Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-28T18:30:29.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Essentially Speaking”: Luce Irigaray's Language of Essence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Diana J. Fuss
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Luce Irigaray's fearlessness towards speaking the body has earned for her work the dismissive label “essentialist.” But Irigaray's Speculum de l'autre femme and Ce Sexe qui n'en est pas un suggest that essence may not be the unitary, monolithic, in short, essentialist category that anti-essentialists so often presume it to be. Irigaray strategically deploys essentialism for at least two reasons: first, to reverse and to displace Jacques Lacan's phallomorphism; and second, to expose the contradiction at the heart of Aristotelian metaphysics which denies women access to “Essence” while at the same time positing the essence of “Woman” precisely as non-essential (as matter).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 3 , Issue 3: Special Issue: French Feminist Philosophy , Winter 1988 , pp. 62 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abel, Elizabeth, ed. 1982. Writing and sexual difference. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Parveen and Brown, Beverly. 1979. The feminine body and feminist politics. m/f 3: 35–50.Google Scholar
Burke, Carolyn. 1978. Report from Paris: Women's writing and the women's movement. Signs 3(4): 843–55.10.1086/493542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Carolyn. 1981. Irigaray through the looking glass. Feminist Studies 7(2): 288–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Man, Paul. 1984. The rhetoric of romanticism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Delphy, Christine. 1984. Close to home: A materialist analysis of women's oppression. Trans.Leonard, Diana. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Doane, Mary Ann. 1981. Woman's stake: Filming the female body. October 17: 23–36.10.2307/778247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauré, Christine. 1981. The twilight of the goddesses, or the intellectual crisis of french feminism. Signs 7(1): 81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féral, Josette. 1981. Towards a theory of displacement. Substance 32: 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1981. Phallus/penis: Same difference. In Men by women. Vol. 2 of Women and literature, ed. Todd, Janet. New York and London: Holmes & Meier, 243‐‐51.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1982a. The daughter's seduction: Feminism and psychoanalysis. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1982b. Writing and sexual difference: The difference within. Critical Inquiry (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1983. Quand nos Lèvres s'écrivent: Irigaray's body politic. Romanic Review 74(1): 77–83.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1985. Reading Lacan. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Stephen. 1978. Difference. Screen 19(3): 50–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1977. Women's exile. Ideology and Consciousness 1(May): 62–76.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985a. Is the subject of science sexed? Cultural Critique 1(Fall): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. Speculum of the other woman. Trans.Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. Trans. of Speculum de l'autre femme. Paris: Minuit, 1974.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985c. This sex which is not one. Trans.Porter, Catherine with Burke, Carolyn. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. Trans. of Ce Sexe qui n'en est pas un. Paris: Minuit, 1977.Google Scholar
Jacobus, Mary. 1982. The question of language: men of maxims and The mill on the floss. In Writing and sexual difference; ed. Abel, Elizabeth. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 37‐‐52.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman and Halle, Morris. 1956. Fundamentals of language. ‘S‐Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jardine, Alice and Smith, Paul, eds. 1987. Men in feminism. New York and London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Alice. 1987. Men in feminism: Odor di uomo or compagnons de route? In Men in feminism, eds.Jardine, Alice and Smith, Paul. New York: Methuen, 54‐‐61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Barbara. 1984. Metaphor, metonymy and voice in Their eyes were watching god. In Black literature and literary theory, ed. Louis Gates, Henry Jr. New York: Methuen, 205‐‐219.Google Scholar
Jones, Ann Rosalind. 1985. Inscribing femininity: French theories of the feminine. In Making a difference: Feminist literary criticism, eds.Greene, Gayle and Kahn, Coppélia. London and New York: Methuen, 80–112.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jaques. 1977. Écrits. Trans.Sheridan, Alan. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Leitch, Vincent. 1983. Deconstructive criticism: An advanced introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Elaine. 1978. Women and literature in France. Signs 3(4):832–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, Richard, ed. 1941. The basic works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy K. 1980. Women's autobiography in France: For a dialectics of identification. Women and language in literature and society, eds.McConnell‐Ginet, Sally, Borker, Ruth, and Furman, Nelly. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Juliet and Rose, Jacqueline. 1982. Feminine sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the école freudienne. New York: W. W. Norton and Company. 10.1007/978-1-349-16861-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moi, Toril. 1985. Sexual/textual politics. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Plaza, Monique. 1978. “Phallomorphic power” and the psychology of “woman.” Ideology and Consciousness 4(Autumn):57–76. Originally published in Questions féministes 1(1978).Google Scholar
Ruthven, K. K. 1984. Feminist literary studies: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi. 1986. Introducing feminism. Paragraph 8. Oxford University Press: 94–101.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi. 1987. Dreaming dissymmetry: Barthes, Foucault, and sexual difference. In Men in feminism. Jardine and Smith, 98–110.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. 1982. Feminist criticism in the wilderness. In Writing and sexual difference, ed. Abel, Elizabeth. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 9‐‐36.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1987. In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. New York and London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Whitford, Margaret. 1986. Luce Irigaray and the female imaginary: Speaking as a woman. Radical Philosophy 43(Summer):3–8.Google Scholar
Wittig, Monique. 1980. The straight mind. Feminist Issues (Summer): 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittig, Monique. 1981. One is not born a woman. Feminist Issues (Fall): 47–54.Google Scholar