Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:13:26.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

UPPER BOUNDS FOR SUNFLOWER-FREE SETS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2017

ERIC NASLUND
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Princeton University, Fine Hall, Washington Road, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; naslund@princeton.edu
WILL SAWIN
Affiliation:
ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; william.sawin@math.ethz.ch

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A collection of $k$ sets is said to form a $k$-sunflower, or $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}$-system, if the intersection of any two sets from the collection is the same, and we call a family of sets ${\mathcal{F}}$sunflower-free if it contains no $3$-sunflowers. Following the recent breakthrough of Ellenberg and Gijswijt (‘On large subsets of $\mathbb{F}_{q}^{n}$ with no three-term arithmetic progression’, Ann. of Math. (2) 185 (2017), 339–343); (‘Progression-free sets in $\mathbb{Z}_{4}^{n}$ are exponentially small’, Ann. of Math. (2) 185 (2017), 331–337) we apply the polynomial method directly to Erdős–Szemerédi sunflower problem (Erdős and Szemerédi, ‘Combinatorial properties of systems of sets’, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 24 (1978), 308–313) and prove that any sunflower-free family ${\mathcal{F}}$ of subsets of $\{1,2,\ldots ,n\}$ has size at most

$$\begin{eqnarray}|{\mathcal{F}}|\leqslant 3n\mathop{\sum }_{k\leqslant n/3}\binom{n}{k}\leqslant \left(\frac{3}{2^{2/3}}\right)^{n(1+o(1))}.\end{eqnarray}$$
We say that a set $A\subset (\mathbb{Z}/D\mathbb{Z})^{n}=\{1,2,\ldots ,D\}^{n}$ for $D>2$ is sunflower-free if for every distinct triple $x,y,z\in A$ there exists a coordinate $i$ where exactly two of $x_{i},y_{i},z_{i}$ are equal. Using a version of the polynomial method with characters $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}:\mathbb{Z}/D\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ instead of polynomials, we show that any sunflower-free set $A\subset (\mathbb{Z}/D\mathbb{Z})^{n}$ has size
$$\begin{eqnarray}|A|\leqslant c_{D}^{n}\end{eqnarray}$$
where $c_{D}=\frac{3}{2^{2/3}}(D-1)^{2/3}$. This can be seen as making further progress on a possible approach to proving the Erdős and Rado sunflower conjecture (‘Intersection theorems for systems of sets’,J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 35 (1960), 85–90), which by the work of Alon et al. (‘On sunflowers and matrix multiplication’, Comput. Complexity22 (2013), 219–243; Theorem 2.6) is equivalent to proving that $c_{D}\leqslant C$ for some constant $C$ independent of $D$.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2017

References

Alon, N., Shpilka, A. and Umans, C., ‘On sunflowers and matrix multiplication’, Comput. Complexity 22 (2013), 219243.Google Scholar
Blasiak, J., Church, T., Cohn, H., Grochow, J., Naslund, E., Sawin, W. F. and Umans, C., ‘On cap sets and the group-theoretic approach to matrix multiplication’, Discrete Anal. 3 (2017).Google Scholar
Croot, E., Lev, V. and Pach, P., ‘Progression-free sets in ℤ4 n are exponentially small’, Ann. of Math. (2) 185 (2017), 331337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellenberg, J. S. and Gijswijt, D., ‘On large subsets of F q n with no three-term arithmetic progression’, Ann. of Math. (2) 185 (2017), 339343.Google Scholar
Erdős, P. and Rado, R., ‘Intersection theorems for systems of sets’, J. Lond. Math. Soc.(2) 35 (1960), 8590.Google Scholar
Erdős, P. and Szemerédi, E., ‘Combinatorial properties of systems of sets’, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 24 (1978), 308313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haemers, W., ‘An upper bound for the Shannon capacity of a graph’, in Algebraic Methods in Graph Theory, Vols. I, II (Szeged, 1978), Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai, 25, 267–272.Google Scholar
Tao, T., ‘A symmetric formulation of the Croot–Lev–Pach–Ellenberg–Gijswijt capset bound, blog post’, 2016, http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/05/18/a.Google Scholar