Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-24T15:40:21.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resonance between Cantor sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2009

YUVAL PERES  and
PABLO SHMERKIN
YUVAL PERES
Affiliation:
Microsoft Research, Redmond and Departments of Statistics and Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, USA (email: peres@stat.berkeley.edu)
PABLO SHMERKIN
Affiliation:
Departments of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Jyväskylä, Finland (email: shmerkin@maths.jyu.fi)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let Ca be the central Cantor set obtained by removing a central interval of length 1−2a from the unit interval, and then continuing this process inductively on each of the remaining two intervals. We prove that if log b/log a is irrational, then where dimis Hausdorff dimension. More generally, given two self-similar sets K,K′ in ℝ and a scaling parameter s>0, if the dimension of the arithmetic sum K+sK′ is strictly smaller than dim (K)+dim (K′)≤1 (‘geometric resonance’), then there exists r<1 such that all contraction ratios of the similitudes defining K and K′ are powers of r (‘algebraic resonance’). Our method also yields a new result on the projections of planar self-similar sets generated by an iterated function system that includes a scaled irrational rotation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 201 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Cabrelli, C. A., Hare, K. E. and Molter, U. M.. Sums of Cantor sets yielding an interval. J. Aust. Math. Soc. 73(3) (2002), 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Eroǧlu, K. I.. On planar self-similar sets with a dense set of rotations. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 32(2) (2007), 409–424.Google Scholar
[3]Eroǧlu, K. I.. On the arithmetic sums of Cantor sets. Nonlinearity 20 (2007), 1145–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Falconer, K.. Fractal Geometry (Mathematical Foundations and Applications). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1990.Google Scholar
[5]Falconer, K.. Techniques in Fractal Geometry. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1997.Google Scholar
[6]Furstenberg, H.. Intersections of Cantor sets and transversality of semigroups. Problems in Analysis (Symp. Salomon Bochner, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1969). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970, pp. 41–59.Google Scholar
[7]Keane, M., Simon, K. and Solomyak, B.. The dimension of graph directed attractors with overlaps on the line, with an application to a problem in fractal image recognition. Fund. Math. 180(3) (2003), 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Keane, M., Smorodinsky, M. and Solomyak, B.. On the morphology of γ-expansions with deleted digits. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347(3) (1995), 955–966.Google Scholar
[9]Kemeny, J. G. and Snell, J. L.. Finite Markov Chains (The University Series in Undergraduate Mathematics). D. Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ, 1960.Google Scholar
[10]Kenyon, R.. Projecting the one-dimensional Sierpiński gasket. Israel J. Math. 97 (1997), 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Lagarias, J. C. and Wang, Y.. Tiling the line with translates of one tile. Invent. Math. 124(1–3) (1996), 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Mattila, P.. Fractals and rectifiability. Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces (Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 44). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Mendes, P. and Oliveira, F.. On the topological structure of the arithmetic sum of two Cantor sets. Nonlinearity 7(2) (1994), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Moreira, C. G. T. d. A.. Sums of regular Cantor sets, dynamics and applications to number theory. Period. Math. Hungar. 37(1–3) (1998), 55–63. (International Conference on Dimension and Dynamics, Miskolc, 1998.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Moreira, C. G. T. d. A. and Yoccoz, J.-C.. Stable intersections of regular Cantor sets with large Hausdorff dimensions. Ann. of Math. (2) 154(1) (2001), 45–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Palis, J.. Homoclinic orbits, hyperbolic dynamics and dimension of Cantor sets. The Lefschetz Centennial Conference, Part III (Mexico City, 1984) (Contemporary Mathematics, 58). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1987, pp. 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Peres, Y. and Schlag, W.. Smoothness of projections, Bernoulli convolutions, and the dimension of exceptions. Duke Math. J. 102(2) (2000), 193–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Peres, Y., Schlag, W. and Solomyak, B.. Sixty years of Bernoulli convolutions. Fractal Geometry and Stochastics, II (Greifswald/Koserow, 1998) (Progress in Probability, 46). Birkhäuser, Basel, 2000,pp. 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Peres, Y. and Solomyak, B.. Self-similar measures and intersections of Cantor sets. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 350(10) (1998), 4065–4087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Pollicott, M. and Simon, K.. The Hausdorff dimension of λ-expansions with deleted digits. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347(3) (1995), 967–983.Google Scholar
[21]Rams, M.. Generic behavior of iterated function systems with overlaps. Pacific J. Math. 218(1) (2005), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Shmerkin, P.. Moreira’s theorem on the arithmetic sum of dynamically defined Cantor sets. Unpulished. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3709, 2008.Google Scholar
[23]Solomyak, B.. On the measure of arithmetic sums of Cantor sets. Indag. Math. (N.S.) 8(1) (1997), 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Spitzer, F.. Principles of Random Walk, 2nd edn(Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 34). Springer, New York, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar