No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Astrophysical existential threats: a comparative analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 June 2022
Abstract
Using a simple, coarse-grained Poisson process model, we calculate – for seven types of astrophysical catastrophe – both their individual and combined threat to complex lifeforms (extraterrestrial intelligences (ETIs)) throughout the Milky Way Galaxy. In terms of cumulative effects, we calculate that ETIs are likely to be astrophysically driven extinct on timescales of roughly once every 100 million years. In terms of comparative effects, large bolide impactors represent the most significant type of astrophysical contribution to the galaxy-wide debilitation of hypothesized ETI civilizations. Nonetheless, we conclude that astrophysical existential threats – whether taken singly or in combination – are likely insufficient, alone, to explain the Fermi Paradox. Astrophysical catastrophes, while both deadly and ubiquitous, do not appear to be frequent enough to wipe out every species in the Galaxy before they can attain or utilize spacefaring status.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Annis, J (1999) An astrophysical explanation for the great silence. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 52, 19–22.Google Scholar
Arbab, B and Rahva, S (2021) Close steller encounters kicking planets out of habitable zone in various stellar environments. International Journal of Modern Physics D 30, 2150063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atri, D and Melott, A (2011) Biological implications of high-energy cosmic ray induced muon flux in the extragalactic shock model. Geophysical Research Letters 38, 19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049027 (Accessed 28 April 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailor-Jones, C (2009) The evidence for and against astronomical impacts on climate change and mass extinctions: a review. International Journal of Astrobiology 8, 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostrom, N and Cirkovic, M (2008) Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, B and Ostlie, D (2007) An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics, 2nd Edn. San Francisco, CA: Pearson Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Chapman, C (2004) The hazard of near-earth asteroid impacts on earth. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 222, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopra, A and Lineweaver, C (2016) The case for a Gaian bottleneck: the biology of habitability. Astrobiology 16, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dar, A (2008) Influence of supernovae, gamma-ray bursts, solar flares, and cosmic rays on the terrestrial environment. In Bostrom, N and Cirkovic, M (eds), Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 238–262.Google Scholar
Drake, N (2014) How My Dad's Equation Sparked the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. Available at https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/140630-drake-equation-50-years-later-aliens-science (Accessed 28 April 2022).Google Scholar
Hart, M (1979) An explanation for the absence of extraterrestrials on earth. The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 16, 128–135.Google Scholar
Laskar, J (1994) Large scale chaos in the Solar System. Astronomy and Astrophysics 287, L9–L12.Google Scholar
Laskar, J (2013) Is the Solar System stable? Progress in Mathematical Physics 66, 239–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laskar, J and Gastineau, M (2008) Existence of collisional trajectories of Mercury, Mars and Venus with earth. Nature 459, 817–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melott, A and Thomas, B (2011) Astrophysical ionizing radiation and earth: a brief review and census of intermittent intense source. Astrobiology 11, 343–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, LS (2012) Conservation of Wildlife Populations: Demography, Genetics and Management, 2nd Edn. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Newman, M (1997) A model of mass extinction. Journal of Theoretical Biology 189, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, J (2016) Estimates for the number of visible galaxy-spanning civilizations and the cosmological expansion of life. International Journal of Astrobiology 16, 176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlov, A, Toon, O, Pavlov, A, Bally, J and Pollard, D (2005) Passing through a giant molecular cloud: ‘Snowball’ glaciations produced by interstellar dust. Geophysical Research Letters 32, L033705.1–LL03705.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohen, G, von Savigny, C, Sinnhuber, M, Llewellyn, E, Kaiser, J, Jackman, C, Kallenrode, M-B, Schroter, J, Eichmann, K-U, Bovensmann, H and Burrows J (2005) Ozone depletion during the solar proton events of October/November 2003 as seen by SCIAMACHY. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, A, Armstrong, S and Cirkovic, M (2017) That is not dead which can eternal lie: the aestivation hypothesis for resolving Fermi's paradox. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.03394 (Accessed 28 April 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P and Brownlee, D (2020) Rare Earth: Why Complex Life Is Uncommon in the Universe. New York, NY: Copernicus Books.Google Scholar
Webb, S (2015) If the Universe is Teeming with Aliens … Zhere Is Everybody?: Seventy-Five Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Williams, M (2020) Beyond ‘Fermi's Paradox’ ix: What is the brief window hypothesis?. Available at https://www.universetoday.com/147590/beyond-fermi-paradox-ix-what is the brief window hypothesis (Accessed 28 April 2022).Google Scholar
Wilman, R, Dayal, P and Ward, M (2018) Hazards and habitability: galactic perspectives. In Wilman, R and Newman, C (eds), Frontiers of Space Risk: Natural Cosmic Hazards & Societal Challenges. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar