Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-72crv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T21:37:21.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classifying C1+ structures on dynamical fractals: 2. Embedded trees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2010

A. A. Pinto  and
D. A. Rand
A. A. Pinto
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciencias, Universidade do Porto, 4000 Porto, Portugal
D. A. Rand
Affiliation:
Nonlinear Systems Laboratory, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We classify the C1+α structures on embedded trees. This extends the results of Sullivan on embeddings of the binary tree to trees with arbitrary topology and to embeddings without bounded geometry and with contact points. We used these results in an earlier paper to describe the moduli spaces of smooth conjugacy classes of expanding maps and Markov maps on train tracks. In later papers we will use those results to do the same for pseudo-Anosov diffeomorphisms of surfaces. These results are also used in the classification of renormalisation limits of C1+α diffeomorphisms of the circle.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 15 , Issue 5 , October 1995 , pp. 969 - 992
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1] Pinto, A. A. and Rand, D. A.. Global phase space universality, smooth conjugacies and renormalisation: 2. The Ck+a case using rapid convergence of Markov families. Nonlinearity 4 (1991), 1–31.Google Scholar
[2] Pinto, A. A. and Rand, D. A.. Classifying C1+ structures on dynamical fractals: 1 The moduli space of solenoid functions for Markov maps on train tracks. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 15 (1995), to appear.Google Scholar
[3] Pinto, A. A. and Rand, D. A.. The moduli space of horocycle C1+ smooth diffeomorphisms of the circle with bounded rotation number. In preparation.Google Scholar
[4] Pinto, A. A. and Rand, D. A.. Characterising flexibility and rigidity of pseudo-Anosov and other transversally laminated dynamical systems on surfaces. Warwick Preprint. 1995.Google Scholar
[5] Pinto, A. A.. Convergence of renormalisation and rigidity of dynamical systems. Warwick PhD thesis 1991.Google Scholar
[6] Rand, D. A.. Universality and renormalisation in dynamical systems. In New Directions in Dynamical Systems. Bedford, T. and Swift, J., eds. pp. 1–56. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
[7] Rand, D. A.. Global phase space universality, smooth conjugacies and renormalisation: 1. The C1+B case. Nonlinearity 1 (1988), 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Rand, D. A.. The global rigidity conjecture and convergence of renormalisation. In Workshop on dynamical systems. Papers in honour of Rene Thorn. Coelho, Z. and Shiels, E., eds. pp. 147–155. Longman, London, 1988.Google Scholar
[9] Sullivan, D.. Differentiable structures on fractal-like sets determined by intrinsic scaling functions on dual Cantor sets. In Nonlinear evolution and Chaotic Phenomena. Gallavotti, G. and Zweifel, P., eds. Plenum, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
[10] Sullivan, D.. Quasiconformal homeomorphisms in dynamics, topology and geometry. Proc. Int. Congress of Mathematicians. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1988. pp. 1216–1229.Google Scholar
[11] Sullivan, D.. Bounds, quadratic differentials, and renormalization conjectures. Amer. Math. Soc. Centennial Publications. Volume 2: Mathematics into the Twenty-first Century (1988 Centennial Symposium, August 8-12). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1991.Google Scholar