We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 June 2020
This article presents a reinterpretation of John Locke's contribution to debates about the interest rate in the seventeenth century. It suggests that his argument that England should maintain the ‘natural’ rate, rather than impose a lower rate, was motivated by his theological, moral, and social conceptions of credit and its dependence on trust. In order to solve the endemic shortage of metal coin limiting the growth of monetary exchange in England, Locke stressed that the higher, ‘natural’ rate of interest would facilitate interpersonal borrowing and lending among neighbours, allowing currency to flow more freely around the country. By contrast, while he acknowledged that institutional creditors such as goldsmith-bankers could quicken the circulation of money by issuing debt instruments like bills of exchange, he saw institutional credit as a threat to the moral community. Not only did he question how people could rationally trust financiers without any epistemic apprehension of their personal probity, but he moreover doubted whether individuals accumulating so much money were likely to act trustworthily. Finally, using an otherwise unstudied dialogue about the Bank of England, this article argues Locke extended his criticisms about the threats posted by private banks to the country's nascent system of public credit.
This article originated as an undergraduate dissertation at Cambridge. I would like to thank Craig Muldrew for supervising it, John Dunn for providing invaluable feedback, and my director of studies Paul Cavill for his support along the way. Thanks also to the Bodleian Library for kindly allowing me access to its collections, and for the anonymous referees’ helpful comments.
1 Locke, John, Further considerations concerning raising the value of money, in Kelly, Patrick Hyde, ed., Locke on money (2 vols., Oxford, 1991), ii, pp. 399–481, at p. 419Google Scholar.
2 Ferguson, Niall, The ascent of money: a financial history of the world (New York, NY, 2012), p. 2Google Scholar.
3 Davenant, Charles, Discourses on the publick revenues, and on the trade of England (London, 1698), p. 38Google Scholar.
4 See Muldrew, Craig, The economy of obligation: the culture of credit and social relations in early modern England (New York, NY, 1998), p. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also see Waddell, Brodie, God, duty and community in English economic life, 1660–1720 (Woodbridge, 2012)Google Scholar; and Wrightson, Keith, ‘Mutualities and obligations: changing social relationships in early modern England’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 139 (2006), pp. 157–94Google Scholar. Christopher Briggs has traced interpersonal credit back to the thirteenth century in ‘Manor court procedures, debt litigation levels, and rural credit provision in England, c. 1290 – c. 1380’, Law and History Review, 24 (2006), pp. 519–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Anon., Angliae tutamen: or, the safety of England (London, 1695), p. 6Google Scholar.
6 Letwin, William, The origins of scientific economics: English economic thought, 1660–1776 (London, 1963), pp. 147–8Google Scholar. For a fuller summary of approaches to seventeenth-century economic thought, see Weiser, Brian, ‘Recent work in seventeenth-century economic thought’, Historical Compass, 4 (2006), pp. 142–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Appleby, Joyce, ‘Locke, liberalism and the natural law of money’, Past & Present, 71 (1976), pp. 43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also see eadem, Economic thought and ideology in seventeenth-century England (Princeton, NJ, 1978)Google Scholar. For a demonstration of the lineage of these ideas, see Chalk, A. F., ‘Natural law and the rise of economic individualism in England’, Journal of Political Economy, 59 (1951), pp. 332–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Macpherson, C. B., The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke (Oxford, 1962), pp. 194–257Google Scholar.
8 See, for instance, Rothschild, Emma, Economic sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment (Cambridge, MA, 2002)Google Scholar; and Hont, Istvan, ed., Jealousy of trade: international competition and the nation-state in historical perspective (Cambridge, MA, 2005)Google Scholar.
9 This article draws upon the integrated wholes outlined in Dunn, John, The political thought of John Locke (Cambridge, 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Harris, Ian, The mind of John Locke (Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar, as the more the specific contexts outlined in Marshall, John, Resistance, religion and responsibility (Cambridge, 1994)Google Scholar. Dunn's emphasis on the importance of trust in Locke's thought particularly informs the argument of this article.
10 Cranston, Maurice, Locke: a biography (London, 1957), p. 17Google Scholar.
11 Ibid., p. 4.
12 Wrightson, Keith, Earthly necessities: economic lives in early modern Britain, 1470–1750 (London, 2002), pp. 108–9, 175Google Scholar; also see Clay, C. G. A., Economic expansion and social change: England, 1500–1700 (2 vols., Cambridge, 1984)Google Scholar; and Overton, Mark et al. , Production and consumption in English households, 1600–1750 (London, 2004)Google Scholar.
13 Milton, J. R., ‘Locke at Oxford’, in Rogers, G. A. J., ed., Locke's philosophy: content and context (Oxford, 1994), pp. 29–47, at p. 45Google Scholar. Locke specifically praised Mun's criticism of Gerard de Malynes, who ‘disguised his own advantage with sophistry to further some private end by hurting the public good’, as it appears in Mun, Thomas, England's treasure by forraign trade (London, 1664), p. 109Google Scholar, in Locke Manuscripts, Bodleian Library, Oxford (MS Locke) f. 14, p. 173, repeated in MS Locke d. 10, fo. 103.
14 Finkelstein, Andrea, Harmony and the balance: an intellectual history of seventeenth-century economic thought (Ann Arbor, MI, 2000), pp. 15–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wennerlind, Carl, Casualties of credit: the English financial revolution, 1620–1720 (Cambridge, MA, 2011), pp. 30–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 For the influence of reason of state on 1620s economic thought, especially the Tacitean nature of Mun's writing, see Poovey, Mary, A history of the modern fact (Chicago, IL, 1998), pp. 66–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Locke, John, Essays on the law of nature, trans. von Leyden, W. (Oxford, 1958), p. 211Google Scholar; see Finkelstein, Harmony and the balance, p. 89.
17 Milton, ‘Locke at Oxford’, p. 37.
18 Boyle, Robert, Some considerations touching the usefulness of experimental natural philosophy, in Hunter, Michael and Davis, Edward B., eds., The works of Robert Boyle (14 vols., London, 1999–2000), iii, pp. 189–561, at pp. 295–6Google Scholar. See also Irving, Sarah, Natural science and the origins of the British empire (London, 2008)Google Scholar.
19 Marshall, Resistance, religion and responsibility, p. 170.
20 Locke, John, An essay concerning toleration, in Milton, J. R. and Milton, Philip, eds., An essay concerning toleration and other writings on law and politics, 1667–1683 (Oxford, 2006), pp. 269–302, at p. 301Google Scholar.
21 Marshall, Resistance, religion and responsibility, p. 173.
22 John Locke, Some of the consequences that are like to follow upon lessening of interest to 4 per cent, in Kelly, ed., Locke on money, i, pp. 162–202, at p. 172. This text is discussed in detail below.
23 Leng, Thomas, Benjamin Worsley (1618–1677): trade, interest and the spirit in revolutionary England (Woodbridge, 2008), p. 118Google Scholar.
24 Worsley, Benjamin, The advocate (London, 1651), prefaceGoogle Scholar.
25 See Locke's 1661 commonplace book, MS Film 77 (Bodleian Library, Oxford University), at fos. 158–71, 171–9, 180–219 continued 253–62, 263–5, 220–31.
26 See Marshall, Resistance, religion and responsibility, pp. 119, 177–80, 121–3. By 1695, Locke argued ‘Faith without Work…is not sufficient for our Justification’ – see Locke, John, The reasonableness of Christianity, ed. Higgins-Biddle, John C. (Oxford, 2000), p. 211Google Scholar. For an emerging contemporary emphasis on the utility of consumption, see Slack, Paul, The invention of improvement: information and material progress in seventeenth-century England (Oxford, 2014), pp. 130–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
27 Locke, John, Two treatises of government, ed. Laslett, Peter (Cambridge, 1988), ii, 5, §26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
28 Locke, John, Of the conduct of the understanding (Bristol, 1993), p. 10Google Scholar.
29 Locke, Two treatises, ii, 5, §§43–5.
30 Ibid., §§34–8.
31 Ibid., §§36–7.
32 Ibid., §§37, 48.
33 Mayhew, N. J., ‘Prices in England, 1170–1750’, Past & Present, 219 (2013), pp. 3–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
34 See the first section of Wennerlind, Casualties of credit.
35 Petty, William, A treatise of taxes and contributions (London, 1667), p. 10Google Scholar.
36 Harrison, John R. and Laslett, Peter, The library of John Locke (Oxford, 1971), pp. 207–8Google Scholar.
37 Cranston, Locke, pp. 90–3, which quotes De arte medica, a manuscript in Locke's hand which reveals the relationship between medicine and Locke's broader theory of knowledge. Also see Coleman, William, ‘The significance of John Locke's medical studies for his economic thought’, History of Political Economy, 32 (2000), pp. 711–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
38 He employed, for instance, the medical metaphor of ‘vent’ twenty-nine times.
39 Child, Josiah, Brief observations concerning trade, and interest of money (London, 1668)Google Scholar.
40 Locke, Some of the consequences, p. 171.
41 Ibid., p. 177.
42 Ibid., p. 191.
43 Joyce Appleby argued that there had been ‘little in the Western philosophical tradition to lend support to the adoption of a market ethic which would dethrone authority and unravel the fabric of social responsibilities’, and Locke was among the first to adopt the idea of natural law as a rationale for the impersonal economic forces of the market. See her ‘Locke, liberalism and the natural law of money’, at p. 44. The argument presented here and below by contrast suggests that Locke's idea of a natural rate of interest was intended to preserve the fabric of social responsibility by encouraging neighbours to lend to one another.
44 Locke, Some of the consequences, p. 182; John Locke, Some considerations of the consequences of lowering of interest and raising the value of money, in Kelly, ed., Locke on money, ii, pp. 209–342, at p. 251, which reads ‘Borrowing Money upon Use is…the necessity of Affairs, and the Constitution of Humane Society.’
45 Patrick Hyde Kelly, ‘General introduction: Locke on money’, in Kelly, ed., Locke on money, ii, pp. 1–109, at p. 76; Carey, Daniel, ‘John Locke, money, and credit’, in Carey, Daniel and Finlay, Christopher J., eds., Empire of credit: financial revolution in the British Atlantic world (Dublin, 2011), pp. 25–52, at p. 41Google Scholar.
46 Locke, Some of the consequences, p. 173; and Locke, Some considerations, p. 235, where it appears as ‘nothing else but an Assurance of Money in some short time’.
47 Kelly, ‘General introduction: Locke on money’, p. 76; Locke, Further considerations concerning raising the value of money, pp. 401–81, at p. 419.
48 Locke, Some considerations, p. 235.
49 See Wennerlind, Casualties of credit, pp. 44–80.
50 Potter, William, A bank of lands (London, 1655), pp. 290, 294Google Scholar; Robinson, Henry, Certain proposalls in order to the peoples freedome and accommodation in some particulars with the advancement of trade and navigation of this commonwealth in general (London, 1652), p. 18Google Scholar.
51 Locke, Some considerations, p. 299.
52 Finkelstein, Harmony and the balance, p. 153. Kelly notes Locke did not realize ‘the extent to which bankers' credit…would lessen the need for metallic coin’ in ‘General introduction: Locke on money’, p. 47. For a helpful overview of seventeenth-century credit instruments, see Kerridge, Eric, Trade and banking in early modern England (Manchester, 1988)Google Scholar.
53 Locke, Some considerations, p. 232.
54 Locke, John, ‘Trade (1674)’, in Goldie, Mark, ed., Locke: political essays (Cambridge, 1997), pp. 212–22, at p. 222CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Locke, Some of the consequences, p. 173.
55 Locke, Some of the consequences, pp. 173–4; these passages are closely repeated in Locke, Some considerations, pp. 234–5.
56 Locke, Some considerations, p. 229.
57 Bacon, Francis, ‘Of usurie’, in Kiernan, Michael, ed., Essayes or counsels civil and moral (Oxford, 1985), pp. 124–9, at pp. 126–8Google Scholar.
58 Locke, Some considerations, pp. 212, 243.
59 Ibid., p. 216; a similar phrase appears in Locke, Some of the consequences, p. 171.
60 Quinn, Stephen, ‘Goldsmith banking: mutual acceptance and interbanker clearing in Restoration London’, Explorations in Economic History, 34 (1997), pp. 411–32, at p. 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
61 Carruthers, Bruce, City of capital: politics and markets in the English financial revolution (Princeton, NJ, 1996), p. 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
62 MS Locke c. 1, fo. 38; Turner, Thomas, The case of bankers and their creditors stated and examined (London, 1674), sig. C2rGoogle Scholar.
63 Turner, The case of bankers, sigs. Br–v.
64 The correspondence of John Locke (8 vols., Oxford, 1976–89) (Correspondence: references are to volume and letter), ii, 297.
65 Locke, Some considerations, p. 215.
66 Ibid., p. 216
67 Ibid., p. 213.
68 Yarranton, Andrew, England's improvement by sea and land (London, 1677), pp. 17–18Google Scholar.
69 Dunn, John, ‘“Trust” in the politics of John Locke’, in Rethinking modern political theory: essays, 1979–1983 (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 34–54Google Scholar; Dunn, John, ‘Trust and political agency’, in Gambetta, Diego, ed., Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations (Oxford, 1988), pp. 73–93, at pp. 80–5Google Scholar.
70 See Goldie, Mark, ‘John Locke and Anglican royalism’, Political Studies, 31 (1983), pp. 61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
71 Dunn, ‘“Trust” in the politics of John Locke’, p. 41.
72 Locke, Two treatises, ii, 15, §171.
73 John Dunn, ‘From applied theology to social analysis: the break between John Locke and the Scottish Enlightenment’, in Rethinking modern political theory, pp. 55–67, esp. pp. 59–60.
74 Locke, Some considerations, p. 229.
75 Locke, Essays on the law of nature, p. 212; Locke, Two treatises, ii, 2, §14.
76 See Tully, James, A discourse on property: John Locke and his adversaries (Cambridge, 1980), p. 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
77 Locke, Two treatises, ii, 8, §§111, 107–8.
78 Ibid., 8, §111; 5, §48; 8, §107.
79 John Locke, ‘Homo ante et post Lapsum (1693)’, in Goldie, ed., Political essays, pp. 320–1.
80 See Tarcov, Nathan, Locke's education for liberty (Chicago, IL, 1984), pp. 141–4Google Scholar.
81 Locke, John, A paraphrase and notes on the Epistles of St Paul to the Galatians, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Romans, Ephesians, ed. Wainwright, Arthur W. (Oxford, 1987), p. 217Google Scholar.
82 ‘Dedication’, in Locke, John, Some thoughts concerning education, ed. Yolton, John W. and Yolton, Jean S. (Oxford, 1989), p. 79Google Scholar.
83 Correspondence, iv, 1669, 1680, 1689. For the role of Clarke, see Woolhouse, Roger, ‘John Locke and Somerset’, Somerset Archaeology and Natural History, 152 (2008), pp. 1–10, at p. 4Google Scholar.
84 Correspondence, iv, 1701; for Codrington as a shopkeeper, see ibid., ii, 776.
85 Ibid., v, 1705. The sums were paid soon afterwards through an assignable debt instrument, as Clarke paid Locke the full sum, receiving from Codrington a bill of £40, with Codrington delaying payment of the remaining £6 8s 6½d (Correspondence, v, 1706; Locke's journal, 8 Feb. 1694, MS Locke f. 10, fo. 218).
86 Correspondence, iv, 1701, v, 1705.
87 For Stratton, see Locke's journal in MS Locke f. 10, fos. 270–1, 3 May 1695, where Locke notes a payment ‘by oversight omitted in his account’, and his accounts in MS Locke c. 1, where p. 119 correspondingly notes a ‘memorand’ that three payments, including the £46 8s 6½d, were ‘not taken notice of here because they belong not to this account which was closed & signed before these sums were paid which are therefore brought account & writ agn p303’; for Shaftesbury, see Correspondence, iv, 1686 and 1689, v, 1719, 1722, 1723, 1724, 1922; and MS Locke f. 10, fos. 231, 241, 280–1; for Pawling, see Correspondence, v, 1715; for another account settling see ibid., v, 1771, 1804, 1871; for the debacle with the bereaved family of Thomas, see ibid., v, 1731, 1733, 1745, 1815, 1937, 1942, 1943, 2081, 2097, 2137; and MS Locke f. 10, fo. 287.
88 Locke especially emphasized the importance of harnessing human motivation in the pursuit of justice during the 1690s. See Marshall, Resistance, religion and responsibility, pp. 319, 329–451, 453. John Locke, ‘Venditio (1695)’, in Goldie, ed., Political essays, pp. 340–3. For this aspect of Cicero's influence on Locke, see Mitsis, Philip, ‘Locke's offices’, in Miller, Jon and Inwood, Brad, eds., Hellenistic and early modern philosophy (Cambridge, 2003), pp. 45–61, at p. 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Marshall, Resistance, religion and responsibility, pp. 303–26.
89 Locke, ‘Venditio’, pp. 340–3.
90 Locke, Some considerations, p. 213.
91 Locke, Some thoughts, §56.
92 John Locke, ‘Reputation (1678)’, in Goldie, ed., Political essays, pp. 271–2, at p. 271.
93 Ibid., p. 272. Note the similarity with Locke's statement about the monetary age in Two treatises, ii, 8, §111, which ‘corrupted Mens minds into a Mistake of true Power and Honour’.
94 Locke, ‘Reputation (1678)’, p. 272.
95 For a detailed outline of such proposals, see Wennerlind, Casualties of credit, pp. 104–21; and Horsefield, J. Keith, British monetary experiments, 1650–1710 (London, 1960)Google Scholar.
96 Yarranton, England's improvement, p. 21. For a similar suggestion, see Anon., Bank-credit: or the usefulness and security of the bank of credit examined in a dialogue between a country gentleman and a London merchant (London, 1683)Google Scholar.
97 Correspondence, v, 2136, 2150. The most extended discussion of this exchange can be found in Reinert, Sophius A., Translating empire: emulation and the origins of political economy (Cambridge, MA, 2011), pp. 97–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
98 Pincus, Steve, 1688: the first modern revolution (New Haven, CT, 2009)Google Scholar, describes Locke as ‘one of the earliest supporters of and investors in the Bank of England’, at p. 371.
99 This is usually the evidence marshalled to suggest his support, following Peter Laslett, , ‘John Locke, the Great Recoinage, and the origins of the Board of Trade: 1695–1698’, William and Mary Quarterly, 14 (1957), pp. 370–402, at p. 365 fn. 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
100 Correspondence, v, 1755.
101 On 5 Oct. 1694: ‘Assignd my stock in the Bank to Mr for £255-’ (MS Locke f. 10, fos. 244–5).
102 Correspondence, v, 1811.
103 MS Locke c. 1, pp. 262–3, 368–9; Woolhouse, ‘Locke and Somerset’, p. 8. On one occasion, Locke told King ‘you need not excuse your not purchaseing of Stock, for I am not fond of it, But perfectly leave it to you to doe with it as if it were your own money…Buy or forbear as you would doe for yourself’ (Correspondence, vii, 2938).
104 Correspondence, v, 1849. For more complaints, see ibid., 1844, 1845, and 1847.
105 Ibid., vii, 3135.
106 MS Locke b. 3, fos. 31–2.
107 Ibid., fo. 31.
108 Ibid., fo. 32. Distrust for the incumbent chancellor of the exchequer, Charles Montagu, who was also involved in devising the bill for the Bank at the treasury, is expressed clearly by the College in Correspondence, v, 2154.
109 MS Locke b. 3, fos. 35–7.
110 Ibid., fo. 35v.
111 Ibid., fo. 36r.
112 Ibid., fos. 36r–v; this seems to accord with Liddell's reflection in Correspondence, v, 1811, that ‘one may perceive…powerfull Court applycations, and the glut of present immergencies’.
113 MS Locke b. 3, fo. 37r.
114 See North, Douglass C. and Weingast, Barry R., ‘Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England’, Journal of Economic History, 49 (1989), pp. 803–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
115 For instance, in Barbon, Nicholas, A discourse of trade (London, 1690), pp. 28–31Google Scholar.
116 Cranston, Locke, p. 313. Locke petitioned William III to pay this debt in 1690, though to no avail.
117 See Murphy, Anne L., ‘Demanding “credible commitment”: public reactions to the failure of the early financial revolution’, Economic History Review, 66 (2013), pp. 178–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Against North and Weingast, Murphy points out that ‘far from being viewed as a credible debtor, the English Parliament was often judged to be financially incompetent and untrustworthy; in fact no more credible than the sovereign’, p. 183.
118 Correspondence, v, 1874.
119 Seiichiro Ito has fruitfully shown that institutional credit required foundation on ‘the same moral underpinnings of trustworthiness and reputation that Muldrew identified as the essential elements supporting pre-institutional credit’. See Ito, Seiichiro, ‘The making of institutional credit in England, 1600–1688’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 18 (2011), pp. 487–519, at p. 489CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
120 Correspondence, v, 2150.
121 Anon., A letter to a friend concerning the credit of the nation and with relation to the present Bank of England as now establish'd by act of parliament (London, 1697), p. 4Google Scholar. See also Anon., Some considerations offered against the continuance of the Bank of England (London, 1694), pp. 1–2Google Scholar.
122 Anon., Observations upon the constitution of the company of the Bank of England (London, 1698), p. 1Google Scholar.
123 Ibid., p. 4.
124 Carey, Daniel, ‘Locke's species: money and philosophy in the 1690s’, Annals of Science, 70 (2013), pp. 357–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Desan, Christine, Making money: coin, currency, and the coming of capitalism (Oxford, 2014), pp. 346–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Courtney Weiss Smith, ‘A “foundation in nature”: new economic criticism and the problem of money in 1690s England’, Eighteenth Century, 53 (2012), pp. 209–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
125 Stefan Eich has recently highlighted the importance of ‘societal trust’ in Locke's approach to the recoinage, though for different reasons. See his ‘John Locke and the politics of monetary depoliticization’, Modern Intellectual History, 17 (2020), pp. 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
