Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T01:58:06.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Kathleen Martindale  and
Martha J. Saunders
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that Shogan's critique, as well as that of Fox, fails to engage with the central focus of our article, which was to characterize and evaluate different approaches to lesbian ethics and to propose an alternative to the more familiar approaches.

Information

Type
COMMENT/REPLY
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , Fall 1993 , pp. 136 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fuss, Diana. 1991. inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heyward, Carter. 1989. Touching our strength: The erotic as power and the love of God. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, N.Y.: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, Kathleen, and Saunders, Martha. 1992. “Realizing love and justice: Lesbian ethics in the upper and lower case.” Hypatia 7(4): 148–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shogan, Debra. 1993. In defense of a worldly separatism. Hypatia 8(4): 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar