Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:26:34.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE SUBJECTIVE DIMENSION OF NAZISM*

Part of: Historiographical Reviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2013

MORITZ FÖLLMER
MORITZ FÖLLMER*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
*
Department of History, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB, Amsterdam, Netherlandsm.foellmer@uva.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present historiographical review discusses the subjective dimension of Nazism, an ideology and regime that needed translation into self-definitions, gender roles, and bodily practices to implant itself in German society and mobilize it for racial war. These studies include biographies of some of the Third Reich's most important protagonists, which have important things to say about their self-understandings in conjunction with the circumstances they encountered and subsequently shaped; cultural histories of important twentieth-century figures such as film stars, housewives, or consumers, which add new insights to the ongoing debate about the Third Reich's modernity; studies that address participation in the Nazi Empire and the Holocaust through discourses and practices of comradeship, work in extermination camps, and female ‘help’ within the Wehrmacht. In discussing these monographs, along the way incorporating further books and articles, the piece attempts to draw connections between specific topics and think about new possibilities for synthesis in an overcompartmentalized field. It aims less to define a ‘Nazi subject’ than to bring us closer to understanding how Hitler's movement and regime connected different, shifting subject positions through both cohesion and competition, creating a dynamic that kept producing new exclusions and violent acts.

Type
Historiographical Review
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 1107 - 1132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I should like to thank Rüdiger Graf, Armin Nolzen, and two anonymous referees for their comments on previous drafts of this article, as well as Michael Ledger-Lomas for his encouragement and patience.

References

1 On the first view, see Moore, Michaela Hoenicke, Know your enemy: the American debate on Nazism, 1933–1945 (New York, NY, 2010), pp. 217–33Google Scholar; see ibid., p. 56, for the Dorothy Thompson quotation, which is from an article she published in Foreign Affairs in Apr. 1940.

2 Overy, Richard J., Interrogations: the Nazi elite in Allied hands (London, 2002)Google Scholar; Neitzel, Sönke and Welzer, Harald, eds., Soldaten: on fighting, killing and dying: the secret Second World War tapes of German POWs (New York, NY, 2012)Google Scholar; Römer, Felix, Kameraden: Die Wehrmacht von innen (Munich, 2012)Google Scholar.

3 Solchany, Jean, Comprendre le nazisme dans l'Allemagne des années zéro, 1945–1949 (Paris, 1997)Google Scholar; Moeller, Robert, War stories: the search for a usable past in the Federal Republic of Germany (Berkeley, CA, 2001)Google Scholar.

4 Pendas, Devin O., The Frankfurt Auschwitz trial, 1963–1965: genocide, history, and the limits of the law (Cambridge, 2006)Google Scholar.

5 See especially Hans Mommsen's contributions, collected in his From Weimar to Auschwitz: essays in German history (Cambridge, 1991). For a critique, see Berg, Nicolas, Der Holocaust und die westdeutschen Historiker: Erforschung und Erinnerung (Göttingen, 2003)Google Scholar.

6 See Broszat, Martin et al. , eds., Bayern in der NS-Zeit (6 vols., Munich, 1977–83)Google Scholar. Realms of consensus are more apparent in the oral history interviews with industrial workers analysed in Niethammer, Lutz, ed., Lebensgeschichte und Sozialkultur im Ruhrgebiet, 1930–1960 (3 vols., Bonn, 1983–1990)Google Scholar.

7 See, among others, Frei, Norbert, ‘People's community and war: Hitler's popular support’, in Mommsen, Hans, ed., The Third Reich between vision and reality: new perspectives on German history, 1918–1945 (Oxford, 2001), pp. 59–77Google Scholar; Bajohr, Frank and Wildt, Michael, eds., Volksgemeinschaft: Neue Forschungen zur Gesellschaft des Nationalsozialismus (Frankfurt, 2009)Google Scholar; Fritzsche, Peter, Life and death in the Third Reich (Cambridge, MA, 2008)Google Scholar.

8 Wildt, Michael, Hitler's Volksgemeinschaft and the dynamics of racial exclusion: violence against Jews in provincial Germany, 1919–1939 (New York, NY, 2012)Google Scholar; Kühne, Thomas, Belonging and genocide: Hitler's community, 1918–1945 (New Haven, CT, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Diewald-Kerkmann, Gisela, Politische Denunziation im NS-Regime oder Die kleine Macht der Volksgenossen (Bonn, 1995), pp. 92–100Google Scholar, 109–112; Connelly, John, ‘The uses of Volksgemeinschaft: letters to the NSDAP Kreisleitung Eisenach, 1939–1940’, Journal of Modern History, 68 (1996), pp. 899–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Föllmer, Moritz, ‘The problem of national solidarity in interwar Germany’, German History, 23 (2005), pp. 202–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 222–8.

10 Kershaw, Ian, ‘ “Volksgemeinschaft”: Potenzial und Grenzen eines neuen Forschungskonzepts’, Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 59 (2011), pp. 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Evans, Richard J., ‘Coercion and consent in Nazi Germany’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 151 (2007), pp. 53–81Google Scholar. For an important recent monograph that stresses popular reluctance towards the Third Reich's demands, see Stephenson, Jill, Hitler's home front: Württemberg under the Nazis (London, 2006)Google Scholar. For explorations of the Third Reich's coercive apparatus see Caplan, Jane and Wachsmann, Nikolaus, eds., Concentration camps in Nazi Germany: the new histories (London, 2010)Google Scholar.

11 See Lüdtke, Alf, ‘The “honor of labor”: industrial workers and the power of symbols under national socialism’, in Crew, David, ed., Nazism and German society, 1933–1945 (London, 1994), pp. 67–109Google Scholar; Bergerson, Andrew Stuart, Ordinary Germans in extraordinary times: the Nazi revolution in Hildesheim (Bloomington, IN, 2004)Google Scholar.

12 Fulbrook, Mary, Dissonant lives: generations and violence through the German dictatorships (Oxford, 2011), pp. 98–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 165–6, 477.

13 Fritzsche, Life and death, pp. 76–142.

14 See Krylova, Anna, ‘The tenacious liberal subject in Soviet studies’, Kritika, 1 (2000), pp. 119–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hellbeck, Jochen, Revolution on my mind: writing a diary under Stalin (Cambridge, MA, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Halfin, Igal, Terror in my soul: communist autobiographies on trial (Cambridge, MA, 2003)Google Scholar.

15 Fest, Joachim C., Hitler (London, 1974), pp. 3Google Scholar, 4, 8.

16 Kershaw, Ian, Hitler, 1889–1936: hubris (London, 1998)Google Scholar; idem, Hitler, 1936–1945: nemesis (London, 2000).

17 Herbert, Ulrich, Best: Biographische Studien über Radikalismus, Weltanschauung und Vernunft, 1903–1989 (Bonn, 1996)Google Scholar. Compare Jäckel, Eberhard, Hitler's Weltanschauung: a blueprint for power (Middleton, CT, 1972)Google Scholar.

18 Longerich, Peter, Heinrich Himmler (Oxford, 2012)Google Scholar.

19 Gerwarth, Robert, Hitler's hangman: the life of Heydrich (New Haven, CT, 2011)Google Scholar.

20 Epstein, Catherine, Model Nazi: Arthur Greiser and the occupation of western Poland (Oxford, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Thacker, Toby, Joseph Goebbels: life and death (Basingstoke, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Longerich, Peter, Goebbels: Biographie (Munich, 2010)Google Scholar. Longerich's study is also more extensive and places greater emphasis on the institutional context in which Goebbels worked and which often limited his personal power.

22 See Wildt, Michael, An uncompromising generation: the Nazi leadership of the Reich Security Main Office (Madison, WI, 2010)Google Scholar and, in a similar vein, Ingrao, Christian, Believe and destroy: intellectuals in the SS war machine (Cambridge, 2013)Google Scholar.

23 Cited in Epstein, Model Nazi, p. 94. The centrality of the difference between racist norms and actual bodies is highlighted by Diehl, Paula, Macht-Mythos-Utopie: Die Körperbilder der SS-Männer (Berlin, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 The complicity of leading Nazis' wives has been stressed by Schwarz, Gudrun, Die Frau an seiner Seite: Ehefrauen in der ‘SS-Sippengemeinschaft’ (Hamburg, 1997)Google Scholar.

25 Cited in Gerwarth, Hitler's hangman, p. 72. On the relationship between Heydrich and Best and the break between them in 1939, see Herbert, Best, pp. 228–33.

26 See also the characterization of the Reich Security Main Office as a flexible and ever-radicalizing institution in Wildt, Uncompromising generation.

27 Herbst, Ludolf, Hitlers Charisma: Die Erfindung eines deutschen Messias (Frankfurt, 2010)Google Scholar, questions the notion of Hitler's personal charisma, instead interpreting it as a carefully crafted and promulgated myth. Herbst's book is a critique of the extensive use of the concept, especially in Wehler, Hans-Ulrich, Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte, iv: Vom Beginn des Ersten Weltkriegs bis zur Gründung der beiden deutschen Staaten, 1914–1949 (Munich, 2003), pp. 675–83Google Scholar, 935–7.

28 Reactions to this insight included many suicides by devoted Nazis, see Goeschel, Christian, Suicide in Nazi Germany (Oxford, 2009), pp. 152–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 161.

29 Dahrendorf, Ralf, Society and democracy in Germany (New York, NY, 1967)Google Scholar; Schoenbaum, David, Hitler's social revolution: class and status in Nazi Germany, 1933–1939 (Garden City, NY, 1966)Google Scholar.

30 Prinz, Michael and Zitelmann, Rainer, eds., Nationalsozialismus und Modernisierung (Darmstadt, 1991)Google Scholar; Zitelmann, Rainer, Hitler: the politics of seduction (London, 1999)Google Scholar.

31 Mommsen, Hans, ‘Nationalsozialismus als vorgetäuschte Modernisierung’‚ in his Der Nationalsozialismus und die deutsche Gesellschaft: Ausgewählte Aufsätze, ed. Niethammer, Lutz (Hamburg, 1991), pp. 405–27Google Scholar; Frei, Norbert, ‘Wie modern war der Nationalsozialismus?’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 19 (1993), pp. 367–87Google Scholar; Weisbrod, Bernd, ‘Der Schein der Modernität: Zur Historisierung der Volksgemeinschaft’, in Rudolph, Karsten and Wickert, Christel, eds., Geschichte als Möglichkeit: Über die Chancen der Demokratie (Essen, 1995), pp. 224–42Google Scholar.

32 Roseman, Mark, ‘National socialism and modernisation’, in Bessel, Richard, ed., Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany: comparisons and contrasts (Cambridge, 1996), pp. 197–229Google Scholar, at pp. 233–5; Fritzsche, Peter, ‘Nazi Modern’, Modernism/Modernity, 3 (1996), pp. 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 See the comprehensive overview by Bavaj, Riccardo, Die Ambivalenz der Moderne im Nationalsozialismus: Eine Bilanz der Forschung (Oldenbourg, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a critical view, see Roseman, Mark, ‘National socialism and the end of modernity’, American Historical Review, 116 (2011), pp. 688–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Bauman, Zygmunt, Modernity and the Holocaust (Ithaca, NY, 1989)Google Scholar; Peukert, Detlev, Inside Nazi Germany: conformity, opposition, and racism in everyday life (New Haven, CT, 1987)Google Scholar.

35 For a development of this argument, see Föllmer, Moritz, ‘Which crisis? Which modernity? New perspectives on Weimar Germany’, in Hung, Jochen, Weiss-Sussex, Godela, and Wilkes, Geoff, eds., Beyond glitter and doom: the contingency of the Weimar Republic (Munich, 2012), pp. 19–30Google Scholar, at pp. 26–7.

36 Bruns, Jana F., Nazi cinema's new women (Cambridge, 2009)Google Scholar, quotations pp. 6, 9.

37 Rentschler, Erik, Ministry of illusion: Nazi cinema and its afterlife (Cambridge, MA, 1996)Google Scholar; O'Brien, Mary Elizabeth, Nazi cinema as enchantment: the politics of entertainment in the Third Reich (Columbia, SC, 2003)Google Scholar.

38 Reagin, Nancy R., Sweeping the German nation: domesticity and national identity in Germany, 1870–1945 (New York, NY, 2007)Google Scholar.

39 Here, Reagin follows up on the pioneering study by Harvey, Elizabeth, Women and the Nazi east: agents and witnesses of Germanization (New Haven, CT, 2003)Google Scholar, who foregrounds young, independent women.

40 Wiesen, S. Jonathan, Creating the Nazi marketplace: commerce and consumption in the Third Reich (New York, NY, 2011)Google Scholar.

41 Aly, Götz, Hitler's beneficiaries: plunder, race war, and the Nazi welfare state (New York, NY, 2006)Google Scholar.

42 Some of the following arguments have been developed in Föllmer, Moritz, Individuality and modernity in Berlin: self and society from Weimar to the Wall (Cambridge, 2013), pp. 105–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Schürmann, Sandra, Dornröschen und König Bergbau: Kulturelle Urbanisierung und bürgerliche Repräsentationen am Beispiel der Stadt Recklinghausen (1930–1960) (Paderborn, 2005)Google Scholar; Guckes, Jochen, Konstruktionen bürgerlicher Identität: Städtische Selbstbilder in Freiburg, Dresden und Dortmund 1900–1960 (Paderborn, 2011)Google Scholar.

44 Wehler, Hans-Ulrich, ‘Deutsches Bürgertum nach 1945: Exitus oder Phönix aus der Asche?’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 27 (2001), pp. 617–34Google Scholar; Hettling, Manfred and Ulrich, Bernd, eds., Bürgertum nach 1945 (Hamburg, 2005)Google Scholar.

45 Haug, Wolfgang Fritz, Die Faschisierung des bürgerlichen Subjekts: Die Ideologie der gesunden Normalität und die Ausrottungspolitiken im deutschen Faschismus (Berlin, 1986)Google Scholar. It is worth adding that, according to the biographies discussed above, neither in Himmler's nor in Heydrich's nor in Greiser's case was there anything resembling an ideologically charged break with their middle-class fathers. Goebbels's anti-bourgeois attitude was in the end rather inconsistent, see the conclusion in Longerich, Goebbels, pp. 686–7.

46 Lüdtke, ‘The “honor of labor” ’.

47 Föllmer, Individuality and modernity in Berlin, pp. 113–17. On the significance of daily newspapers see Führer, Karl Christian, ‘Die Tageszeitung als wichtigstes Massenmedium der nationalsozialistischen Gesellschaft’, Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft, 55 (2007), pp. 411–34Google Scholar.

48 A further striking example is the integration of culture and artists into a Nazi framework, see Dennis, David B., Inhumanities: Nazi interpretations of Western culture (Cambridge, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Behrenbeck, Sabine, Der Kult um die toten Helden: Nationalsozialistische Mythen, Riten und Symbole (Cologne, 1996), pp. 195–446Google Scholar; Koonz, Claudia, The Nazi conscience (Cambridge, MA, 2003)Google Scholar.

50 See, for instance, Mouton, Michelle, From nurturing the nation to purifying the Volk: Weimar and Nazi family policy, 1918–1945 (New York, NY, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, with rich evidence from Westphalia.

51 Neumann, Boaz, ‘The national socialist politics of life’, New German Critique, 85, Special Issue on Intellectuals (Winter 2002), pp. 107–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Postone, Moishe, ‘Anti-Semitism and national socialism’, in Rabinbach, Anson and Zipes, Jack, eds., Germans and Jews since the Holocaust (New York, NY, 1986), pp. 302–14Google Scholar; Jäckel, Hitler's Weltanschauung, ch. 3.

52 See Longerich, Peter, ‘Davon haben wir nicht gewußt!’: Die Deutschen und die Judenverfolgung, 1933–1945 (Munich, 2006), pp. 129–35Google Scholar.

53 See, for instance, Latzel, Klaus, Deutsche Soldaten – nationalsozialistischer Krieg? Kriegserlebnis – Kriegserfahrung, 1939–1945 (Paderborn, 1998)Google Scholar; Müller, Sven-Oliver, Deutsche Soldaten und ihre Feinde: Nationalismus an Front und Heimatfront im Zweiten Weltkrieg (Frankfurt, 2007)Google Scholar; Werner, Frank, ‘ “Hart müssen wir hier draußen sein”: Soldatische Männlichkeit im Vernichtungskrieg, 1941–1944’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 34 (2008), pp. 5–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 See Föllmer, Individuality and modernity in Berlin, pp. 168–73; Latzel, Klaus, ‘“Freie Bahn dem Tüchtigen!” Kriegserfahrung und Perspektiven für die Nachkriegszeit in Feldpostbriefen aus dem Zweiten Weltkrieg’, in Niedhart, Gottfried and Riesenberger, Dieter, eds., Lernen aus dem Krieg? Deutsche Nachkriegszeiten 1918 und 1945 (Munich, 1992), pp. 331–43Google Scholar.

55 See the concise summary by Herbert, Ulrich, ‘Introduction’, in Herbert, , ed., National socialist extermination policies: contemporary German perspectives and controversies (New York, NY, 2000), pp. 1–28Google Scholar.

56 Browning, Christopher, Ordinary men: reserve police battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (New York, NY, 2002)Google Scholar.

57 Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah, Hitler's willing executioners: ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (New York, NY, 1996)Google Scholar.

58 See the reflections by Roseman, Mark, ‘Beyond conviction? Perpetrators, ideas, and actions in the Holocaust in historiographical perspective’, in Biess, Frank, Roseman, Mark, and Schissler, Hanna, eds., Conflict, catastrophe and continuity: essays on modern German history (New York, NY, 2007), pp. 83–103Google Scholar.

59 Compare Welzer, Harald, Täter: Wie aus ganz normalen Menschen Massenmörder werden (Frankfurt, 2005)Google Scholar, or Bloxham, Donald and Kushner, Tony, The Holocaust: critical historical approaches (Manchester, 2005)Google Scholar, with Hilberg, Raul, Perpetrators, victims, bystanders: the Jewish catastrophe, 1933–1945 (New York, NY, 1992)Google Scholar.

60 Kühne, Belonging and genocide, pp. 5, 4.

61 Koslov, Elissa Mailänder, Gewalt im Dienstalltag: Die SS-Aufseherinnen des Konzentrations- und Vernichtungslagers Majdanek (Hamburg, 2009)Google Scholar.

62 Lüdtke, Alf, ‘Cash, coffee breaks, horseplay: Eigensinn and politics among factory workers in Germany circa 1900’, in Hanagan, Michael and Stephenson, Charles, eds., Confrontation, class consciousness, and the labor process: studies in proletarian class formation (New York, NY, 1986), pp. 65–95Google Scholar.

63 Maubach, Franka, Die Stellung halten: Kriegserfahrungen und Lebensgeschichten von Wehrmachthelferinnen (Göttingen, 2009)Google Scholar.

64 See also Reese, Dagmar, Growing up female in Nazi Germany (Ann Arbor, MI, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 See Mazower, Mark, Hitler's Empire: Nazi rule in occupied Europe (London, 2008)Google Scholar; Harvey, Women and the Nazi east; Pohl, Dieter, Die Herrschaft der Wehrmacht: Deutsche Militärbesatzung und einheimische Bevölkerung in der Sowjetunion, 1941–1944 (Munich, 2008)Google Scholar.

66 See also Patel, Kiran Klaus, ‘“Auslese” und “Ausmerze”: Das Janusgesicht der nationalsozialistischen Lager’, Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft, 54 (2006), pp. 339–65Google Scholar.

67 Maubach, Die Stellung halten, pp. 22, 41.

68 Bajohr, Frank, ‘Mass murder and community building’, German History, 30 (2012), pp. 120–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 122–4.

69 Roseman, Mark in Social History, 36 (2011), pp. 372–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 Kühne, Belonging and genocide, p. 157.

71 Bajohr and Wildt, eds., Volksgemeinschaft.

72 Armin Nolzen, ‘Inklusion und Exlusion im “Dritten Reich”: Das Beispiel der NSDAP’, in Bajohr and Wildt, eds., Volksgemeinschaft, pp. 60–77; Nolzen, , ‘Charismatic legitimation and bureaucratic rule: the NSDAP in the Third Reich, 1933–1945’, German History, 23 (2005), pp. 498–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also important recent work on financial bureaucrats’ contribution to the Holocaust or on the managerial side of the SS: Aly, Hitler's beneficiaries, part iii; Allen, Michael Thad, The Business of genocide: the SS, slave labor, and the concentration camps (Chapel Hill, NC, 2002)Google Scholar.

73 Geyer, Michael, ‘Aggressiver Individualismus und Gemeinschaftsideologie’, Zeithistorische Forschungen, 1 (2004), pp. 87–91Google Scholar; Baranowski, Shelley, Strength through joy: consumerism and mass tourism in the Third Reich (Cambridge, 2004), p. 43Google Scholar; Harvey, Women and the Nazi east, p. 15; see Föllmer, Individuality and modernity, part ii.

74 See the title of the path-breaking study by Streit, Christian, Keine Kameraden: Die Wehrmacht und die sowjetischen Kriegsgefangenen, 1941–1945 (Bonn, 1978)Google Scholar.

75 Maubach, Die Stellung halten, pp. 123–7.

76 Corni, Gustavo, Hitler's ghettos: voices from a beleaguered society, 1939–1944 (London, 2002), pp. 135–7Google Scholar, 155; Obenaus, Herbert, ‘Der Kampf um das tägliche Brot’, in Herbert, Ulrich, Orth, Karin, and Dieckmann, Christoph, eds., Die nationalsozialistischen Konzentrationslager: Entwicklung und Struktur (Frankfurt, 2002), pp. 841–73Google Scholar.

77 Browning, Christopher R., Remembering survival: inside a Nazi slave-labor camp (New York, NY, 2010)Google Scholar. The notion of ‘choiceless choices’ has been coined by Langer, Lawrence in Versions of survival: the Holocaust and the human spirit (Albany, NY, 1982)Google Scholar.

78 Welzer, Täter, pp. 220–45; Bloxham, Donald, The Final Solution: a genocide (Oxford, 2009), pp. 261–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

79 See, for instance, Fulda, Daniel et al. , eds., Demokratie im Schatten der Gewalt: Geschichten des Privaten im deutschen Nachkrieg (Göttingen, 2010)Google Scholar; Goltermann, Svenja, Die Gesellschaft der Überlebenden: Kriegsheimkehrer und ihre Gewalterfahrungen im Zweiten Weltkrieg (Munich, 2009)Google Scholar.

80 Fritzsche, Peter and Hellbeck, Jochen, ‘The new man in Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany’, in Geyer, Michael and Fitzpatrick, Sheila, eds., Beyond totalitarianism: Stalinism and Nazism compared (New York, NY, 2009), pp. 302–41Google Scholar; Griffin, Roger, Modernism and Fascism: the sense of a beginning under Mussolini and Hitler (Basingstoke, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 Geyer, Michael, ‘Restorative elites, German society and the Nazi pursuit of war’, in Bessel, , ed., Fascist Italy, pp. 134–64Google Scholar, at p. 160.