Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T04:10:45.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linear stability analysis of the figure-eight orbit in the three-body problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

GARETH E. ROBERTS
GARETH E. ROBERTS*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, 1 College Street, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA 01610, USA (email: groberts@radius.holycross.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that the well-known figure-eight orbit of the three-body problem is linearly stable. Building on the strong amount of symmetry present, the monodromy matrix for the figure-eight is factored so that its stability can be determined from the first twelfth of the orbit. Using a clever change of coordinates, the problem is then reduced to a 2×2 matrix whose entries depend on solutions of the associated linear differential system. These entries are estimated rigorously using only a few steps of a Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg algorithm. From this, we conclude that the characteristic multipliers are distinct and lie on the unit circle. The methods and results presented are applicable to a wide range of Hamiltonian systems containing symmetric periodic solutions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , December 2007 , pp. 1947 - 1963
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Arnaud, M.. On the type of certain periodic orbits minimizing the Lagrangian action. Nonlinearity 11 (1998), 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Birkhoff, G. D.. Dynamical Systems (AMS Colloquium Publications, IX). American Mathematical Society, New York, 1927.Google Scholar
[3]Burden, R. L. and Faires, J. D.. Numerical Analysis, 7th edn. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 2001.Google Scholar
[4]Chen, K.. Action-minimizing orbits in the parallelogram four-body problem with equal masses. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 158 (2001), 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Chen, K.. Variational methods on periodic and quasi-periodic solutions for the N-body problem. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 1691–1715.Google Scholar
[6]Chen, K., Ouyang, T. and Xia, Z.. Action-minimizing periodic and quasi-periodic solutions in the n-body problem. Preprint, 2004.Google Scholar
[7]Chenciner, A.. Action minimizing periodic orbits in the Newtonian n-body problem. Celestial Mechanics (Evanston, IL, 1999) (Contempory Mathematics, 292). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002, pp. 71–90.Google Scholar
[8]Chenciner, A.. Action minimizing solutions of the Newtonian n-body problem: from homology to symmetry. Proc. Int. Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. III (Beijing, 2002). Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2002, pp. 279–294.Google Scholar
[9]Chenciner, A. and Montgomery, R.. A remarkable periodic solution of the three-body problem in the case of equal masses. Ann. of Math. 152 (2000), 881–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Chenciner, A., Féjoz, J. and Montgomery, R.. Rotating eights I: the three Γi families. Nonlinearity 18(3) (2005), 1407–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Chenciner, A., Gerver, J., Montgomery, R. and Simó, C.. Simple choreographic motions of N bodies: a preliminary study. Geometry, Mechanics, and Dynamics. Springer, New York, 2002, pp. 287–308.Google Scholar
[12]Galán, J., Muñoz-Almaraz, F., Freire, E., Doedel, E. and Vanderbauwhede, A.. Stability and bifurcations of the figure-eight solution of the three-body problem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(24) (2002), 4.Google Scholar
[13]Hénon, M.. A family of periodic solutions of the planar three-body problem and their stability. Celestial Mech. 13 (1976), 267–285.Google Scholar
[14]Kapela, T. and Simó, C.. Computer assisted proofs for non-symmetric planar choreographies and for stability of the eight. Nonlinearity 20(5) (2007), 1241–1255.Google Scholar
[15]Lagrange, J. L.. Essai sur le probléme des trois corps. Ouvres 6 (1772), 272–292. Gauthier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar
[16]Moeckel, R.. Linear stability analysis of some symmetrical classes of relative equilibria. Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems (Cincinnati, OH, 1992) (IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications, 63). Springer, New York, 1995, pp. 291–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Moore, C.. Braids in classical dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70(24) (1993), 3675–3679.Google Scholar
[18]Offin, D.. Hyperbolic symmetric periodic orbits in the isosceles three-body problem. Preprint, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Roberts, G.. Linear stability of the elliptic Lagrangian triangle solutions in the three-body problem. J. Differential Equations 182 (2002), 191–218.Google Scholar
[20]Simó, Carles. Dynamical properties of the figure eight solution of the three-body problem. Celestial Mechanics (Evanston, IL, 1999) (Contemporary Mathematics, 292). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002, pp. 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Simó, Carles. New families of solutions in N-body problems. European Congress of Mathematics, Vol. I (Barcelona, 2000) (Progress in Mathematics, 201). Birkhäuser, Basel, 2001, pp. 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar