Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-trf7k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-16T08:17:12.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy of Topiramate in Treating Methamphetamine Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

M. L. Geremias
Affiliation:
Medicine, University of Joinville Region (UNIVILLE), Joinville
I. Borja De Oliveira
Affiliation:
Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo
A. L. Balduino de Souza
Affiliation:
Medicine, Evangelical University of Goias, Anapolis
F. Bandeira de Melo Guimarães
Affiliation:
Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
D. Soler Lopes*
Affiliation:
Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Methamphetamine use disorder poses a significant public health challenge, with few effective pharmacological treatments. Topiramate, an anticonvulsant, shows potential for treating various substance use disorders. This meta-analysis evaluates topiramate’s efficacy in treating methamphetamine use disorder, focusing on abstinence rates and depressive symptoms.

Objectives

This review aims to assess the efficacy of topiramate in treating methamphetamine use disorder, specifically its impact on abstinence rates measured by negative urine tests for methamphetamine. Additionally, it evaluates topiramate’s effects on depressive symptoms, quantified by Beck Depression Inventory scores.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO in September 2024, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included studies were peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing topiramate’s effects on individuals with methamphetamine use disorder. The analysis utilized a random-effects model, with the primary outcome being abstinence assessed through negative urine tests and the secondary outcome being depression scores from the Beck Depression Inventory.

Results

Three studies (n = 249) were included, comparing topiramate to placebo. The pooled risk ratio (RR) for the common effect model was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.94-1.07), indicating no significant difference between topiramate and placebo. Heterogeneity was low (I² = 2%, p = 0.36). Individual study risk ratios ranged from 0.43 to 1.09, with the largest study (n = 140) showing no effect (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.93-1.07). Two studies (n = 109) reported that topiramate tended to improve depressive symptoms relative to placebo, though not reaching statistical significance (mean difference = -2.52 (95% CI: -5.31 to 0.26).

Conclusions

For patients with methamphetamine use disorder, topiramate did not increase abstinence rates when compared to placebo, but showed a trend towards improving depressive symptoms. Although no statistically significant effects were observed, the trends provide a foundation for future research. Larger sample sizes, extended follow-up periods, and standardized outcome measures are needed to better evaluate topiramate’s efficacy. Future studies should also explore dose-response relationships, combination therapies, and identify patient subgroups likely to benefit from topiramate, which may reveal clinically meaningful effects and enhance treatment options for methamphetamine use disorder.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.