Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • Charlie Crerar


In Epistemic Injustice (2007), Miranda Fricker has insightfully introduced the notion of a hermeneutical injustice, where historic conditions of marginalisation serve to deprive individuals of the appropriate hermeneutical resources with which to render significant patches of their experience fully intelligible to themselves and others. In this paper I draw attention to a shortcoming in Fricker's account: that the only hermeneutical resource she acknowledges is a shared conceptual framework. Consequently, Fricker creates the impression that hermeneutical injustice manifests itself almost exclusively in the form of a conceptual lacuna. Considering the negative hermeneutical impact of certain societal taboos, however, suggests that there can be cases of hermeneutical injustice even when an agent's conceptual repertoire is perfectly adequate. I argue that this observation highlights the need to expand Fricker's account to accommodate a wider range of hermeneutical resources and, in turn, a broader taxonomy of hermeneutical injustice. Specifically, my central case of a societal taboo presses the need to recognize as a valuable hermeneutical resource an expressively free environment, in which individuals can put their conceptual-interpretative resources to good hermeneutical effect.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Allan, K. and Burridge, K. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, E. 2012. ‘Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions.’ Social Epistemology, 26: 163–73.
Bobel, C. 2010. New Blood: Third Wave Feminism and the Politics of Menstruation. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Britton, C. K. 1996. ‘Learning about “The Curse” – An anthropological Perspective on Experiences of Menstruation.’ Women's Studies International Forum, 19: 645–53.
Cooper, S. C. and Koch, P. B. 2007. ‘“Nobody told me nothing”: Communication about Menstruation among Low-income African American Women.’ Women & Health, 46: 5778.
Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fricker, M. 2013a. ‘Epistemic Justice as a Condition of Political Freedom?Synthese, 190: 1317–32.
Fricker, M. 2013b. ‘How is Hermeneutical Injustice Related To “White Ignorance”? Reply to José Medina's ‘Hermeneutical Injustice and Polyphonic Contextualism: Social Silences and Shared Hermeneutical Responsibilities.’ Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2: 4953.
Houppert, K. 1999. The Curse: Confronting the Last Unmentionable Taboo: Menstruation. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Houston, A. M., Abraham, A., Huang, Z., and D'Angelo, L. J. 2006. ‘Knowledge, Attitudes, and Consequences of Menstrual Health in Urban Adolescent Females.’ Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 19: 271–5.
Kissling, E. 2002. ‘On the Rag on Screen: Menarche in Film and Television.’ Sex Roles, 46: 512. 2009. Laádan to English dictionary.
Lee, J. and Sasser-Coen, J. 1996. ‘Memories of Menarche: Older Women Remember their First Period.’ Journal of Aging Studies, 10: 83101.
McPherson, M. E. and Korfine, L. 2004. ‘Menstruation Across Time: Menarche, Menstrual Attitudes, Experiences, and Behaviours.’ Womens Health Issues, 14: 193200.
Phipps, W. E. 1980. ‘The Menstrual Taboo in the Judeo-Christian Tradition.’ Journal of Religion and Health, 19: 298303.
Roy, A. 2004. ‘The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize Lecture.’ Delivered at The Sydney Peace Prize: The University of Sydney.
Strange, J-M. 2001. ‘The assault on Ignorance: Teaching Menstrual Etiquette in English Schools.’ Social History of Medicine, 14: 247–65.


  • Charlie Crerar


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed