Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

LABOUR'S BRITAIN, FIGHT FOR IT NOW!*

  • LAURA BEERS (a1)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

This article argues for the central role of publicity and propaganda in the Labour party's 1945 landslide election victory. While the ‘swing to the left’ in the first years of the war provided an opportunity for Labour, popular radicalism did not automatically translate into support for the party. The following discussion shows how the national party leadership made use of the BBC, print media, and visual propaganda to associate itself in the popular mind with the successes of the coalition government and the promises of the Beveridge report. While the Conservatives' propaganda machinery fell into abeyance during the war, Labour deftly exploited new means of mass communication which had grown up during the interwar period to build a broad national constituency in favour of its return to power. In order properly to understand the link between ‘high politics’ and popular opinion, political historians need to consider not only the languages through which elite policies were translated and communicated to the public, but also the media of communication. This article argues that, contrary to common perceptions, Labour was successful in 1945 in part because of its ability to embrace and exploit the new mass media to its political advantage.

Copyright
Corresponding author
American University, Department of History, 4400 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20016beers@american.edu
Footnotes
Hide All

Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Contemporary British History seminar at the IHR, the 2008 European Social Science History conference in Lisbon, and the 2008 Pacific Coast Conference on British Studies in Pasadena, and I thank those involved, and particularly Pat Thane and Andrew Thorpe, for their feedback. Special thanks are owed to Lawrence Black, Stephen Brooke, Clare Jackson, and the journal's referees for reading and commenting on earlier versions of this article. Research funding was provided by the Economic and Social Research Council of Great Britain (PTA-026-27-1586).

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Henry Pelling , ‘The 1945 general election reconsidered’, Historical Journal, 23 (1980), pp. 399414, at p. 408.

Steven Fielding , ‘The Second World War and popular radicalism: the significance of the “movement away from party”’, History, 80 (1995), pp. 3858.

Steven Fielding , ‘What did “the people” want?: the meaning of the 1945 general election’, Historical Journal, 35 (1992), pp. 623–39, at pp. 628, 639.

Christopher Howard , ‘Review: “After this, what?”: to 1945 and beyond’, Historical Journal, 28 (1985), pp. 763–70, at p. 764.

Andrew Thorpe , ‘Conservative party agents in Second World War Britain’, Twentieth Century British History, 18 (2007), pp. 334–64, at p. 334

Stephen Brooke , ‘The Labour party and the 1945 general election’, Contemporary Record, 9 (1995), pp. 121.

Mark Franklin and Matthew Lander , ‘The undoing of Winston Churchill: mobilization and conversion in the 1945 realignment of British voters’, British Journal of Political Science, 25 (1995), pp. 429–52.

Lawrence Black , ‘The lost world of young conservatism’, Historical Journal, 51 (2008), pp. 9911024.

James Thompson , ‘Pictorial lies?: posters and politics in Britain, 1880–1914’, Past and Present, 197 (Nov. 2007), pp. 177210.

Steven Fielding , ‘Activists against “affluence”: Labour party culture during the “golden age”, circa 1950–1970’, Journal of British Studies, 40 (2001), pp. 241–67

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Historical Journal
  • ISSN: 0018-246X
  • EISSN: 1469-5103
  • URL: /core/journals/historical-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×