Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-05T14:02:43.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Abortion Ethics: Rights and Responsibilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Elisabeth Porter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abortion considerations require deep reflection on law, convention, social mores, religious norms, family contexts, emotions, and relationships. I have three arguments. First, a liberal “right to choose” framework is inadequate because it is based on individualist notions of rights. Second, reproductive freedoms should be extended to all women. Third, abortion ethics involves a dialectical interplay between rights and responsibilities, and between social, cultural, and particular contexts, and is best understood in terms of moral praxis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , Summer 1994 , pp. 66 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Areen, Judith. 1989. Limiting procreation. In Medical Ethics, ed.Veatch, Robert. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
Brazier, Margaret. 1988. Embryo's “rights”: Abortion and research. In Medicine, ethics and the law, ed.Freeman, M. D. A.London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
Clarke, Linda. 1991. Abortion: A rights issue? In Birthrights: Law and ethics at the beginning of life, ed.Lee, Robert and Morgan, Derek. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah. 1991. Privatizing the state: Reproductive rights, affirmative action, and the problem of democracy. Frontiers 12(1): 98–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox‐Genovese, Elizabeth. 1991. Feminism without illusions: A critique of individualism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1983. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Faye. 1989. Dissonance and harmony: The symbolic function of abortion in activists' life stories. In Interpreting women's lives: Feminist theory and personal narratives, ed.Group, Personal Narratives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1987. Abortion and divorce in western law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1989. The transformation of family law: State, law, and family in the U.S. and westem Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, Paul. 1987. The logic of special rights. Hypatia 2(1): 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greschner, Donna. 1989. Feminist concerns with the new communitarians: We don't need another hero. In Law and the community: The end of individualism? ed.Hutchinson, Allan C. and Green, Leslie. Toronto: Carswell.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1979. Communication and the evolution of society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1991. Should we experiment on embryos? In Birthrights: Law and ethics at the beginnings of life, ed.Lee, Robert and Morgan, Derek. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1963. Law, liberty and morality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasse, Lizbeth. 1987. Legalizing gender‐specific values. In Women and moral theory, ed.Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T.New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Himmelweit, Susan. 1988. More than “a woman's right to choose”? Feminist Review 29: 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1976. Abortion and a woman's right to decide. In Women and philosophy: Toward a theory of liberation, ed.Gould, Carol C. and Wartofsky, Marx W.New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Morris B. 1991. Autonomy, equality, community: The question of lesbian and gay rights. Praxis International 11(2): 195–213.Google Scholar
Ketting, Evert and Praag, Philip van. 1986. The marginal relevance of legislation relating to induced abortion. In The new politics of abortion, ed.Lovenduski, Joni. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kingdom, Elizabeth. 1991. What's wrong with rights?Problems for feminist politics of law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald. 1985. Liberty and community in constitutional law: The abortion cases in comparative perspective. Brigham Young University Law Review 371:399–409.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald. 1990. Comment on Maclntyre. Review of Politics 52: 364–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Linda. 1987. Through a glass darkly: Paradigms of equality and the search for a woman's jurisprudence. Hypatia 2(1): 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Robert and Derek, Morgan, eds. 1991. Birthrights:Law and ethics at the beginnings of life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luthra, Rashmi. 1993. Toward a reconceptualization of “choice”: Challenges by women at the margins. Feminist Issues 13(1): 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclntyre, Alisdair. 1982. After virtue. A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Maclntyre, Alisdair. 1990. The privatization of good: An inaugural lecture. Review of Politics 52: 344–61.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Sally. 1990. Abortion and feminism. Social Theory and Practice 16(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, Mary. 1983. The politics of reproduction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Overall, Christine. 1987. Ethics and human reproduction: A feminist analysis. Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. 1980. Reproductive freedom: Beyond “a woman's right to choose.” In Women, Sex and sexuality, ed.Stimpson, Catherine R., and Person, Ethel Spector. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. 1986. Abortion and woman's choice: The state, sexuality, and reproductive freedom. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Porter, Elisabeth. 1991. Women and moral identity. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Riddicks, Ruth. 1990. The right to choose: Questions of feminist morality. Dublin: Attic Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1984. Morality and the liberal ideal. The New Republic 7: 15.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1989. Moral argument and liberal toleration: Abortion and homosexuality. Californian Law Review 77: 521–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Douglas. 1991. Collective rights. Human Rights Quarterly 13: 368–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Elizabeth M. 1990. The dialectic of rights and politics: Perspectives from the women's movement. In Women, the state, and welfare, ed.Gordon, Linda. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Schuler, Jeanne. 1987-88. Baby M and the politics of gender. Telos 74: 126–33.Google Scholar
Smith, Janet Farrell. 1984. Rights‐conflict, pregnancy and abortion. In Beyond domination: New perspectives on women and philosophy, ed.Gould, Carol. New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Tao, Julia. 1990. The Chinese moral ethos and the concept of individual rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 7(2): 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1973. A defense of abortion. In The problem of abortion, ed.Feinberg, Joel. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Warnock, Mary. 1985. A question of life: The Wamock report on human fertilisation and embryology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Warren, Mary Ann. 1989. The moral significance of birth. Hypatia 4(3): 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Carl. 1989. Doing justice to rights. Hypatia 3(3): 153–58.Google Scholar
Wolgast, Elizabeth. 1980. Equality and the rights of women. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wolgast, Elizabeth. 1989. A reply to Carl Wellman. Hypatia 3(3): 159–61.Google Scholar