Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Novel market inefficiencies from early Victorian times

  • Andrew Odlyzko (a1)

A previously unknown pricing anomaly existed for a few years in the late 1840s in the British government bond market, in which the larger and more liquid of two very large bonds was underpriced. None of the published mechanisms explains this phenomenon. It may be related to another pricing anomaly that existed for much of the nineteenth century in which terminable annuities were significantly underpriced relative to so-called ‘perpetual’ annuities that dominated the government bond market. The reasons for these mispricings seem to lie in the early Victorian culture, since the basic economic incentives as well as laws and institutions were essentially the familiar modern ones. This provides new perspectives on the origins and nature of modern corporate capitalism.

Corresponding author
A. Odlyzko, School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, mn 55455, USA, email:
Hide All

Comments from the anonymous referees and the editor are gratefully acknowledged. The Bank of England Archive graciously allowed the publication of the data presented here. The many other individuals and institutions that assisted in the larger research project of which this is a part are thanked at

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Alquist (2010). How important is liquidity risk for sovereign bond risk premia? Evidence from the London Stock Exchange. Journal of International Economics, 82, pp. 219–29.

Y. Amihud , H. Mendelson and L. H. Pedersen (2005). Liquidity and asset prices. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 1, pp. 269364.

R. L. Brown and S. A. Easton (1989). Weak-form efficiency in the nineteenth century: a study of daily prices in the London market for 3 percent consols, 1821–1860. Economica, 56, pp. 6170.

W. O. Brown , R. C. K. Burdekin and M. D. Weidenmier (2006). Volatility in an era of reduced uncertainty: lessons from Pax Britannica. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, pp. 693707.

P. Carayannopoulos (1995). The mispricing of US Treasury callable bonds. Journal of Futures Markets, 15, pp. 861–79. Erratum in same journal (1997), 17, p. 129.

P. Carayannopoulos (1998). The mispricing of US Treasury callable bonds: a note. Journal of Futures Markets, 18, pp. 329–42.

W. Cunningham (1892). The perversion of economic history. Economic Journal, 2, pp. 491506.

M. Fleckenstein , F. A. Longstaff and H. Lustig (2014). Why does Treasury issue TIPS? The TIPS–Treasury bond puzzle. Journal of Finance, 69, pp. 2151–97.

C. C. Geczy and M. Samonov (2016). Two centuries of price-return momentum. Financial Analysts Journal, 72, pp. 3256.

C. E. Heim and P. Mirowski (1987). Interest rates and crowding-out during Britain's industrial revolution. Journal of Economic History, 47, pp. 117–39.

B. D. Jordan and D. R. Kuipers (1997). Negative option values are possible: the impact of Treasury bond futures on the cash US Treasury market. Journal of Financial Economics, 46, pp. 67102.

J. T. Klovland (1994). Pitfalls in the estimation of the yield on British Consols, 1850–1914. Journal of Economic History, 54, pp. 164–87.

F. A. Longstaff (1992). Are negative option prices possible? The callable US Treasury-bond puzzle. Journal of Business, 65, pp. 571–92.

A. Ljungqvist and W. Qian (2016). How constraining are limits to arbitrage? Review of Financial Studies, 29, pp. 19752028.

A. M. Odlyzko (2016b). Economically irrational pricing of nineteenth-century British government bonds. Financial History Review, 23, pp. 277302.

J. Rutterford (2004). From dividend yield to discounted cash flow: a history of UK and US equity valuation techniques. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 14, pp. 115–49.

J. J. Siegel (1992). The real rate of interest from 1800–1990: a study of the US and the UK. Journal of Monetary Economics, 29, pp. 227–52.

D. Vayanos and P. Weill (2008). A search-based theory of the on-the-run phenomenon. Journal of Finance, 63, pp. 1361–99.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Financial History Review
  • ISSN: 0968-5650
  • EISSN: 1474-0052
  • URL: /core/journals/financial-history-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 9 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 54 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 13th June 2017 - 18th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.