Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-7j4dq Total loading time: 0.269 Render date: 2022-10-05T15:38:26.325Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Article contents

Ground, Pivot, Motion: Ecofeminist Theory, Dialogics, and Literary Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020


Ecofeminist philosophy and literary theory need mutually to enhance each other's critical praxis. Ecofeminism provides the grounding necessary to turn the Bakhtinian dialogic method into a critical theory applicable to all of one's lived experience, while dialogics provides a method for advancing the application of ecofeminist thought in terms of literature, the other as speaking subject, and the interanimation of human and nonhuman aspects of nature. In the first part of this paper the benefits of dialogics to feminism and ecofeminism are explored; in the second part dialogics as method is detailed; in the third part literary examples are discussed from a dialogical ecofeminist perspective.

Research Article
Copyright © 1991 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Atwood, Margaret. 1972. Surfacing. New York: Popular Library. New York: Fawcett Crest, 1987.Google Scholar
Atwood, Margaret. 1985. The handmaid's tale. New York: Fawcett Crest, 1987.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Holquist, Michael and Emerson, Caryl, trans. Holquist, Michael, ed. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Emerson, Caryl, trans. and ed. Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. McGee, Vern W., Trans.Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael, eds. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Dale M. 1988. Feminist dialogics: A theory of failed community. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bruss, Neal H. 1976. V. N. Vološinov and the structure of language in freudianism. In Freudianism: A Marxist critique. See Vološinov [Bakhtin], 1976.Google Scholar
Burgess, Cheryll. 1989. Toward an ecological literary criticism. Paper presented at the twenty‐fourth Western Literature Association meeting, October, Coeur de'Alene, Idaho.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sue Ellen. 1989. The land and language of desire: Where deep ecology and post‐structuralism meet. Western American Literature 24: 199211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cather, Willa. 1915. The song of the lark. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1983.Google Scholar
Charnas, Susy McKee. 1974. Walk to the end of the world. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Charnas, Susy McKee. 1978. Motherlines. New York: Berkeley, 1979.Google Scholar
Cheney, Jim. 1989. Postmodern environmental ethics: Ethics as bioregional narrative. Environmental Ethics 11: 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz‐Diocaretz, Myriam. 1989. Bakhtin, discourse, and feminist theories. Critical Studies 1(2): 121–39.Google Scholar
Finch, Robert, and Elder, John, eds. 1990. The Norton book of nature writing. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gearhart, Sally. 1979. The wanderground: Stories of the hill women. Boston: Alyson Publications.Google Scholar
Griffin, Susan. 1978. Woman and nature: The roaring inside her. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Hampl, Patricia. 1983. Resort. In Resort and other poems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Heath, Stephen. 1987. Male Feminism. In Men in feminism. Jardine, Alice and Smith, Paul, eds. New York: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Barbara. 1987. A world of difference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, Hwa Yol. 1990. The way of ecopiety: Ethics as if the earth really matters. Paper presented at “The Shadow of Spirit: Contemporary Western Thought and Its Religious Subtexts” conference, July, King's College, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
King, Ynestra. 1983a. The eco‐feminist imperative. In Reclaim the earth: Women speak out for life on earth. Caldecott, Léonie and Leland, Stephanie, eds. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
King, Ynestra. 1983b. Toward an ecological feminism and a feminist ecology. In Machina ex dea: Feminist perspectives on technology. Rothschild, Joan, ed. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Annette. 1975. The lay of the land: Metaphor as experience and history in American life and letters. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Le Guin, Ursula K. 1981. Hard words and other poems. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Le Guin, Ursula K. 1985. Always coming home. New York: Bantam, 1986.Google Scholar
Le Guin, Ursula K. 1987. Buffalo gals and other animal presences. New York: New American Library, 1988.Google Scholar
Le Guin, Ursula K. 1988. Wild oats and fireweed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Lenin, V.I. 1961. Philosophical notebooks. Vol. 38 of Collected works. 4th ed.Dutt, Clemens, trans. Smith, Stewart, ed. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ze‐dong, Mao (Tse‐tung, Mao). 1971. On contradiction. In Selected readings from the works of Mao Tse‐tung. Peking: Foreign Language Press.Google Scholar
Meeker, Joseph W. 1972. The comedy of survival: Studies in literary ecology. New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul, and Emerson, Caryl. 1989. Introduction: Rethinking Bakhtin. In Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and challenges, 160. Morson, and Emerson, , eds. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Patrick D. 1988a. Dialectics or dialogics: Method and message in the classroom. The GRIP report 8. Proceedings of the sixth annual meeting of the GRIP Project, May 20‐‐22, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Murphy, Patrick D. 1988b. Sex‐typing the planet. Environmental Ethics 10: 155–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Patrick D. 1989b. The high and low fantasies of feminist (re)mythopoeia. Mythlore 60(Winter): 16.Google Scholar
Murphy, Patrick D. 1991. Prolegomenon for an ecofeminist dialogics. In Feminism, Bakhtin, and the dialogic voice. Bauer, Dale M. and McKinstry, Susan Jaret, eds. Albany: State University of New York Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Oliver, Mary. 1979. Twelve moons. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Oliver, Mary. 1983. American primitive. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Oliver, Mary. 1986. Dream work. New York: Atlantic Monthly.Google Scholar
Piercy, Marge. 1976. Woman on the edge of time. New York: Fawcett Crest, 1977.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1985. Notes toward a politics of location. In Women, feminist identity and society in the 1980s: Selected papers. Díaz‐Diocaretz, Myriam and Zavala, Iris M. eds. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rooney, Ellen. 1989. Seductive reasoning: Pluralism as the problematic of contemporary literary theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sagan, Dorion. 1990. Biospheres: Reproducing planet earth. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Salleh, Ariel Kay. 1984. Deeper than deep ecology: The eco‐feminist connection. Environmental Ethics 6: 339–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Paul. 1988. Discerning the subject. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Gary. 1974. Turtle island. New York: New Directions.Google Scholar
Snyder, Gary. 1977. The old ways. San Francisco: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1987. In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Tarantelli, Carole B. 1986. And the last walls dissolved: On imagining a story of the survival of difference. In Women in culture and politics: A century of change. Friedlander, Judithet al., eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Tepper, Sheri S. 1988. The Gate to Women's Country. New York: Bantam, 1989.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V.N. [Bakhtin, M.M.]. 1976. Freudianism: A Marxist critique. Titunik, I.R. trans.Titunik, I.R. and Bruss, Neal H., eds. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V.N. [Bakhtin, M.M.]. 1986. Marxism and the philosophy of language. Matejka, Ladislav and Titunik, I.R. trans. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Waage, Frederick O., ed. 1985. Teaching environmental literature: Materials, methods, resources. New York: MLA.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen J. 1987. Feminism and ecology: Making connections. Environmental Ethics 9: 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, Kate. 1979. Juniper Time. New York: Pocket Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Yaeger, Patricia. 1988. Honey‐mad women: Emancipatory strategies in women's wirings. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavala, Iris M. 1989. Bakhtin and the third: Communication as response. Critical Studies 1(2): 4363.Google Scholar
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Ground, Pivot, Motion: Ecofeminist Theory, Dialogics, and Literary Practice
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Ground, Pivot, Motion: Ecofeminist Theory, Dialogics, and Literary Practice
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Ground, Pivot, Motion: Ecofeminist Theory, Dialogics, and Literary Practice
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *