Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T13:23:03.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Hilbert dynamical systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

ELI GLASNER  and
BENJAMIN WEISS
ELI GLASNER
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (email: glasner@math.tau.ac.il)
BENJAMIN WEISS
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (email: weiss@math.huji.ac.il)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Returning to a classical question in harmonic analysis, we strengthen an old result of Walter Rudin. We show that there exists a weakly almost periodic function on the group of integers ℤ which is not in the norm-closure of the algebra B(ℤ) of Fourier–Stieltjes transforms of measures on the dual group , and which is recurrent. We also show that there is a Polish monothetic group which is reflexively but not Hilbert representable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 32 , Issue 2: Daniel J. Rudolph – in Memoriam , April 2012 , pp. 629 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Akin, E., Auslander, J. and Berg, K.. When is a transitive map chaotic. Convergence in Ergodic Theory and Probability. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, New York, 1996, pp. 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Banaszczyk, W.. Additive Subgroups of Topological Vector Spaces (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1466). Springer, Berlin, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cornfeld, I. P., Fomin, S. V. and Sinai, Ya. G.. Ergodic Theory. Springer, New York, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Downarowicz, T.. Weakly almost periodic flows and hidden eigenvalues. Topological Dynamics and Applications (Contemporary Mathematics, 215). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998, pp. 101–120, a volume in honor of R. Ellis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Dunkl, C. F. and Ramirez, D. E.. Topics in Harmonic Analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
[6]Ellis, R.. Distal transformation groups. Pacific J. Math. 8 (1957), 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Ellis, R. and Nerurkar, M.. Weakly almost periodic flows. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 313 (1989), 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Ferri, S. and Galindo, J.. Embedding a topological group into its WAP-compactification. Studia Math. 193 (2009), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Galindo, J.. On unitary representability of topological groups. Math. Z. 263 (2009), 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Gao, S. and Pestov, V.. On a universality property of some abelian Polish groups. Fund. Math. 179 (2003), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Glasner, E.. Ergodic Theory via Joinings (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 101). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Glasner, E. and Maon, D.. Rigidity in topological dynamics. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 9 (1989), 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Glasner, E. and Megrelishvili, M.. Linear representations of hereditarily non-sensitive dynamical systems. Colloq. Math. 104(2) (2006), 223–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Nonlinearity 6 (1993), 1067–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Locally equicontinuous dynamical systems. Colloq. Math. 84/85(Part 2) (2000), 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Host, B., Méla, J.-F. and Parreau, F.. Analyse harmonique des mesures. Astérisque 135–136 (1986), 261.Google Scholar
[17]Lemańczyk, M., Parreau, F. and Thouvenot, J.-P.. Gaussian automorphisms whose ergodic self-joinings are Gaussian. Fund. Math. 164 (2000), 253–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Megrelishvili, M.. Reflexively but not unitarily representable topological groups. Topology Proc. 25 (2000), 615–625, (2002).Google Scholar
[19]Megrelishvili, M.. Fragmentability and representations of flows. Topology Proc. 27:2 (2003), 497–544.Google Scholar
[20]Megrelishvili, M.. Reflexively but not Hilbert representable compact flows and semitopological semigroups. Colloq. Math. 110 (2008), 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Megrelishvili, M.. Topological transformation groups: selected topics. Open Problems in Topology II. Ed. Pearl, E.. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007, pp. 421–435.Google Scholar
[22]Pestov, V.. Dynamics of Infinite Dimensional Groups. The Ramsey–Dvoretzky–Milman Phenomenon (University Lecture Series, 40). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006.Google Scholar
[23]Rudin, W.. Weak almost periodic functions and Fourier–Stieltjes transforms. Duke Math. J. 26 (1959), 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Ruppert, W.. Compact Semitopological Semigroups (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1079). Springer, Berlin, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Shtern, A.. Compact semitopological semigroups and reflexive representability. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2 (1994), 131–132.Google Scholar