Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:16:54.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divided by Loyalty: The Debate Regarding Loyalty Provisions in the National Defense Education Act of 1958

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Brent D. Maher
Brent D. Maher*
Affiliation:
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The National Defense Education Act (NDEA) of 1958 was the first federal investment in low-interest student loans and became a precedent for expansion of student loans in the Higher Education Act of 1965. In its controversial loyalty provisions, the NDEA required loan recipients to affirm loyalty to the U.S. government. Between 1958 and 1962, thirty-two colleges and universities refused to participate or withdrew from the NDEA loan program, arguing that the loyalty provisions unfairly targeted students and violated principles of free inquiry. This essay argues that debate over the loyalty provisions fractured a partnership between progressives who favored general aid to education and conservatives who supported short-term investment for defense purposes. Although debates over the NDEA loyalty requirements seem specific to the Cold War, a close examination of the arguments illuminates their alignment with long-standing ideological conflicts over legitimacy of federal aid to higher education.

Type
Articles
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 301 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Suspitsyna, Tatiana, “Higher Education for Economic Advancement and Engaged Citizenship: An Analysis of the U.S. Department of Education Discourse,” Journal of Higher Education 83, no. 1 (2012), 49–72; and Shear, Michael D., “Colleges Rattled as Obama Seeks Rating System,” New York Times, 26 May 2014, A1.Google Scholar

2 Urban, Wayne J., More than Science and Sputnik: The National Defense Education Act of 1958 (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2010), 1–9.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., 184.Google Scholar

4 Botti, John McDonough, “The NDEA, Loyalty, and Community: Resistance at Two Liberal Arts Colleges” (PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, 2014); and Clowse, Barbara Barksdale, Brainpower for the Cold War: The Sputnik Crisis and National Defense Education Act of 1958 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1981).Google Scholar

5 Loss, Christopher P., Between Citizens and the State: The Politics of American Higher Education in the 20th Century, Politics and Society in Twentieth-Century America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012), 1–16, 156–61; and Schwegler, John Stephan, “Academic Freedom and the Disclaimer Affidavit of the National Defense Education Act: The Response of Higher Education” (EdD dissertation, Teachers College Columbia University, 1982), 128–38.Google Scholar

6 Higher Education for American Democracy: A Report of the President's Commission on Higher Education (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1948); Loss, Between Citizens and the State, 118; and Hutcheson, Philo A., “The 1947 President's Commission on Higher Education and the National Rhetoric on Higher Education Policy,” History of Higher Education Annual 22, no. 1 (2002), 91–102.Google Scholar

7 Simpson, Alfred D., “Financing Higher Education,” Journal of Higher Education 19, no. 4 (April 1948), 202.Google Scholar

8 Freeland, Richard M., Academia's Golden Age: Universities in Massachusetts, 1945–1970 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Hutcheson, “The 1947 President's Commission,” 97.Google Scholar

10 Ibid.; and Reuben, Julie A and Perkins, Linda, “Introduction: Commemorating the Sixtieth Anniversary of the President's Commission Report, ‘Higher Education for Democracy,”’ History of Education Quarterly 47, no. 3 (August 2007), 265–76.Google Scholar

11 Urban, More than Science and Sputnik, 48–65.Google Scholar

12 Ibid.Google Scholar

13 Ibid.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., 65.Google Scholar

15 Clowse, Brainpower for the Cold War, 125–27.Google Scholar

16 85 Cong. Rec. 19,086 (1958).Google Scholar

17 Clowse, Brainpower for the Cold War, 137.Google Scholar

18 85 Cong. Rec. 19,596 (1958).Google Scholar

19 Clowse, Brainpower for the Cold War, 138.Google Scholar

20 Divine, Robert A., The Sputnik Challenge (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), 165.Google Scholar

21 Henry, David D., “The Role of the Federal Government in Higher Education,” Educational Record 40, no. 3 (July 1959), 197.Google Scholar

22 U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, The National Defense Education Act of 1958: A Summary and Analysis of the Act (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1958), 1–2; Urban, More than Science and Sputnik, 2–4.Google Scholar

23 National Defense Education Act of 1958: Hearing before Subcommittees of the Committee on Education and Labor of the House of Representatives, Eighty-sixth Congress, First Session. (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1959), 3.Google Scholar

24 U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, The National Defense Education Act, Sec. 202.Google Scholar

25 Clowse, Brainpower for the Cold War, 131–32; Urban, More than Science and Sputnik, 184–85.Google Scholar

26 Kirshen, H. B., “The Internal Security Act of 1950,” Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors 37, no. 2 (July 1951), 260–75.Google Scholar

27 U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, The National Defense Education Act, Sec. 1001(f), 45.Google Scholar

28 Schwegler, “Academic Freedom” 99–100.Google Scholar

29 85 Cong. Rec., 2nd Sess., 17,320 (1958).Google Scholar

30 Schwegler, “Academic Freedom”; and “Colleges Oppose U.S. Non-Red Oath: 6 Schools Denounce Pledge as Condition for Student Loan Under’ 58 Act,” New York Times, 22 January 1959, 12.Google Scholar

31 “College to Return Aid: Bennington Says It Opposes Oaths Required by U.S.,” New York Times, 7 May 1959, 66; “A College Rejects Student-Loan Aid,” New York Times, 10 October 1959, 12; and “Oberlin Fights Oath: Quits Student Loan Plan and Returns $68,146 to U.S.,” New York Times 17 November 1959, 28.Google Scholar

32 “Government Security Checks: Statement of the Haverford College Faculty,” AAUP Bulletin 44, no. 2 (June 1958), 401–2.Google Scholar

33 Glass, Bentley and Fidler, William P., “Disclaimer Affidavit Requirement: Association Officers Express Disapproval of Title X, Section 1001 (F) (1) of the National Defense Education Act of 1958,” AAUP Bulletin 44, no. 4 (December 1958), 771.Google Scholar

34 Griswold, A. Whitney, “Loyalty: An Issue of Academic Freedom,” New York Times Magazine, 20 December 1959, SM42.Google Scholar

35 Ibid., 47.Google Scholar

36 Loss, Between Citizens and the State, 159; Urban, More than Science and Sputnik, 183–84.Google Scholar

37 86 Cong. Rec., 1st Sess. 14,096, (1959).Google Scholar

38 Eckelberry, R. H., “Editorial: The Disclaimer Affidavit,” Journal of Higher Education 31, no. 3 (March 1960), 159–60.Google Scholar

39 86 Cong. Rec., 1st Sess., 14,096 (1959).Google Scholar

40 Andrew, John A., The Other Side of the Sixties: Young Americans for Freedom and the Rise of Conservative Politics (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1997), 53–74.Google Scholar

41 “Second Session at Half Way Point,” Congressional Digest 39, no. 4 (April 1960), 126.Google Scholar

42 Ibid., 108.Google Scholar

43 Ibid., 126.Google Scholar

44 86 Cong. Rec., 1st Sess., 14,075 (1959).Google Scholar

45 Costanzo, Joseph F., “Loyalty Oath Affidavit,” University of Detroit Law Journal 37, no. 5 (June 1960), 721.Google Scholar

46 “Disclaimer Affidavit: Non-Participating and Disapproving Colleges and Universities,” AAUP Bulletin 48, no. 4 (December 1962), 331.Google Scholar

47 Chayes, Abram J., “Abram J. Chayes Oral History Interview—JFK #1,” in John F. Kennedy Oral History Collection (John F. Kennedy Presidential Library, 1964), 53–58, http://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/Archives/JFKOH-ABJC-01.aspx Google Scholar

48 Burns, James MacGregor, John Kennedy: A Political Profile (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961), 268.Google Scholar

49 Kennedy, John Fitzgerald, “Loyalty Oath: An Obstacle to Better Education,” AAUP Bulletin 45, no. 1 (March 1959), 25.Google Scholar

50 Ibid.Google Scholar

51 “Education: Loyalty Oath and Disclaimer Affidavit,” Papers of John F. Kennedy. Pre-Presidential Papers. Presidential Campaign Files, 1960 (John F. Kennedy Presidential Library, Undated), 2.Google Scholar

52 Kennedy, “Loyalty Oath,” 26.Google Scholar

53 Joughin, Louis, “Disclaimer Affidavit,” AAUP Bulletin 45, no. 3 (September 1959), 339–41.Google Scholar

54 Griswold, “Loyalty,” 18.Google Scholar

55 Kenworthy, E. W., “Senate Votes End of Student Oath: Acts to Bar Non-communist Pledge Opposed by Many Leading Universities,” New York Times, 16 June 1960, 1; and Schwegler, “Academic Freedom,” 116–17.Google Scholar

56 “Second Session at Half Way Point,” 113.Google Scholar

57 Ibid., 119.Google Scholar

58 86 Cong. Rec., 1st Sess., 14,074 (1959).Google Scholar

59 Ibid., 14,068.Google Scholar

60 Ibid., 14,071.Google Scholar

61 86 Cong. Rec., 2nd Sess., 12,663 (1960).Google Scholar

62 Ibid., 12,666–67.Google Scholar

63 Ibid., 12,667.Google Scholar

64 86 Cong. Rec. 1st Sess, 14,098 (1959)Google Scholar

65 86 Cong. Rec., 2nd Sess., 12,664 (1960).Google Scholar

66 “Second Session at Half Way Point,” 118.Google Scholar

67 86 Cong. Rec., 2nd Sess., 12666 (1960).Google Scholar

68 Ibid., 12667.Google Scholar

69 Ibid.Google Scholar

70 Ibid.Google Scholar

71 Ibid.Google Scholar

72 Ibid.Google Scholar

73 Schweder, “Academic Freedom,” 123; Orentlicher, Herman I., “Disclaimer Affidavit: A Valediction,” AAUP Bulletin 48, no. 4 (Dec. 1962): 324–30; and “Exit: College Affidavit,” New York Times, 18 October 1962, 38.Google Scholar

74 Orentlicher, “Disclaimer Affidavit,” 327.Google Scholar

75 Ibid.Google Scholar

76 “Letters to the Times,” New York Times, 30 October 1962, 34.Google Scholar

77 Ibid.Google Scholar

78 Graham, Hugh Davis, The Uncertain Triumph: Federal Education Policy in the Kennedy and Johnson Years (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984), 28–29.Google Scholar

79 Ibid., 28–32.Google Scholar

80 Ibid., 35.Google Scholar

81 Ibid., 50–52; and The Higher Education Facilities Act of 1963: H.R. 6143, Introduced by Representative Edith Green (Oregon), Research American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy ed. (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1963), 1–16.Google Scholar

82 Green, Edith, Education and the Public Good: The Federal Role in Education, The Burton Lecture (Cambridge, MA: Distributed for the Graduate School of Education of Harvard University by Harvard University Press, 1964), 13.Google Scholar

83 Graham, The Uncertain Triumph, 53–83.Google Scholar

84 Hunter, Majorie, “College Aid Bill Passed by the House, 367 to 22,” New York Times, 27 August 1965, 1.Google Scholar

85 Morris, John D., “Senate Votes, 79–3, for College Aid Bill: Senate Approves College Aid Bill,” New York Times 3 September 1965, 1.Google Scholar

86 “Lyndon B. Johnson, Remarks at Southwest Texas State College Upon Signing the Higher Education Act of 1965,” 8 November 1965, The American Presidency Project, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=27356&st=johnson&st1=higher+education.Google Scholar