Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T06:42:28.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deleuze and Guattari's Absent Analysis of Patriarchy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020


Feminist philosophy has offered mixed opinions on the collaborative projects of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. But although there has been much discussion of the political expediency of what Deleuze and Guattari do say about sexual difference, this article will outline what is absent from Anti‐Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus (the two volumes comprising Capitalism and Schizophrenia). Specifically, I will argue that though Deleuze and Guattari offer a historical account of a range of power structures—most notably capitalism, but also despotism, fascism, and authoritarianism—they give no such account of the development of patriarchy. Secondarily, this article will argue that Deleuze and Guattari's analysis of contemporary power relations could be improved by adding an accompanying analysis of the institution of patriarchy. After offering a detailed account of the technical vocabulary used by Deleuze and Guattari for the analysis of political institutions, I will argue that what their work requires is an account of how patriarchy is historically produced by an “abstract machine” of masculinity. This article will finish with some suggestions for the way that such an account could be given via an analysis of the abstract machine of phallusization.

Copyright © 2019 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


de Beauvoir, Simone. 2009. The second sex. Trans. Constance Borde and Sheila Malovany‐Chevallier. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Bignall, Simone. 2013. Dismantling the white‐man face: Racialization, faciality and the Palm Island Riot. In Deleuze and race, ed. Saldanha, Arun and Michael Adams, Jason. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Norman. 1953. Conflicting interpretations of the rise of capitalism: Marx and Weber. British Journal of Sociology 4 (2): 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonta, Mark and Protevi, John. 2004. Deleuze and Geophilosophy: A Guide and Glossary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 2003. Becoming woman: Or sexual difference revisited. Theory, Culture & Society 20 (3): 4364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colebrook, Claire, and Buchanan, Ian, eds. 2000. Deleuze and feminist theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Colebrook, Claire, and Weinstein, Jami, eds. 2008. Deleuze and gender. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Coward, Rosalind. 1983. Patriarchal precedence: Sexuality and social relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1995. Negotiations. Trans. Martin Joughin. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. 2004. A thousand plateaus. Trans. Brian Massumi. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. 2012. Anti‐Oedipus. Trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dolphijn, Rick, and van der Tuin, Iris. 2013. A thousand tiny intersections: Linguisticism, feminism, racism and Deleuzian becomings. In Deleuze and race, ed. Saldanha, Arun and Michael Adams, Jason. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah. 1986. The radical future of liberal feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Nick, and Alldred, Pam. 2013. The sexuality‐assemblage: Desire, affect, anti‐humanism. Sociological Review 61 (4): 769–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1981. Totem and taboo. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume XIII. Trans. James Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Griggers, Camilla. 1997. Becoming‐woman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1993. A thousand tiny sexes: Feminism and rhizomatics. Topoi 12 (2): 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, J. J., Pérez‐Mercader, J., and Zurek, W. H., eds. 1994. Physical origins of time asymmetry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Eugene. 1999. Deleuze and Guattari's Anti‐Oedipus: Introduction to schizoanalysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigiray, Luce. 1985. The blind spot of an old dream of symmetry. In Speculum of the other woman. Trans. Gillian C. Gill. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, Alice. 1984. Woman in limbo: Deleuze and his br(others). SubStance 13 (3/4): 4660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Alice. 1985. Gynesis: Configurations of woman and modernity. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Koerner, Michelle. 2011. Line of escape: Gilles Deleuze's encounter with George Jackson. Genre 44 (2): 157180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas. 2003. Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lundy, Craig. 2013. Why wasn't capitalism born in China?—Deleuze and the philosophy of non‐events. Theory and Event 16 (3): 16.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1982. Capital: A critique of political economy, volume one. Trans. Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rovelli, Carlo. 2014. Seven brief lessons on physics. Trans. Simon Carnell and Erica Segre. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sibertin‐Blanc, Guillaume. 2016. State and politics: Deleuze and Guattari on Marx. Trans. Ames Hodges. South Pasadena, Calif.: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Stark, Hannah. 2017. Feminist theory after Deleuze. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Edward. 2017. The rise of the machines: Deleuze's flight from structuralism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (4): 454–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar