Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:17:49.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Being Ugly in Public: The Politics of the Grotesque in Naked Protests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2020

Alexandra Fanghanel*
Affiliation:
Criminology, University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, LondonSE10 9LS, United Kingdom
*
Corresponding author. Email: a.n.d.fanghanel@greenwich.ac.uk

Abstract

Sexualized naked protest using young and attractive women's bodies have long featured in the repertoire of protest tools for interventions in public space. Antirape feminist groups and nonhuman-animal rights activist groups, in particular, have mobilized these bodies to attract attention to their causes. Contemporary debates have suggested that these sorts of protest are objectionable, and that they are entwined with contemporary rape culture. This article complicates these accounts by considering what happens when the naked body is presented as a grotesquery in the service of these apparently emancipatory politics.

Analyzing two instances of naked protest as case studies, this article examines what happens to naked protest when the bodies protesting are “ugly” or are rendered so. The analysis suggests that naked protest featuring bodies that are “ugly” harbors the possibility of mobilizing a transgressive politics beyond contemporary rape culture. This article has implications for better understanding how to mobilize protest in a way that is transgressive and bold without further enshrining rape culture as the normative background against which it takes place.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C. J. 1990/2016. The sexual politics of meat. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Redwood City, California Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronczyk, M. 2013. Market(ing) activism: Lush cosmetics, ethical oil, and the self-mediation of protest. JOMEC Journal 4: 120.Google Scholar
The Atlantic 2018. February 14. Femen: Beauty is our weapon (Part I) [video file] https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=SIS5poAGdoQGoogle Scholar
The Atlantic 2018. February 15. Femen: Beauty is our weapon (Part II) [video file] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpdC8o2fY6YGoogle Scholar
Baker, N. 2010. Plain ugly: The unattractive body in early modern culture. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1984. Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bongiorno, R., Bain, P., and Hasalm, N. 2013. When sex doesn't sell: Using sexualized images of women reduces support for ethical campaigns. PLoS ONE 8 (12): e83311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, M. L. 2005. Carnivalesque protest and the humorless state. Text and Performance Quarterly 25 (2): 136–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. 2011. Bodies in alliance and the politics of the street. Lecture given in Venice, September 7, as part of the series The State of Things, organized by the Office for Contemporary Art Norway (OCA).Google Scholar
Carmichael, P. A. 1972. The sense of ugliness. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 30 (4): 495–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr-Gomm, P. 2010. A brief history of nakedness. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Chávez, K. R. 2012. ACT UP, Haitian migrants, and alternative memories of HIV/AIDs. Quarterly Journal of Speech 98 (1): 6368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debord, G. 1967/1994. The society of the spectacle. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Deckha, M. 2008. Disturbing images: PETA and the feminist ethics of animal advocacy. Ethics and the Environment 13 (2): 3567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLuca, K. M. 1999. Unruly arguments: The body rhetoric of Earth First!, ACT UP, and Queer Nation. Argumentation and Advocacy 36 (1): 921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and danger. Abindgon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Douglas, M.. 1992. Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eileraas. 2014. Sex(t)ing revolution, femen-izing the public square: Aliaa Magda Elmahdy, nude protest, and transnational body politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 40 (1): 4052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanghanel, A. 2019. Disrupting rape culture. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
Femen, n.d. About Us. Femen Official Blog https://femen.org/about-us/Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1970/1994. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1920/2003. Beyond the pleasure principle, and other writings. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Glasser, C. L. 2011. Tied oppressions: An analysis of how sexist imagery reinforces speciesist sentiment. The Brock Review 12 (1): 5168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, K. 2016. Dir. Ukraine is not a brothel [film]. New York: Magnolia Pictures.Google Scholar
Halprin, S. 1996. Look at my ugly face: Myths and musings on beauty and other perilous obsessions with women's appearance. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. 1977. Hérétique de l'amour. Tel Quel 74 (Winter): 3049.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. 1980/1982. Powers of horror: An assay on abjection. Trans. Roudiez, L.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, A. 1985. Poetry is not a luxury. In Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Berkeley: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Lunceford, B. L. 2012. Naked politics: Nudity, political action, and the rhetoric of the body. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lush. 2012. Lush fighting animal testing: Live demonstration at Regents Street. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4K9iSyj_lk.Google Scholar
Mika, M. 2006. Framing the issue: Religion, secular ethics and the case of animal rights mobilization. Social Forces 85 (2): 915–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, K. P. 1991. Women and the knife: Cosmetic surgery and the colonization of women's bodies. Hypatia 6 (3): 2553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulvey, L. 1989. Visual and other pleasures. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Keefe, T. 2011. Flaunting our way to freedom? SlutWalks, gendered protests and feminist futures. In New Agendas in Social Movement Studies, November 2011, National University of Ireland Maynooth.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, T. 2014. My Body is my Manifesto! SlutWalk, FEMEN and femmenist protest. Feminist Review 107 (1): 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omond, T. 2012. Lush's human performance art was about animal cruelty not titillation. The Guardian Newspaper, April 27. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/apr/27/lush-animal-cruelty-performance-art.Google Scholar
Oriola, T. 2012. The Delta creeks, women's engagement and Nigeria's oil insurgency. British Journal of Criminology 52 (3): 534–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pace, L. 2005. Image events and PETA's anti fur campaign. Women and Language 28 (2): 3341.Google Scholar
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. n.d. Why does PETA sometimes use nudity in its campaigns? https://www.peta.org/about-peta/faq/why-does-peta-sometimes-use-nudity-in-its-campaigns/Google Scholar
Phelan, P., and Lane, J., eds. 1998. The ends of performance. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pipkin, A. C. 2013. Rape in the republic 1609–1725: Formulating Dutch identity. Leiden: Brill NV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puwar, N. 2004. Space invaders: Race, gender and bodies out of place. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Reed, T. V. 2005. The art of protest: Culture and activism from the civil rights movement to the streets of Seattle. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Reestorff, C.M. 2014. Mediated affectivtive factiv8ism: The activist imaginary and the topless body on the Femen movement. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into new Media technologies 20 4: 478–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, A. 1984/2003. Notes toward a politics of location. In Feminist postcolonial theory: A reader, ed. Lewis, Raina and Mills, Sara. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosario, C. 2015. Animals and angels. Performance Research 20 (2): 96101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, M. 1994. The female grotesque: Risk, excess and modernity. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Semigina, T. 2015. HIV-activism in a post-socialist state: The case of Ukraine. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal 1: 113–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, P. Jr. 2006. Women's aggressive use of genital power in Africa. Transcultural Psychiatry 43 (4): 592–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tayler, J. 2013. The woman behind Femen's topless protest movement. The Atlantic, March 13. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/03/the-woman-behind-femens-topless-protest-movement/273970/Google Scholar
Turner, V.W. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Ussher, J. M. 2006. Managing the monstrous feminine: Regulating the reproductive body. Hove, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veneracion-Rallonza, M. L. 2014. Women's naked body protests and the performance of resistance: Femen and Meira Paibi protests against rape. Philippine Political Science Journal 35 (2): 251–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegenstein, B. 2018. Agatha's breasts on a plate: “Ugliness” as resistance and queerness. In On the Politics of Ugliness, ed. Rodrigues, Sara and Przybylo, Ela. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wrenn, C. L. 2015. The role of professionalization regarding female exploitation in the nonhuman-animal rights movement. Journal of Gender Studies 24 (2): 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zychowicz, J. 2011. Two bad words: Femen and feminism in independent Ukraine. Anthropology of East Europe Review 29 (2): 215–27.Google Scholar
Zychowicz, J.. 2015. Performing protest: Femen, nation and the marketing of resistance. Journal of Ukrainian Politics and Society 1 (1): 74104.Google Scholar