Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T22:30:19.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The complexity of the collection of measure-distal transformations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2010

Ferenc Beleznay  and
Matthew Foreman
Ferenc Beleznay
Affiliation:
Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
Matthew Foreman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine, CA 92715, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is shown that the collection of measure-distal transformations is a complete co-analytic set and that the Furstenberg order is a -norm. Various other results about skew products are also shown.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 16 , Issue 5 , October 1996 , pp. 929 - 962
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Anzai, H.. Ergodic skew product transformations. Osaka Math. J. 3 (1951), 83–99.Google Scholar
[2]Beleznay, F. and Foreman, M.. The collection of distal flows is not Borel. Amer. J. Math. 117 (1995), 203–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Furstenberg, H.. Recurrence in Ergodic Theory and Combinatorial Number Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1981.Google Scholar
[4]Halmos, P.. Approximation theories for measure preserving transformations. Trans. Am. Math. Sac. 55 (1944), 1–18.Google Scholar
[5]Halmos, P.. In general a measure preserving transformation is mixing. Ann. of Math. 2(45) (1944), 786–792.Google Scholar
[6]Halmos, P.. Lectures on Ergodic Theory. Chelsea, New York, 1956.Google Scholar
[7]Kechris, A.. Classical Descriptive Set Theory (Graduate texts in Mathematics). Springer, 1994.Google Scholar
[8]Moschovakis, Y.. Descriptive Set Theory (Studies in Logic and the Foundation of Mathematics vol. 100). North-Holland, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
[9]Parry, W.. Zero entropy of distal and related transformations. Topological Dynamics. Eds Auslander, J. and Gottschalk, W.. Benjamin, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
[10]Rokhlin, V.. A general measure-preserving transformation is not mixing. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR, (NS) 60 (1948), 349–351.Google Scholar
[11]Zimmer, R. J.. Ergodic actions with generalized discrete spectrum. Illinois J. Math. 20 (1976), 555–588.Google Scholar