Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Explaining the timing of tulipmania's boom and bust: historical context, sequestered capital and market signals

  • James E. McClure (a1) and David Chandler Thomas (a1)
Abstract

Framing tulipmania in terms of sequestered capital – capital whose quantities, usages and future yields are hidden from market participants – offers a richer and more straightforward explanation for this famous financial bubble than extant alternatives. Simply put, the underground planting of the tulip bulbs in 1636 blindfolded seventeenth-century Dutch speculators regarding the planted quantities and their development and future yields. The price boom began in mid November 1636, coinciding with the time of planting. The price collapse occurred in the first week of February 1637, coinciding with the time of bulb sprouting – signaling bulb quantities, development and future yields. Also consistent with our explanation is the initial price collapse location, in the Dutch city of Haarlem, where temperature and geography favored early sprouting and sprout visibility.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Explaining the timing of tulipmania's boom and bust: historical context, sequestered capital and market signals
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Explaining the timing of tulipmania's boom and bust: historical context, sequestered capital and market signals
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Explaining the timing of tulipmania's boom and bust: historical context, sequestered capital and market signals
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
D. C. Thomas (corresponding author), Miller College of Business, Department of Economics, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana 47306, USA; email: dcthomas@bsu.edu.
Footnotes
Hide All

Thanks to Cecil Bohanon, Philip Coelho, Mike Dash, Douglas French, John Horowitz, Erik Nesson and Lee Spector, and to two anonymous referees for important insight and guidance.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Bohm-BawerkE. Von ([1884] 1959). Capital and Interest. South Holland: Libertarian Press.
DashM. (1999). Tulipomania. New York: Three Rivers Press.
FrenchD. (2006). The Dutch monetary environment during tulipmania. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 9 (1), pp. 314.
FriedmanM. (1966). The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
GarberP. (1989). Tulipmania. Journal of Political Economy, 97 (3), 535–60.
GarberP. (2001). Famous First Bubbles. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
GarrisonR. W. (2001). Time and Money. London: Routledge.
GarrisonR. W. (2004). Overconsumption and forced saving in the Mises-Hayek theory of the business cycle. History of Political Economy, 36 (2), 323–49.
GoldgarA. (2002). Nature as Art: The Case of the Tulip. http://uba.uva.nl/home University of Amsterdam http://cf.uba.uva.nl/goudeneeuw/archief/2002/colloquium-4april2002.rtf
GoldgarA. (2007). Tulipmania: Money, Honor and Knowledge in the Dutch Golden Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MackayC. ([1841] 2016). Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. Lexington, KY: Richard Bentley.
MatherJ. C. (1961). Commercial Production of Tulips and Daffodils. London: Balding & Mansell.
MisesL. Von ([1912] 1953). The Theory of Money and Credit. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McClureJ. E. and ThomasD. C. (2016). Can sticky consumption cause business cycles? Review of Austrian Economics. Published online ahead of print 12 November.
McClureJ. E. and ThomasD. C. (2017). Austrian business cycle theory: reconciling Hayek, Mises, and Schumpeter. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2909141
PosthumusN. W. (1928–9). The tulip mania in Holland in the years 1636 and 1637. Journal of Economic and Business History, 1, pp. 434–66.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1926; 1934 translation). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
ThomasR. P. (1969). The automobile industry and its tycoon. Explorations in Entrepreneurial History, 6 (2), pp. 139–57.
ThompsonE. A. (2006). The tulipmania: fact or artifact? Public Choice, 130, pp. 99114.
WicksellK. ([1898] 1962). Interest and Prices. New York: Kelley.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Financial History Review
  • ISSN: 0968-5650
  • EISSN: 1474-0052
  • URL: /core/journals/financial-history-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 26
Total number of PDF views: 175 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 243 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 11th September 2017 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.