Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-v5rzc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-10T22:38:48.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Escape rates for Gibbs measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2011

ANDREW FERGUSON  and
MARK POLLICOTT
ANDREW FERGUSON
Affiliation:
Mathematics Institute, Zeeman Building, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK (email: a.j.ferguson@warwick.ac.uk, m.pollicott@warwick.ac.uk)
MARK POLLICOTT
Affiliation:
Mathematics Institute, Zeeman Building, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK (email: a.j.ferguson@warwick.ac.uk, m.pollicott@warwick.ac.uk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this paper we study the asymptotic behaviour of the escape rate of a Gibbs measure supported on a conformal repeller through a small hole. There are additional applications to the convergence of the Hausdorff dimension of the survivor set.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , June 2012 , pp. 961 - 988
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

References

[1]Bahsoun, W. and Bose, C.. Quasi-invariant measures, escape rates and the effect of the hole. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 27(3) (2010), 1107–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bowen, R.. Markov partitions and minimal sets for Axiom A diffeomorphisms. Amer. J. Math. 92 (1970), 907–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms, revised edn(Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 470). Springer, Berlin, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Boyle, M., Lind, D. and Rudolph, D.. The automorphism group of a shift of finite type. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 306(1) (1988), 71–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Buckley, S. M.. Is the maximal function of a Lipschitz function continuous? Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 24(2) (1999), 519–528.Google Scholar
[6]Bunimovich, L. A. and Dettmann, C. P.. Peeping at chaos: nondestructive monitoring of chaotic systems by measuring long-time escape rates. Europhys. Lett. EPL 80(4) (2007), 6, Art. 40001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Bunimovich, L. A. and Yurchenko, A.. Where to place a hole to achieve fastest escape rate. Israel J. Math. to appear.Google Scholar
[8]Collet, P., Martínez, S. and Schmitt, B.. The Pianigiani–Yorke measure for topological Markov chains. Israel J. Math. 97 (1997), 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Demers, M. F. and Young, L.-S.. Escape rates and conditionally invariant measures. Nonlinearity 19(2) (2006), 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hennion, H.. Sur un théorème spectral et son application aux noyaux lipchitziens. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 118(2) (1993), 627–634.Google Scholar
[11]Hensley, D.. Continued fraction Cantor sets, Hausdorff dimension, and functional analysis. J. Number Theory 40(3) (1992), 336–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Hirata, M.. Poisson law for Axiom A diffeomorphisms. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 13(3) (1993), 533–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Ionescu Tulcea, C. T. and Marinescu, G.. Théorie ergodique pour des classes d’opérations non complètement continues. Ann. of Math. (2) 52 (1950), 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Keller, G.. Generalized bounded variation and applications to piecewise monotonic transformations. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete. 69(3) (1985), 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Keller, G. and Liverani, C.. Stability of the spectrum for transfer operators. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 28(1) (1999), 141–152.Google Scholar
[16]Keller, G. and Liverani, C.. Rare events, escape rates and quasistationarity: some exact formulae. J. Stat. Phys. 135(3) (2009), 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Lasota, A. and Yorke, J. A.. On the existence of invariant measures for piecewise monotonic transformations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 186 (1973), 481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Lind, D. A.. Perturbations of shifts of finite type. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 2(3) (1989), 350–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Liverani, C. and Maume-Deschamps, V.. Lasota–Yorke maps with holes: conditionally invariant probability measures and invariant probability measures on the survivor set. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 39(3) (2003), 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Parry, W.. Intrinsic Markov chains. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 112 (1964), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Parry, W. and Pollicott, M.. Zeta functions and the periodic orbit structure of hyperbolic dynamics. Astérisque (187–188) (1990), 1–268.Google Scholar
[22]Pesin, Y. and Weiss, H.. A multifractal analysis of equilibrium measures for conformal expanding maps and Moran-like geometric constructions. J. Stat. Phys. 86(1–2) (1997), 233–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Pesin, Y. B.. Dimension Theory in Dynamical Systems (Chicago Lectures in Mathematics). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Ruelle, D.. Repellers for real analytic maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 2(1) (1982), 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Ruelle, D.. Thermodynamic formalism. Cambridge Mathematical Library, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar
[26]Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 79). Springer, New York, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Zinsmeister, M.. Thermodynamic Formalism and Holomorphic Dynamical Systems (SMF/AMS Texts and Monographs, 2). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000.Google Scholar