Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:37:18.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Skepticism and the Lure of Ambiguity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Lorraine Code
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Musings
Information
Hypatia , Volume 21 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Feminist Epistemologies of Ignorance , Summer 2006 , pp. 222 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

De Beauvoir, Simone. 1948/1976. The ethics of ambiguity. Trans. Frechtman, Bernard. New York: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1987. Epistemic responsibility. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1995. Taking subjectivity into account. In Rhetorical spaces: Essays on (gendered) locations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 2003. Introduction: Why feminists do not read Gadamer. In Feminist interpretations of Hans‐Georg Gadamer, ed. Code, Lorraine. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. 1994. What is philosophy? Trans. Burchell, Graham and Tomlinson, Hugh. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Ed. Gordon, Colin. Trans. Gordon, Colin, Marshall, Leo, Mepham, John, and Soper, Kate. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The question concerning technology and other essays. Trans. Lovitt, William. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Le Dœuff, Michèle. 1995. Simone de Beauvoir: Falling into (ambiguous) line. Trans. Simons, Margaret A. In Feminist interpretations of Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Simons, Margaret A.University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Gail. 1995. Ambiguity, absurdity, and reversibility: Responses to indeterminacy. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 26 (1): 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar