Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

WE OUGHT TO AGREE: A CONSEQUENCE OF REPAIRING GOLDMAN'S GROUP SCORING RULE

Abstract
Abstract

In Knowledge in a Social World, Alvin Goldman presents a framework to quantify the epistemic effects that various policies, procedures, and behaviors can have on a group of agents. In this essay, I show that the framework requires some modifications when applied to agents with credences. The required modifications carry with them an interesting consequence, namely, that any group whose members disagree can become more accurate by forming a consensus through averaging their credences. I sketch a way that this result can be used to show that individual norms of rationality and group norms of rationality can dictate conflicting behaviors for the members of some groups. I conclude by discussing how some of the assumptions used to generate the consensus result might be loosened.

Copyright
Corresponding author
kopec@wisc.edu
References
Hide All
Foley Richard. 1987. The Theory of Epistemic Rationality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gibbard Alan. 2008. ‘Rational Credence and the Value of Truth.’ In Gendler T. and Hawthorne J. (eds), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, vol. 2, pp. 143–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gillies Donald. 1991. ‘Intersubjective Probability and Confirmation Theory.’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 42: 513–33.
Gneiting Tilmann, and Raftery Adrian. 2007. ‘Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation.’ Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102: 359–78.
Goldman Alvin. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldman Alvin. 2010. ‘Systems-Oriented Social Epistemology.’ In Gendler T. and Hawthorne J. (eds), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, vol. 3, pp. 189214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Joyce James. 1998. ‘A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism.’ Philosophy of Science, 65: 575603.
Joyce James. 2009. ‘Accuracy and Coherence: Prospects for an Alethic Epistemology of Partial Belief.’ In Huber F. and Schmidt-Petri C. (eds), Degrees of Belief, pp. 263–97. New York: Springer.
Kelly Thomas. 2003. ‘Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66: 612–40.
Kitcher Philip. 1992. ‘The Naturalists Return.’ Philosophical Review, 101: 53114.
Kopec Matthew. N.d. ‘Prospects for a Naturalistic Social Epistemology.’
Kornblith Hilary. 1993. ‘Epistemic Normativity.’ Synthese, 94: 357–76.
Lam Barry. Forthcoming. ‘Calibrated Probabilities and the Epistemology of Disagreement.’ Synthese, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-011-9881-0.
Laudan Larry. 1990. ‘Normative Naturalism.’ Philosophy of Science, 57: 4459.
Leitgeb Hannes, and Pettigrew Richard. 2010a. ‘An Objective Justification of Bayesianism I: Measuring Inaccuracy.’ Philosophy of Science, 77: 201–35.
Leitgeb Hannes, and Pettigrew Richard. 2010b. ‘An Objective Justification of Bayesianism II: The Consequences of Minimizing Inaccuracy.’ Philosophy of Science, 77: 236–72.
Lewis David. 1980. ‘A Subjectivist's Guide to Objective Chance.’ Reprinted with postscripts in Lewis (1986).
Lewis David. 1986. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
List Christian, and Pettit Philip. 2011. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lockard Matthew. Forthcoming. ‘Epistemic Instrumentalism.’ Synthese, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-011-9932-6.
Longino Helen. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Longino Helen. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Maher Patrick. 2002. ‘Joyce's Argument for Probabilism.’ Philosophy of Science, 69: 7381.
Mayo-Wilson Conor, Zollman Kevin J.S., and Danks David. 2011. ‘The Independence Thesis: When Individual and Social Epistemology Diverge.’ Philosophy of Science, 78: 653–77.
Predd Joel, Seiringer Robert, Lieb Elliott H., Osherson Daniel, Poor H. Vincent, and Kulkarni Sanjeev. 2009. ‘Probabilistic Coherence and Proper Scoring Rules.’ IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 55: 4786–92.
Savage Leonard. 1971. ‘Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations.’ Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66: 783801.
Seidenfeld Teddy. 1985. ‘Calibration, Coherence, and Scoring Rules.’ Philosophy of Science, 52: 274–94.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Episteme
  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 140 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.