 $\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{g,n}$
$\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{g,n}$Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2021
We study smoothing of pencils of curves on surfaces with normal crossings. As a consequence we show that the canonical divisor of  $\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{g,n}$ is not pseudoeffective in some range, implying that
$\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{g,n}$ is not pseudoeffective in some range, implying that  $\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{12,6}$,
$\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{12,6}$,  $\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{12,7}$,
$\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{12,7}$,  $\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{13,4}$ and
$\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{13,4}$ and  $\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{14,3}$ are uniruled. We provide upper bounds for the Kodaira dimension of
$\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{14,3}$ are uniruled. We provide upper bounds for the Kodaira dimension of  $\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{12,8}$ and
$\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{12,8}$ and  $\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{16}$. We also show that the moduli space of
$\overline {\mathcal {M}}_{16}$. We also show that the moduli space of  $(4g+5)$-pointed hyperelliptic curves
$(4g+5)$-pointed hyperelliptic curves  $\overline {\mathcal {H}}_{g,4g+5}$ is uniruled. Together with a recent result of Schwarz, this concludes the classification of moduli of pointed hyperelliptic curves with negative Kodaira dimension.
$\overline {\mathcal {H}}_{g,4g+5}$ is uniruled. Together with a recent result of Schwarz, this concludes the classification of moduli of pointed hyperelliptic curves with negative Kodaira dimension.
 ${{\mathcal{M}}}_{15}$ is rationally connected’, in Projective Varieties with Unexpected Properties, (Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin, 2005), 51–65.Google Scholar
${{\mathcal{M}}}_{15}$ is rationally connected’, in Projective Varieties with Unexpected Properties, (Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin, 2005), 51–65.Google Scholar $11,13$ (and
$11,13$ (and  $12$)’, Invent. Math. 76 (1984), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$12$)’, Invent. Math. 76 (1984), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $15$’, J. Differential Geom. 24 (1986), 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$15$’, J. Differential Geom. 24 (1986), 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar ${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_g$for small
${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_g$for small  $g$’, J. Differential Geom. 34 (1991), 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$g$’, J. Differential Geom. 34 (1991), 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $\ge 23$’, Invent. Math. 90 (1987), 359–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$\ge 23$’, Invent. Math. 90 (1987), 359–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar ${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_{22}$ and
${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_{22}$ and  ${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_{23}$’, Preprint, 2020, arXiv: 2005.00622.Google Scholar
${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_{23}$’, Preprint, 2020, arXiv: 2005.00622.Google Scholar ${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_g$, curves on
${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_g$, curves on  $K3$ surfaces and the Slope Conjecture’, J. Algebraic Geom. 14 (2005), 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$K3$ surfaces and the Slope Conjecture’, J. Algebraic Geom. 14 (2005), 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar ${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_{16}$’, Preprint, 2020, arXiv: 2008.08852.Google Scholar
${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_{16}$’, Preprint, 2020, arXiv: 2008.08852.Google Scholar ${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_g$’, Invent. Math. 67 (1982), 23–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
${\overline{{\mathcal{M}}}}_g$’, Invent. Math. 67 (1982), 23–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $15$ and
$15$ and  $16$ curves. Preprint, 2019, arXiv: 1905.00449.Google Scholar
$16$ curves. Preprint, 2019, arXiv: 1905.00449.Google Scholar $14$ and lower’, Compos. Math. 141 (2005), 1425–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$14$ and lower’, Compos. Math. 141 (2005), 1425–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar