Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T05:57:35.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Transgender Studies and Feminism: Theory, Politics, and Gendered Realities
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/la frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. Michael. 2003. The man who would be queen: The science of gender‐bending and transsexualism. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1978. Gyn/Ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 1998. Female masculinity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, C. Jacob. 1998. Tracing a ghostly memory in my throat: Reflections on FTM feminist voice and agency. In Men doing feminism, ed. Digby, Tom. New York: Routledge, pp. 99129.Google Scholar
Hale, C. Jacob. 2008. Thinking trans studies separately from queer studies. Presentation at Los Angeles Queer Studies Conference, October 10.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. J. 1991. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist‐feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heyes, Cressida. 2000. Line drawings: Defining women through feminist practice. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, Cressida. 2003. Feminist solidarity after queer theory: The case of transgender. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (4): 1093–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, Sheila. 2003. Unpacking queer politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Koyama, Emi. 2003. The transfeminist manifesto. In Catching a wave: Reclaiming feminism for the 21st century, ed. Dicker, Rory and Piepmeier, Alison. Boston: Northeastern University Press, pp. 244259.Google Scholar
Koyama, Emi. 2006. Whose feminism is it anyway? The unspoken racism of the trans inclusion debate. In The transgender studies reader, ed. Stryker, Susan and Whittle, Stephen. New York: Routledge, pp. 698705.Google Scholar
Meyerowitz, Joanne. 2002. How sex changed: A history of transsexuality in the United States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lynn M., and Towle, Evan B. 2002. Romancing the transgender native: Rethinking the use of the “third gender” concept. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 8 (4): 469–97.Google Scholar
Morgan, Robin. 1977. Going too far: The personal chronicle of a feminist. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Namaste, , Viviane, K. 2000. “Tragic misreadings”: Queer theory's erasure of transgender subjectivity. In Invisible lives: The erasures of transsexual and transgendered people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 923.Google Scholar
>Namaste, , Viviane, K. 2005. Against transgender rights. In Sex change, social change: Reflections on identity, institutions, and imperialism. Toronto: Women's Press, pp. 103126.Google Scholar
Prosser, Jay. 1997. Transgender. In Lesbian and gay studies: A critical introduction, ed. Medhurst, Andy and Munt, Sally R.London: Cassell, pp. 309326.Google Scholar
Prosser, Jay. 1998. Second skins: The body narratives of transsexuality. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Janice. 1979. The transsexual empire: The making of the she‐male. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Riddell, Carol. 2006. Divided sisterhood: A critical review of Janice Raymond's The transsexual empire. In The transgender studies reader, ed. Stryker, Susan and Whittle, Stephen. New York: Routledge, pp. 144158.Google Scholar
Roen, Katrina. 2001. Transgender theory and embodiment: The risk of racial marginalization. Journal of Gender Studies 10 (3): 253–63. Reprinted in The transgender studies reader.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Henry. 2003. Self‐made men: Identity and embodiment among transsexual men. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1996. Queering the center by centering the queer: Reflections on transsexuals and secular Jews. In Feminists rethink the self, ed. Meyers, Diana Tietjens. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, pp. 124162.Google Scholar
Scott‐Dixon, Krista. 2006. Trans/forming feminisms: Trans/feminist voices speak out. Toronto: Sumach Press.Google Scholar
Shrage, Laurie. 2009. You've changed: Sex‐reassignment and personal identity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Sandy. 1991. The Empire strikes back: A posttransexual manifesto. In Body guards: The cultural politics of gender ambiguity, ed. Epstein, Julia and Straub, Kristina. New York: Routledge, pp. 280304.Google Scholar
Stryker, Susan. 2004. Transgender studies: Queer theory's evil twin. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 10 (2): 212–5.10.1215/10642684-10-2-212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Susan. 2008. Transgender history. Berkeley: Seal Press.Google Scholar
Stryker, Susan, and Whittle, Stephen, eds. 2006. The transgender studies reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Women of Olivia Records. 1977. Olivia replies. Sister: A west coast feminist newspaper. June/July.Google Scholar
Women's Studies Quarterly. 2008. Trans‐ special issue, ed. Susan Stryker, Paisley Currah, and Lisa Jean Moore. 36 (3 and 4).Google Scholar