‘The Epistemology of Thought Experiments: First Person Versus Third Person Approaches.’ In French, P. A. and Wettstein, H. K. (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, pp. 128–59. Oxford: Blackwell.
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., and Stich, S. 2004. ‘Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style.’ Cognition, 92: 112.
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., and Stich, S. 2012. ‘If Folk Intuitions Vary, Then What?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86: 618–35.
McGinn, C. 1993. Problems in Philosophy: The Limits of Inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mortensen, K. and Nagel, J. Forthcoming. ‘Armchair-Friendly Experimental Philosophy.’ In Sytsma, J. and Buckwalter, W. (eds), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nagel, J. 2010. ‘Knowledge Ascriptions and the Psychological Consequences of Thinking About Error.’ Philosophical Quarterly, 60: 286306.
Nagel, J. 2012. ‘Mindreading in Gettier Cases and Skeptical Pressure Cases.’ In Brown, J. and Gerken, M. (eds), Knowledge Ascriptions, pp. 171191. Oxford University Press.
Nagel, J., San Juan, V., and Mar, R. 2013. ‘Authentic Gettier Cases: A Reply to Starmans and Friedman.’ Cognition, 129: 666–9.
Nichols, S., Stich, S., and Weinberg, J. 2012. ‘Meta-Skepticism: Meditations in Ethno-Epistemology.’ In Stich, S. (ed.), Knowledge, Rationality, and Morality, 1978–2010, pp. 224–6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nozick, R. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schiffer, S. 1996. ‘Contextualist Solutions to Scepticism.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 96: 317–33.
Schulz, E., Cokely, E. T., and Feltz, A. 2011. ‘Persistent Bias in Expert Judgments about Free Will and Moral Responsibility: A Test of the Expertise Defense.’ Consciousness and Cognition, 20: 1722–31.
Schwitzgebel, E. and Cushman, F. 2012. ‘Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers.’ Mind and Language, 27: 135–53.
Sosa, E. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stanley, J. 2005. Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stich, S. and Weinberg, J. 2001. ‘Jackson's Empirical Assumptions.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62: 637–43.
Stroud, B. 1984. The Significance of Philosophical Skepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Thompson, J. J. 1985. ‘The Trolley Problem.’ Yale Law Journal, 94: 1395–415.
Turri, J. 2015. ‘Skeptical Appeal: The Source-Content Bias.’ Cognitive Science, 39: 307–24.
van Inwagen, P. 1997. ‘Materialism and the Psychological-Continuity Account of Personal Identity.’ Philosophical Perspectives, 11: 305–19.
Weinberg, J. and Alexander, J. 2014. ‘The Challenge of Sticking with Intuitions through Thick and Thin.’ In Booth, A. and Rowbottom, D. (eds), Intuitions, pp. 187–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, B. 1973. Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson, T. 2005. ‘Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge.’ Philosophical Quarterly, 55: 213–35.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Episteme
  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed