| Article Type | Limits | Details | |
| Long form Research Papers | Papers should be as concise as clarity permits and in general we would expect articles not to exceed 7,000 words not counting title, abstract, text boxes, figures, tables and references. | This category is intended for full-scale research studies that fit within the journal’s scope. | |
| Research Report | This category is designed for concisely written research reports (1500 words) for which rapid publication is considered desirable. | Research report will follow a streamlined schedule and will normally be published within three months of submission. To meet this schedule, authors will be required to make revisions with minimal delay. | |
| Review Papers | The length of the Review article will depend on the scope of the subject area and its topicality, but generally articles should not exceed 8000 words for the main text, and 150 references. | Reviews provide a comprehensive assessment of a particular topic or research area. They may provide interdisciplinary syntheses and can provide strong conclusions relevant to future research, policy or other societal implications. These articles should provide a comprehensive assessment of a particular topic or research area of broad interest. | |
| Intelligence Briefings | These can be short reflections or longer perspective pieces. They should not surpass the limit of 3000 words in the text, not counting title, abstract, text boxes, figures, tables and references. | Intelligence Briefings situate new findings within authoritative, agenda-setting, lively articles addressing topical issues of global significance aimed at a policy audience. We invite papers that address academic debate concerning controversial issues. This should be a common space that fosters debate. They will highlight societal implications and encourage social transformations. For all types of Intelligence briefings we encourage authors to contact the journal’s editorial office at gsus@cambridge.org to discuss a potential submission. Global Sustainability welcomes post- publication debate on these pieces in the form of commentaries and/or Intelligence Briefings that provide a different perspective on the issue reflected upon in the original Intelligence Briefing. See more detail on the submission process and formatting of these in the section below. | |
| Commentaries | Commentaries are flexible in format but should generally be limited to 1500 words, without figures. | Commentaries are opinion papers related to topical issues in sustainability. They can be written in response to other articles published by the journal (readers are encouraged to submit these as soon as possible), or they can be viewpoints on important sustainability matters and related discussions. Commentaries will be subject to review by Global Sustainability editorial team. | |
| Concepts and Perspectives | These can be up to 5,000 words in length | Concepts and perspectives are intendent to be either or more forward looking, speculative, and/or opinionated than regular research reports. But in contrast to Commentaries, they provide more substance and are more firmly embedded in relevant research frontiers. Although being thought-provoking and stimulating new debates are core concepts for this category, being balanced, fair and sensible in subject and style is nonetheless a requirement. Articles in this category will normally undergo full peer review, but on occasion will be peer reviewed by the editorial team. | |
| Editorial | They should be limited to 2 pages. | Editorials are usually written by the editorial team, or by Guest Editors to introduce a special collection. | |
Policy on prior publication
When authors submit manuscripts to this journal, these manuscripts should not be under consideration, accepted for publication or in press within a different journal, book or similar entity, unless explicit permission or agreement has been sought from all entities involved. However, deposition of a preprint on the author’s personal website, in an institutional repository, or in a preprint archive shall not be viewed as prior or duplicate publication. Authors should follow the Cambridge University Press Preprint Policy regarding preprint archives and maintaining the version of record.
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools
We acknowledge the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in research and writing processes. In this section we explain how to declare the use of AI tools in an accountable and transparent way, in accordance with the Cambridge University Press Research Publishing Ethics Guidelines.
Authorship
We do not consider artificial intelligence (AI) tools to meet the accountability requirements of authorship, and therefore generative AI tools such as ChatGPT should not be listed as authors on any submitted content.
Credit and citation
All use of AI-generated content must comply with our plagiarism policy and best practices regarding citation and acknowledgement.
You must not present ideas, words, data, or other material originally produced by third parties without appropriate acknowledgement or permission.
Transparency: declaration and description
We outline below the forms of AI use that must be declared and described to readers, as well as where and how to do this within your manuscript.
What to declare
You should always declare and describe your use of an AI tool if you have used it to generate text or images (this includes the translation of sources or of your own work) or to analyse or extract insights from data or other materials.
Minimal and non-generative uses of AI tools in manuscript preparation do not require declaration. For instance, basic spelling or language checking, incorporation of single words or brief phrases, or minor formatting tasks such as converting section headers to bold type. It is important to note that accountability for the use of AI tools, including minimal and non-generative ones, rests with the author. Caution should be used in all cases and it is important to check your article thoroughly for unintended consequences, particularly in relation to the references.
If you are unsure about whether a particular use of an AI tool requires declaration, please contact the journal’s editorial office.
Where to declare
Use of AI tools should be declared in your manuscript in the same way that you would declare your use of other tools and assistance.
- If you have used AI tools to generate text within your manuscript, this should be declared in the same way you would declare your use of other language-editing services, for example in a separate acknowledgments section or in a footnote.
- If you have used AI tools to collect or analyse data, the way you have done this should be described in your methods section or general description of your methodology, in the same way you would describe your use of other software or analysis processes.
- If you have used AI tools to generate visual content that appears in your manuscript, this should be declared in the captions of any figures that you have generated or modified using AI tools.
This ensures your declarations appear where readers, editors, and reviewers naturally expect to find information about tools and processes used in your work.
How to declare
Descriptions of your use of AI tools should include:
- the name and version of the tool you used
- the date(s) you used the tool for the purpose(s) described, to the extent reasonably possible
- how the tool can be accessed or used by others, to the extent reasonably possible
- a full description of how you used the tool
- appropriate citations to any third-party text, datasets or other material used or included in the tool’s output.
Additionally, as appropriate, descriptions should include:
- any proprietary information relevant to the use of the tool
- any ways in which you modified the version of the tool that you used (such as training it on your own data)
- any competing interests or potential bias that should be considered as a consequence of the tool’s use, including as a result of its ownership or development.