Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:23:23.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VIRTUOUS INSIGHTFULNESS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2016

J. Adam Carter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Insight often strikes us blind; when we aren't expecting it, we suddenly see a connection that previously eluded us – a kind of Aha! experience. People with a propensity to such experiences are regarded as insightful, and insightfulness is a paradigmatic intellectual virtue. What's not clear, however, is just what it is in virtue of which being such that these experiences tend to happen to one renders one intellectually virtuous. This paper draws from both virtue epistemology as well as empirical work on the psychology of problem solving and creativity to make some inroads in accounting for insightfulness as an intellectual virtue. Important to the view advanced is that virtuously insightful individuals manifest certain skills which both cultivate insight experiences (even if not by directly bringing them about) and enable such individuals to move in an epistemically responsible way from insight experience to epistemic endorsement.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 539 - 554
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alfano, M. 2012. ‘Expanding the Situationist Challenge to Responsibilist Virtue Epistemology.’ Philosophical Quarterly, 62: 223–49.Google Scholar
Baehr, J. 2011. The Inquiring Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Battaly, H. 2008. ‘Virtue Epistemology.’ Philosophy Compass, 3: 639–63.Google Scholar
Boghossian, P. 2006. Fear of Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brady, M. 2013. Emotional Insight: The Epistemic Role of Emotional Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, B. A. and Cruse, D. F. 1988. ‘The Incubation Effect: Illusion or Illumination?’ Human Performance, 1: 177–85.Google Scholar
Carter, J. A. and Gordon, E. C. 2014. ‘Openmindedness and Truth.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 44: 207–24.Google Scholar
Carter, J. A., Jarvis, B. and Rubin, K. 2015. ‘Varieties of Cognitive Achievement.’ Philosophical Studies, 172: 181–99.Google Scholar
Chronicle, E. P., Ormerod, T. C. and MacGregor, J. N. 2001. ‘When Insight Just Won't Come: The Failure of Visual Cues in the Nine-Dot Problem.’ Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 54: 903–19.Google Scholar
Dodds, R. A., Ward, T. B. and Smith, S. M. 2003. ‘A Review of the Experimental Literature on Incubation in Problem Solving and Creativity.’ Creativity Research Handbook, 3: 285–302.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1970. ‘Epistemic Operators.’ Journal of Philosophy, 67: 1007–23.Google Scholar
Elgin, C. Z. 1999. Considered Judgment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, E. C. 2016. ‘Understanding in Epistemology’. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 1999. ‘Agent Reliabilism’. Noûs, 33: 273–96.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2003. ‘Knowledge as Credit for True Belief.’ In DePaul, M. and Zagzebski, L.. (eds), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives From Ethics and Epistemology, pp. 111–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2008. ‘What's Wrong With Contextualism?’ Philosophical Quarterly, 58: 416–36.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2010a. ‘Achieving Knowledge.’ In A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2010b. Achieving Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J. 2012. ‘A (Different) Virtue Epistemology.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85: 1–26.Google Scholar
Grimm, S. 2010. ‘Understanding.’ In Bernecker, S. and Pritchard, D. (eds), Routledge Companion to Epistemology, pp. 84–94. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grimm, S. 2012. ‘Understanding as Knowledge of Causes.’ Virtue Scientia: Essays in Philosophy of Science and Virtue Epistemology. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Hélie, S. and Sun, R. 2010. ‘Incubation, Insight, and Creative Problem Solving: A Unified Theory and a Connectionist Model.’ Psychological Review, 117: 994–1024.Google Scholar
Hidi, S. and Baird, W. 1986. ‘Interestingness – A Neglected Variable in Discourse Processing.’ Cognitive Science, 10: 179–94.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. 2001. ‘The Authority of Affect*.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63: 181–214.Google Scholar
Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., Reber, P. J. and Kounios, J. 2004. ‘Neural Activity When People Solve Verbal Problems with Insight.’ PLoS Biology, 2: e97. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020097.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. R. 2011. Yuck!: The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kershaw, T. C. and Ohlsson, S. 2004. ‘Multiple Causes of Difficulty in Insight: The Case of the Nine-Dot Problem.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30: 3.Google Scholar
Klauer, K. C., Musch, J. and Naumer, B. 2000. ‘On Belief Bias in Syllogistic Reasoning.’ Psychological Review, 107: 852.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1996. ‘Elusive Knowledge.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74: 549–67.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, J. 2014. Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and Its Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. and Wiebe, D. 1987. ‘Intuition in Insight and Noninsight Problem Solving.’ Memory and Cognition, 15: 238–46.Google Scholar
Montmarquet, J. 1993. Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Olton, R. M. and Johnson, D. M. 1976. ‘Mechanisms of Incubation in Creative Problem Solving.’ American Journal of Psychology, 89: 617–30.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J. 2004. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2005. Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2009. ‘Knowledge, Understanding and Epistemic Value.’ Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 86: 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2010. ‘Relevant Alternatives, Perceptual Knowledge and Discrimination.’ Noûs, 44: 245–68.Google Scholar
Riggs, W. 2004. ‘Insight, Open-Mindedness and Understanding’. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Riggs, W. 2009. ‘Luck, Knowledge and Control’. In Haddock, A., Millar, A. and Pritchard, D. (eds), Epistemic Value, pp. 204–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. C. 1988. ‘Emotion.’ In The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee290/full.Google Scholar
Rota, G.-C. 1997. ‘The Phenomenology of Mathematical Beauty.’ Synthese, 111: 171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, J. 2001. ‘Knowledge, Relevant Alternatives and Missed Clues.’ Analysis, 61: 202–8.Google Scholar
Segal, E. 2004. ‘Incubation in Insight Problem Solving.’ Creativity Research Journal, 16: 141–8.Google Scholar
Silveira, J. M. 1972. ‘Incubation: The Effect of Interruption Timing and Length on Problem Solution and Quality of Problem Processing’. US: ProQuest Information & Learning.Google Scholar
Singh, S. 1997. Fermat's Last Theorem. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 2009. A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 2011. Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stace, W. T. 1944. ‘Interestingness.’ Philosophy, 19: 233–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. and Davidson, J. E. 1995. The Nature of Insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wallas, G. 1926. ‘The Art of Thought.’ http://doi.apa.org/psycinfo/1926-10372-000.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. 2014. ‘Bounded Gaps between Primes’. Annals of Mathematics, 179: 1121–74.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. J. 1987. ‘Luck and Moral Responsibility.’ Ethics, 97: 374–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar