Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:25:58.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formalizing the Fermi paradox and combining consistent explanatory hypotheses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2022

Alexandre Costa-Leite*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Brasília, Brasília-DF, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Alexandre Costa-Leite, E-mail: costaleite@unb.br

Abstract

A formalization of Fermi paradox inside the environment of classical propositional logic is proposed. The notion of Silentium Universi set is launched in order to establish that the Fermi paradox is truly paradoxical. Combining consistent explanatory hypotheses is taken into consideration and discussed inside this framework explaining what would count as a solution to the paradox. By the end, it is argued that Fermi paradox is an unsolvable problem in the domain of science.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, JA (1973) The Zoo hypothesis. Icarus 19, 347349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, JD (1998) Impossibility – The Limits of Science and the Science of Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brin, GD (1983) The ‘great silence’: the controversy concerning extraterrestrial intelligent life. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 24, 283309.Google Scholar
Ćirković, M (2016) Fermi's paradox is a daunting problem – under whatever label. Astrobiology 16, 737740.Google ScholarPubMed
Ćirković, M (2018) The Great Silence – The Science and Philosophy of Fermi's Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Döbler, N (2022) Where will they be: hidden implications of solutions to the Fermi paradox. International Journal of Astrobiology 21(4), 200204.Google Scholar
Freitas, RA (1985) There is no Fermi paradox. Icarus 62, 518520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, RH (2015) The Fermi paradox is neither Fermi's nor a paradox. Astrobiology 15, 195199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, MH (1975) An explanation for the absence of extraterrestrials on earth. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 16, 128135.Google Scholar
Kardashev, NS (1964) Transmission of information by extraterrestrial civilizations. Soviet Astronomy 8, 217221.Google Scholar
Kardashev, NS (1985) On the inevitability and the possible structures of supercivilizations. In MD Papagiannis (ed.), The Search for Extraterrestrial Life: Recent Developments, Boston: International Astronomical Union, pp. 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lem, S (1999) The new cosmogony. In A Perfect Vacuum, translated by Michael Kandel, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, pp. 197–231.Google Scholar
Salerno, J (ed.) (2009) New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklovskii, IS and Sagan, C (1966) Intelligent Life in the Universe. London: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Smart, JM (2012) The transcension hypothesis: sufficiently advanced civilizations invariably leave our universe, and implications for METI and SETI. Acta Astronautica 78, 5568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szocik, K and Abylkasymova, R (2022) If extraterrestrial intelligence exists, it is unable to recognize humans as intelligent beings. International Journal of Astrobiology 17. doi:10.1017/S1473550422000179Google Scholar
Tipler, F (1980) Extraterrestrial intelligent beings do not exist. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 21, 267281.Google Scholar
Webb, S (2015) If the Universe is Teeming with Aliens…Where is Everybody? Seventy-Five Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life. 2nd ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar