No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Construction and applications of proximal maps for typical cocycles
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 February 2023
Abstract
For typical cocycles over subshifts of finite type, we show that for any given orbit segment, we can construct a periodic orbit such that it shadows the given orbit segment and that the product of the cocycle along its orbit is a proximal linear map. Using this result, we show that suitable assumptions on the periodic orbits have consequences over the entire subshift.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Abels, H., Margulis, G. and Soifer, G.. Semigroups containing proximal linear maps. Israel J. Math. 91(1–3) (1995), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoist, Y.. Actions propres sur les espaces homogenes réductifs. Ann. of Math. (2) 114 (1996), 315–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoist, Y.. Propriétés asymptotiques des groupes linéaires. Geom. Funct. Anal. 7(1) (1997), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bochi, J. and Gourmelon, N.. Some characterizations of domination. Math. Z. 263(1) (2009), 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bochi, J. and Garibaldi, E.. Extremal norms for fiber-bunched cocycles. J. Éc. polytech. Math. 6 (2019), 947–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, R.. Some systems with unique equilibrium states. Theory Comput. Syst. 8(3) (1974), 193–202.Google Scholar
Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 470), Revised edn. Ed. J.-R. Chazottes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuillard, E. and Sert, C.. The joint spectrum. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 103(3) (2021), 943–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonatti, C. and Viana, M.. Lyapunov exponents with multiplicity 1 for deterministic products of matrices. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 24(5) (2004), 1295–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Y., Feng, D. and Huang, W.. The thermodynamic formalism for sub-additive potentials.
Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 20(3) (2008), 639–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, P. and Klein, S.. Lyapunov Exponents of Linear Cocycles (Atlantis Studies in Dynamical Systems, 3). Springer, Berlin, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, P., Klein, S. and Poletti, M.. Holder continuity of the Lyapunov exponents of linear cocycles over hyperbolic maps, Math. Z. 302 (2022), 2285–2325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D.-J.. Lyapunov exponents for products of matrices and multifractal analysis. Part II: general matrices. Israel J. Math. 170(1) (2009), 355–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D.-J. and Käenmäki, A.. Equilibrium states of the pressure function for products of matrices. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 30(3) (2011), 699–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalinin, B.. Livsic theorem for matrix cocycles. Ann. of Math. (2) 173 (2011), 1025–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassel, F. and Potrie, R.. Eigenvalue gaps for hyperbolic groups and semigroups. J. Mod. Dyn. 18 (2022), 161–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalinin, B. and Sadovskaya, V.. Cocycles with one exponent over partially hyperbolic systems. Geom. Dedicata 167(1) (2013), 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, I. D.. Ergodic properties of matrix equilibrium states. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 38(6) (2018), 2295–2320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, K.. Quasi-multiplicativity of typical cocycles. Comm. Math. Phys. 376 (2020), 1957–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piraino, M.. The weak Bernoulli property for matrix Gibbs states. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 40(8) (2020), 2219–2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, K. and Piraino, M.. Transfer operators and limit laws for typical cocycles. Comm. Math. Phys. 389 (2022), 1475–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sert, C.. Large deviation principle for random matrix products. Ann. Probab. 47(3) (2019), 1335–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velozo Ruiz, R.. Characterization of uniform hyperbolicity for fibre-bunched cocycles. Dyn. Syst. 35(1) (2020), 124–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar