Article contents
Constituting Politics: Power, Reciprocity, and Identity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2020
Abstract
This essay considers whether liberal political theory has tools with which to count gender, and so gender relations, as political. Can liberal political theory count sub-ordination among the harms of sex inequality that the state ought to correct? Watson defends a version of deliberative democracy—liberalism—as able to place issues of social inequality in the form of hierarchical social identities at the center of its normative commitments, and so at the center of securing justice.
- Type
- Revisioning Deliberation
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Aristotle, . 1987. Politics. In A new Aristotle reader, ed. Ackrill, J. L. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2000. Feminism, the family, and the politics of the closet. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coalition against Trafficking in Women. 2007. http://www.catwinternational.org (accessed May 26, 2007).Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1989. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In The good polity, ed. Hamlin, Alan and Petit, Philip. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
International Organization for Migration. 2007. http://www.iom.int/jahia/jsp/index.jsp (accessed May 26, 2007).Google Scholar
Laden, Anthony Simon. 2001. Reasonably radical: Deliberative liberalism and the politics of identity. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence v. Texas. 539 U.S. 558. 2003. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02‐102. ZD.html (accessed May 26, 2007).Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1689/1960. Two treatises of government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Carol E., Magraw, Daniel B., Spring, Margaret F., and Strong, S. I., eds. 1998. The international human rights of women: Instruments of change. Washington, D.C.: American Bar Association, Section of International Law and Practice.Google Scholar
Mayer, Ann Elizabeth. 1996. Reflections on the proposed United States reservations to CEDAW: Should the constitution be an obstacle to human rights? Hastings Law Quarterly 23: 727–823.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. Feminism unmodified. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 2006. Are women human? And other international dialogues. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1989. On liberty; With The subjection of women; and chapters on socialism, ed. Collini, Stefan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1995. Political liberalism, justice, and gender. Ethics 105(1): 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scutt, Jocelynne A. 1996. The personal is political. In Radically speaking: Feminism reclaimed, ed. Bell, Diane and Klein, Renate. North Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 2000. Gender inequality and theories of justice. In Women, culture, and development: A study of human capabilities, ed. Nussbaum, Martha C. and Glover, Jonathan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UN Secretary General. 2006. International Women's Day Message. March 8. http://www.un.org/events/women/iwd/2006/message.html (accessed April 2, 2006).Google Scholar
UN Statistics Division. 2000. The world's women 2000: Trends and statistics, http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/ww2000/index.htm (accessed April 2, 2006).Google Scholar
UCSC Rape Prevention Education. 2006. Rape Statistics. http://www2.ucsc.edu/rape‐prevention/statistics.html (accessed April 2, 2006).Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by