Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wxk4p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T03:56:04.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shared Communities of Interest: Feminism and Pragmatism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Charlene Haddock Seigfried
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay introduces some of the many interests, methodologies, and goals that the philosophical tradition of classical American philosophy, usually referred to as pragmatism, shares with feminist theories. Because pragmatism developed along with the emergence of departments of philosophy in the United States, it also begins recovering the shared history of some of the first women to receive philosophy degrees. It claims that women in and out of the academy influenced pragmatism and shows how contemporary feminist philosophers continue to challenge and appropriate it.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Feminism and Pragmatism , Spring 1993 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Addams, Jane. 1902. Democracy and social ethics New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane. 1922. Peace and bread in time of war. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Davis, Helen Edna. 1929. Tolstoy and Nietzsche: A problem in biographical ethics. New York: New Republic.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo. 1986. The clinical sociology of Jessie Taft. Clinical Sociology Review 4: 30–45.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo. 1990. Jane Addams and the men of the Chicago school, 1892–1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1899] 1976. “Consciousness” and experience [Psychology and philosophic method]. The middle works, Vol. 1: 1899–1901. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1902] 1976. Memorandum to President Harper on coeducation. The middle works, Vol. 2: 1902–1903. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1911] 1978. Is co‐education injurious to girls?The middle works, Vol. 6: 1910–1911. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1925] 1981. The later works, Vol. I: 1925: Experience and nature. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1929–1930] 1984. The later works Vol. 5: 1929–1930. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1931–1932] 1985. The later works, Vol. 6: 1931–1932. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1938] 1986. The later works, Vol. 12: 1938: Logic, the theory of inquiry. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Lynn D. 1990. Gender and higher education in the Progressive era. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
James, William [1907] 1975. Pragmatism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William [1890] 1981. The principles of psychology 3 Vol. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lasch, Christopher, ed. 1965. The social thought of Jane Addams. Indianapolis: Bobbs‐Merrill.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Lucy Sprague. 1940. My country tis of thee: The use and abuse of natural resources. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Rosalind. 1982. Beyond separate spheres: Intellectual roots of modern feminism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1990. William James's radical reconstruction of philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1993. Classical American philosophy's invisible women. Canadian Review of American Studies. Forthcoming, Spring.Google Scholar
Taft, Jessie. 1915. The woman movement from the point of view of social consciousness. Menasha, WI: Collegiate Press, George Banta Publishing.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Robert B. 1991. John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Daniel J. 1990. Science, community, and the transformation of American philosophy, 1860–1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Young, Ella Flagg. 1906. Ethics in the school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar