Hostname: page-component-65f69f4695-w8vvr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-30T06:52:55.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perturbations of multidimensional shifts of finite type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

RONNIE PAVLOV
RONNIE PAVLOV*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 2G3 (email: rpavlov@math.ubc.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we study perturbations of multidimensional shifts of finite type. Specifically, for any ℤd shift of finite type X with d>1 and any finite pattern w in the language of X, we denote by Xw the set of elements of X not containing w. For strongly irreducible X and patterns w with shape a d-dimensional cube, we obtain upper and lower bounds on htop (X)−htop (Xw)dependent on the size of w. This extends a result of Lind for d=1 . We also apply our methods to an undecidability question in ℤd symbolic dynamics.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 483 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Berger, R.. The undecidability of the domino problem. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 66 (1966).Google Scholar
[2]Boyle, M., Pavlov, R. and Schraudner, M.. Multidimensional sofic shifts without separation and their factors. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. to appear.Google Scholar
[3]Burton, R. and Steif, J.. New results on measures of maximal entropy. Israel J. Math. 89(1–3) (1995), 275–300.Google Scholar
[4]Hedlund, G. and Morse, M.. Symbolic dynamics. Amer. J. Math. 60(4) (1938), 815–866.Google Scholar
[5]Hochman, M. and Meyerovitch, T.. A characterization of the entropies of multidimensional shifts of finite type. Ann. of Math. (2) to appear.Google Scholar
[6]Hochman, M.. On the automorphism group of multidimensional SFTs. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. to appear.Google Scholar
[7]Lind, D.. Perturbations of shifts of finite type. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 2(3) (1989), 350–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Lind, D.. Multi-dimensional symbolic dynamics. Symbolic Dynamics and its Applications (Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, 60). Ed. Williams, S.. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004, pp. 81–120.Google Scholar
[9]Lind, D. and Marcus, B.. An Introduction to Symbolic Dynamics and Coding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
[10]Misiurewicz, M.. A short proof of the variational principle for a ℤn+-action on a compact space. Asterisque 40 (1975), 147–157.Google Scholar
[11]Quas, A. and Şahin, A. A.. Entropy gaps and locally maximal entropy in ℤd subshifts. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 1227–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Quas, A. and Trow, P.. Subshifts of multi-dimensional shifts of finite type. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 20(3) (2000), 859–874.Google Scholar
[13]Tempelman, A.. Ergodic theorems for general dynamical systems. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 176 (1967), 790–793 (Russian); Soviet Math. Dokl. 8 (1967), 1213–1216 (English translation).Google Scholar
[14]Wang, H.. Proving theorems by pattern recognition II. AT&T Bell Labs. Tech. J. 40 (1961), 1–41.Google Scholar