Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:17:32.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Efficacy of Atomoxetine, Lisdexamfetamine, Bupropion and Methylphenidate in Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: a Metaanalysis with Focus On Bupropion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

M. Stuhec
Affiliation:
Clinical Pharmacy, ORMOZ'S PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, Ormoz, Slovenia
B. Munda
Affiliation:
Chair of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
V. Svab
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine University Ljubljana Vrazov trg 2 1104 Ljubljana Slovenia European Union., Ljubljana, Slovenia
I. Locatelli
Affiliation:
Chair of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Pharmacotherapy is essential for the treatment of children and adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). There are only two metaanalyzes available in the literature where bupropion (BUP) was also included and compared to atomoxetine (ATX) and methylphenidate (MPH) in the treatment of ADHD in youths.

Objectives

There is a lack of comparative effectiveness research among ADHD medications in terms of efficacy, where BUP is compared with ATX, lisdexamfetamine (LDX) and MPH.

Aim

The main aim of this work was to compare the efficacy of these drugs in children and adolescents using a metaanalysis.

Methods

A literature search was conducted to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled, noncrossover studies of ADHD. A systematic electronic literature search of PubMed (1975–April 2014) and clinicaltrials.gov with full text (1981–April 2014) was conducted. Drug efficacy was calculated based on the standardized mean difference (SMD). Treatment score was the primary endpoint.

Results

28 articles and 27 trials met inclusion criteria and were sufficient for inclusion in the metaanalysis. BUP 0.32 (95% CI, -0.05, 0.69) showed small efficacy, ATX 0.68 (95% CI, 0.59, 0.76), and MPH 0.75 (95% CI, 0.52, 0.98) showed modest efficacy in reducing ADHD symptoms and LDX showed high efficacy 1.28 (95% CL, 0.71, 1.84).

Conclusions

The results suggest that LDX has the best efficacy and has promising potential for treating children and adolescents with ADHD. Effect sizes should not be the only evidence for clinicians when choosing ADHD medication. More research is needed for a better clinical evaluation of BUP.

Type
Article: 0421
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.