Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:20:42.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-448 - the Validation of Adas-cog: Cognitive Performance and Characteristics of Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease or Depressive Pseudodementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

G. Drótos
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
M. Pákáski
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
E. Papp
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
J. Kálmán
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

The cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog) has been established internationally as an instrument for the assessment of treatment efficacy and cognitive performance in clinical trials. there is no data about the psychometric characteristics of ADAS-Cog in Hungarian sample.

Objectives:

This study is a part of the Hungarian standardization process of ADAS-Cog. It is crucial to examine the cognitive performance of patients with pseudodementia caused by depression (D) because of its’ similarities with Alzheimer's disease (AD). the objective of the study was to analyze the characteristics of the cognitive subscale for further validation purposes.

Aims:

The study aimed at analyzing the ADAS-Cog performance of patients with D and AD in a Hungarian sample to make future studies more accurate through more exact differentiation between the two diseases.

Methods:

Forty-seven normal elderly control (CG) subjects, 66 AD patients and 39 patients with D participated in the study. the mental state and the severity of depressive symptoms of the participants were assessed by the means of ADAS-Cog, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Beck Depression Inventory.

Results:

While the performance of the two patient groups differed from the CG, the two groups are overlapping and the characteristic of the ROC curve indicates that the differentiation is mediocre (AUC = 0.8 Sensitivity = 62.1%, Specificity = 89.7%).

Conclusions:

The results suggest that pseudodementia should be considered during the design of studies using ADAS-Cog. as the cognitive subscale is not suitable to differentiate between AD and pseudodementia additional measures like BDI should be administered.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.