Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:12:29.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fission and the Origin of Binary Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Jeremiah P. Ostriker*
Affiliation:
Princeton University Observatory, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Brief reviews of the classical ‘angular momentum problem’ and the statistics of upper-main-sequence binaries are presented as background for the suggestion that the close, early-type, binaries are produced by fission of rapidly rotating protostars.

Next, theoretical sequences of contracting, rotating stars are described. Recent work demonstrates that the zero-viscosity, polytropic sequences, have essentially the same properties as the McLaurin sequence. Thus, fission is possible for centrally condensed stars. Observations of close early-type binaries are compared with theoretical predictions for the minimum angular momentum in binary systems of given total mass; the agreement is excellent.

Finally, the existing theoretical objections to the fission hypothesis for the origin of binary stars are reviewed, and it is concluded that, although fission remains unproven, there are now no strong theoretical arguments against the process, and there is considerable observational support for its existence.

Type
Part III / Stellar Rotation in Binaries, Clusters, and Special Objects. Statistics of Stellar Rotation
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1970

References

Blaauw, A.: 1961, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 15, 265.Google Scholar
Blaauw, A. and Van Albada, T. S.: 1969, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. (in press).Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, P.: 1969, paper presented at the 16th Liege Symposium.Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, P. and Ostriker, J. P.: 1970, Astrophys. J. (in press).Google Scholar
Cartán, E.: 1922, Bull. Sci. Math. 2e Ser. 46, 316, 356.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S.: 1967, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 20, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, G. H.: 1916, Collected Works, Vol. III.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, M.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 152, 523.Google Scholar
Hardorp, J. and Strittmatter, P. A.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 153, 465.Google Scholar
James, R. A.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 552.Google Scholar
Jeans, J. H.: 1919, Problems of Cosmogony and Stellar Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jeans, J. H.: 1929, Astronomy and Cosmology (reprinted by Dover Publications: New York, 1961), Chap. X.Google Scholar
Kraft, R. P.: 1969, Otto Struve Memorial (ed. by Herbig, G.) (in press).Google Scholar
Kuiper, G. P.: 1935, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 47, 121.Google Scholar
Larson, R. B.: 1968, Thesis, Cal. Inst, of Technology.Google Scholar
Lebovitz, N. R.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 134, 500.Google Scholar
Lyttleton, R.: 1953, The Stability of Rotating Liquid Masses, Cambridge Univ. Press., Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCrea, W. H.: 1961, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A260, 152.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J. P. and Bodenheimer, P.: 1968, Astrophys. J., 151, 1089.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J. P. and Mark, J. W-K.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 151, 1075.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J. P. and Tassoul, J. L.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 155, 987.Google Scholar
Rossner, L. F.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 149, 145.Google Scholar
Roxburgh, I.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 143, 111.Google Scholar
Schatzman, E.: 1962, Ann. Astrophys. 25, 18.Google Scholar
Spitzer, L.: 1968, Stars and Stellar Systems, Vol. VII (ed. by Middlehurst, B. M. and Aller, L. H.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Chap. 1.Google Scholar
Tassoul, J. L. and Ostriker, J. P.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 154, 613.Google Scholar
Tassoul, J. L. and Ostriker, J. P.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. (in press).Google Scholar
Van Albada, T. S.: 1968a, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 20, 47.Google Scholar
Van Albada, T. S.: 1968b, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 20, 57.Google Scholar
Von Weizsäcker, C. F.: 1947, Z. Astrophys. 24, 181.Google Scholar