Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T19:12:07.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Co-induction in dynamical systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2011

School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia (email:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia (email: School of Mathematical Sciences and LMNS, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, PR China (email:


If a countable amenable group G contains an infinite subgroup Γ, one may define, from a measurable action of Γ, the so-called co-induced measurable action of G. These actions were defined and studied by Dooley, Golodets, Rudolph and Sinelsh’chikov. In this paper, starting from a topological action of Γ, we define the co-induced topological action of G. We establish a number of properties of this construction, notably, that the G-action has the topological entropy of the Γ-action and has uniformly positive entropy (completely positive entropy, respectively) if and only if the Γ-action has uniformly positive entropy (completely positive entropy, respectively). We also study the Pinsker algebra of the co-induced action.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


[1]Blanchard, F.. Fully positive topological entropy and topological mixing. Symbolic Dynamics and its Applications (Contemporary Mathematics, 135). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1992, pp. 95105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Blanchard, F.. A disjointness theorem involving topological entropy. Bull. Soc. Math. France 121(4) (1993), 465478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Blanchard, F., Glasner, E. and Host, B.. A variation on the variational principle and applications to entropy pairs. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 17(1) (1997), 2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Blanchard, F., Host, B., Maass, A., Martinez, S. and Rudolph, D. J.. Entropy pairs for a measure. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 15(4) (1995), 621632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Danilenko, A. I.. Entropy theory from the orbital point of view. Monatsh. Math. 134(2) (2001), 121141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Dooley, A. H. and Golodets, V. Ya.. The spectrum of completely positive entropy actions of countable amenable groups. J. Funct. Anal. 196(1) (2002), 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Dooley, A. H., Golodets, V. Ya., Rudolph, D. J. and Sineĺshchikov, S. D.. Non-Bernoulli systems with completely positive entropy. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 28(1) (2008), 87124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Feldman, J.. New K-automorphisms and a problem of Kakutani. Israel J. Math. 24(1) (1976), 1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Glasner, E.. A simple characterization of the set of μ-entropy pairs and applications. Israel J. Math. 102 (1997), 1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Glasner, E., Thouvenot, J.-P. and Weiss, B.. Entropy theory without a past. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 20(5) (2000), 13551370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Glasner, E. and Ye, X.. Local entropy theory. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 29(2) (2009), 321356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Hoffman, C.. A K counterexample machine. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 351(10) (1999), 42634280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Huang, W. and Ye, X.. A local variational relation and applications. Israel J. Math. 151 (2006), 237279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Huang, W., Ye, X. and Zhang, G. H.. A local variational principle for conditional entropy. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 26(1) (2006), 219245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Huang, W., Ye, X. and Zhang, G. H.. Relative entropy tuples, relative U.P.E. and C.P.E. extensions. Israel J. Math. 158 (2007), 249283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Huang, W., Ye, X. and Zhang, G. H.. Local entropy theory for a countable discrete amenable group action. Preprint, 2006, arXiv:1005.1335v1.Google Scholar
[17]del Junco, A.. Bernoulli shifts induced by K-automorphisms. Adv. Math. 25(1) (1977), 3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Kalikow, S. A.. T,T −1 transformation is not loosely Bernoulli. Ann. of Math. (2) 115(2) (1982), 393409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Ollagnier, J. M. and Pinchon, D.. The variational principle. Studia Math. 72(2) (1982), 151159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Ornstein, D. S.. An example of a Kolmogorov automorphism that is not a Bernoulli shift. Adv. Math. 10 (1973), 4962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Ornstein, D. S.. A K automorphism with no square root and Pinsker’s conjecture. Adv. Math. 10 (1973), 89102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Ornstein, D. S.. Ergodic Theory, Randomness, and Dynamical Systems (Yale Mathematical Monographs, 5). Yale University Press, New Haven, CT–London, 1974.Google Scholar
[23]Ornstein, D. S. and Shields, P. C.. An uncountable family of K-automorphisms. Adv. Math. 10 (1973), 6388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Ornstein, D. S. and Weiss, B.. Entropy and isomorphism theorems for actions of amenable groups. J. Anal. Math. 48 (1987), 1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Rudolph, D. J.. Two non-isomorphic K-automorphisms all of whose powers beyond one are isomorphic. Israel J. Math. 27(3–4) (1977), 277298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Rudolph, D. J. and Weiss, B.. Entropy and mixing for amenable group actions. Ann. of Math. (2) 151(3) (2000), 11191150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Stepin, A. M. and Tagi-Zade, A. T.. Variational characterization of topological pressure of the amenable groups of transformations. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 254(3) (1980), 545549 (in Russian).Google Scholar
[28]Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 79). Springer, New York–Berlin, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Ward, T. and Zhang, Q.. The Abramov–Rokhlin entropy addition formula for amenable group actions. Monatsh. Math. 114(3–4) (1992), 317329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar