Skip to main content

Web 2.0 vs. the Semantic Web: A Philosophical Assessment

  • Luciano Floridi

The paper develops some of the conclusions, reached in Floridi (2007), concerning the future developments of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and their impact on our lives. The two main theses supported in that article were that, as the information society develops, the threshold between online and offline is becoming increasingly blurred, and that once there won't be any significant difference, we shall gradually re-conceptualise ourselves not as cyborgs but rather as inforgs, i.e. socially connected, informational organisms. In this paper, I look at the development of the so-called Semantic Web and Web 2.0 from this perspective and try to forecast their future. Regarding the Semantic Web, I argue that it is a clear and well-defined project, which, despite some authoritative views to the contrary, is not a promising reality and will probably fail in the same way AI has failed in the past. Regarding Web 2.0, I argue that, although it is a rather ill-defined project, which lacks a clear explanation of its nature and scope, it does have the potentiality of becoming a success (and indeed it is already, as part of the new phenomenon of Cloud Computing) because it leverages the only semantic engines available so far in nature, us. I conclude by suggesting what other changes might be expected in the future of our digital environment.

Hide All
Anderson, Nate. 2006. “Tim Berners-Lee on Web 2.0: ‘Nobody Even Knows What It Means’.” Ars Technica. Retrieved 2 November 2008, from
Berners-Lee, Tim and Fischetti, Mark. 1999. Weaving the Web: Origins and Future of the World Wide Web. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
Berners-Lee, Tim, Hendler, James, and Lassila, Ora. 2001. “The Semantic Web.” Scientific American 284(5): 3443. Retrieved 2 November 2008, from
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1992. What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Duguid, Paul. 2006. “Limits of Self-Organization: Peer Production and Laws of Quality.” First Monday. Retrieved 2 November 2008, from
The Economist. 2008. “Blogging – Oh, Grow Up”. 8 November.
Floridi, Luciano. 2005. “Information, Semantic Conceptions of.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Floridi, Luciano. 2007. “A Look into the Future Impact of ICT on Our Lives.” The Information Society 23(1): 5964.
Floridi, Luciano. 2008a. “Data.” In Darity, W. A. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. London: Macmillan.
Floridi, Luciano. 2008b. “The Method of Levels of Abstraction.” Minds and Machines 18(3): 303–29.
Floridi, Luciano. 2008c. “Artificial Intelligence's New Frontier: Artificial Companions and the Fourth Revolution.” Metaphilosophy 39(4/5): 651–5.
Floridi, Luciano, Taddeo, Mariarosaria, and Turilli, Matteo. Forthcoming. “Turing's Imitation Game: Still a Challenge for Any Machine and Some Judges.” Minds and Machines.
McCarthy, John. 1997. “AI as Sport.” Science 276(5318): 1518–9.
O'Reilly, Tim. 2006. “Web 2.0 Compact Definition: Trying Again”. Retrieved 4 March 2007, from
Shadbolt, Nigel, Berners-Lee, Tim, and Hall, Wendy. 2006. “The Semantic Web Revisited.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3): 96101.
Vaas, Lisa. 2007. “Striptease Used to Recruit Help in Cracking Sites”. Retrieved 31 October 2008, from,2817,2210674,00.asp
W3C. 2008a. “W3C Semantic Web Activity.” Retrieved 31 October 2008, from
W3C. 2008b. “W3C Semantic Web Frequently Asked Questions.” Retrieved 31 October 2008, from
Wikipedia contributors. “Cloud computing.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Wikipedia contributors. “Dublin Core.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 31 October 2008, from
Wikipedia contributors. “Infosphere.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Wikipedia contributors. “Web 2.0.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 31 October 2008, from
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed