Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-07T22:18:00.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Global Growth of Criminology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Extract

When the planning committee of the 12th International Congress on Criminology assigned me the task to take the floor at the final plenary session and to speak to the audience about the global growth of criminology the members surely had in mind that I should or would concentrate on the possible ways of development of criminological theory, research, policy, and practice in the immediate future. I actually thought myself that this may be the most appropriate way to deal with the matter. Some further reflections, however, and some additional experiences I gained through the manyfold personal contacts during this Congress in Seoul, led me to another solution. I thought I should rather take the opportunity of having before me participants from so many different mental traditions and so diverse scholarly backgrounds to address a couple of historically oriented and structurally shaped remarks. These remarks aim at providing us with some understanding in what way criminological knowledge emerged out of the process of modernization in the 18th and 19th centuries, how it was and to a certain extent still is embedded in the notion of scientific progress and the hope of eventual lasting improvement of the « conditio humana », and why in the late 20st century those expectations tend to fade away.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 International Society for Criminology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

(1)

Institute of Criminology, University of Tübingen, Germany.

(2)

This article is a slightly modified version of a speech originally presented at the closing session of the 12th International Congress on Criminology, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2429 August 1998. I was acting there in my capacity as President of the International Society for Criminology. The oral form is mostly retained. References to the works I was referring to are added here for the sake of convenience.

References

Adler, F., Mueller, G.O.W., Laufer, W.S.: Criminology. Third Edition, Boston et al. 1998 (Chapter 3: Schools of Thought Throughout History, pp. 4665.Google Scholar
Beccaria, C., Dei Delitti e delle Pene, Livorno, 1764.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., De la Division du Travail Social, Paris, 1893.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., Les Règles de la Méthode Sociologique, Paris, 1895.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., Le Suicide. Elude de Sociologie, Paris, 1897.Google Scholar
Eikelpasch, R., Rademacher, C., «Postindustrielle Gesellschaft», Soziologische Gesellschaftsbegriffe, Hrsg, von Kneer/Nassehi/Schroer, München, 1997, pp. 205227.Google Scholar
Eriksson, T., The Reformers: An Historical of Pioneer Experiments in the Treatment of Criminals, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Guerry, A.M., Essay sur la Statistique Morale de la France, Paris, 1833.Google Scholar
Henderson, C.R., «Penology in the United States. Outline of a Progressive Programme», Mitteilungen der Internationalen Kriminalistischen Vereinigung, Band 21, Heft 1, Berlin, 1914, pp. 117 ff.Google Scholar
Kaiser, G., «Stand und Perspektiven gegenwärtiger Kriminologie in den Vereinigten Staaten und in Großbritannien», Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, Band 110, Heft 3, 1998, pp. 674 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liszt, F. von, «Der Zweckgedanke im Strafrecht [Marburg 1882]», Ders. Strafrechtliche Aufsätze und Vorträge, Band 1, Berlin, 1905, pp. 126179.Google Scholar
Liszt, F. von, «Die Entstehung der Internationalen Kriminalistischen Vereinigung», Mitteilungen der Internationalen Kriminalistischen Vereinigung, Band 21, Heft 1, Berlin, 1914, pp. 1 ff.Google Scholar
Lombroso, C., «L’Uomo Delinquente», Rapporto all’Anthropologia, alla giurisprudenza e dalle discicpline carcerarie, Torino, 1876.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Η. (Ed.), Pioneers in Criminology, London 1960 (Re-Ed. Montclair, New Jersey, 1972).Google Scholar
Nassehi, A., «Risikogesellschaft», Soziologische Gesellschaftsbegriffe, Hrsg, von Kneer/Nassehi/Schroer, München, 1997, pp. 252279.Google Scholar
Oettingen, A. von, Die Moralstatistik in ihrer Bedeutung für eine christliche Socialethik, 2. Auflage, Erlangen, 1874.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A., Sur l’Homme et le Développement de ses Facultés ou Essai de Physique Sociale, Bruxelles, 2 Vol., 1836.Google Scholar
Schneider, H.J., Kriminologie, Berlin, New York, 1987 (pp. 920 ff.: Pioniere der Kriminologie).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L.W., Gottfredson, D.C., Mackenzie, D.L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., Bushway, S.D., Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising, Washington, NIJ, 1997. The main issues and findings are summarized (same authors and same title) in the following 20 pages brochure: National Institute of Justice, Research in Brief July 1998 (NCJ 1716676). Updated information can be found on the following Web site: http://www.preventingcrime.org.CrossRefGoogle Scholar