Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bkrcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-23T05:55:34.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CLASSIFYING CLOSED 2-ORBIFOLDS WITH EULER CHARACTERISTICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2010

WHITNEY DUVAL ,
JOHN SCHULTE ,
CHRISTOPHER SEATON  and
BRADFORD TAYLOR
WHITNEY DUVAL
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Rhodes College, 2000 N. Parkway, Memphis, TN 38112, USA e-mails: whitney.duval@gmail.com, johnschulte1987@gmail.com, bradfordptaylor@gmail.com; seatonc@rhodes.edu
JOHN SCHULTE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Rhodes College, 2000 N. Parkway, Memphis, TN 38112, USA e-mails: whitney.duval@gmail.com, johnschulte1987@gmail.com, bradfordptaylor@gmail.com; seatonc@rhodes.edu
CHRISTOPHER SEATON
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Rhodes College, 2000 N. Parkway, Memphis, TN 38112, USA e-mails: whitney.duval@gmail.com, johnschulte1987@gmail.com, bradfordptaylor@gmail.com; seatonc@rhodes.edu
BRADFORD TAYLOR
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Rhodes College, 2000 N. Parkway, Memphis, TN 38112, USA e-mails: whitney.duval@gmail.com, johnschulte1987@gmail.com, bradfordptaylor@gmail.com; seatonc@rhodes.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We determine the extent to which the collection of Γ-Euler–Satake characteristics classify closed 2-orbifolds. In particular, we show that the closed, connected, effective, orientable 2-orbifolds are classified by the Γ-Euler–Satake characteristics corresponding to free or free abelian Γ and are not classified by those corresponding to any finite set of finitely generated discrete groups. These results demonstrate that the Γ-Euler–Satake characteristics corresponding to free abelian Γ constitute new invariants of orbifolds. Similarly, we show that such a classification is neither possible for non-orientable 2-orbifolds nor for non-effective 2-orbifolds using any collection of groups Γ.

Keywords

Primary 57R2057S17Secondary 22A2257P99

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 555 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2010

References

REFERENCES

1.Adem, A., Leida, J. and Ruan, Y., Orbifolds and stringy topology, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 171 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Boileau, M., Maillot, S. and Porti, J., Three-Dimensional Orbifolds and their Geometric Structures, Panoramas et Synthéses, 15 (Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 2003).Google Scholar
3.Bryan, J. and Fulman, J., Orbifold Euler characteristics and the number of commuting m-tuples in the symmetric groups, Ann. Comb. 2 (1) (1998), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Chen, W. and Ruan, Y., Orbifold Gromov-Witten theory, in Orbifolds in mathematics and physics (Madison, WI, 2001), Contemp. Math., 310, Amer. Math. Soc. (Providence, RI, 2002), 25–85.Google Scholar
5.Chen, W. and Ruan, Y., A new cohomology theory of orbifold, Commun. Math. Phys. 248 (1) (2004), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Dixon, L., Harvey, J., Vafa, C. and Witten, E., Strings on orbifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 261 (4) (1985), 678–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Farsi, C. and Seaton, C., Generalized twisted sectors of orbifolds, Pacific J. Math. 246 (1) (2010), 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Farsi, C. and Seaton, C., Generalized orbifold Euler characteristics for general orbifolds and wreath products, arXiv:0902.1198v1 [math.DG] (2009).Google Scholar
9.Farsi, C. and Seaton, C., Nonvanishing vector fields on orbifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (1) (2010), 509–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kawasaki, T., The signature theorem for V-manifolds, Topology 17 (1) (1978), 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Massey, W. S., Algebraic topology: An introduction, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 56 (Springer, Berlin, 1984).Google Scholar
12.Moerdijk, I. and Mrčun, J., Introduction to Foliations and Lie Groupoids, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 91 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Moerdijk, I. and Pronk, D., Simplicial cohomology of orbifolds, Indag. Math. (N.S.) 10 (2) (1999), 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Roan, S. S., Minimal resolutions of Gorenstein orbifolds in dimension three, Topology 35 (2) (1996), 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Satake, I., The Gauss–Bonnet theorem for V-manifolds, J. Math. Soc. Japan 9 (1957), 464–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Tamanoi, H., Generalized orbifold Euler characteristic of symmetric products and equivariant Morava K-theory, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 1 (2001), 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Tamanoi, H., Generalized orbifold Euler characteristic of symmetric orbifolds and covering spaces, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 3 (2003), 791–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Thurston, W., The Geometry and Topology of 3-Manifolds, Lecture Notes (Princeton University Mathematics Deptment, Princeton, NJ, 1978).Google Scholar